UK foreign minister Ian Pearson confirms WTC7 demolished

[TimmyG]

Ok.
So I've been in contact with my local mp over the last few months with regards to 9/11 and WTC7 specifically. I recently got this letter via my mp from Ian Pearson.



so building 7 was demolished then? hmmm. I think Larry Silverstein might have something to say about that.
Or maybe 'pulled down' means something else

as the 'minister responsible for our relations with the US' he seems a bit out of touch! the 2002 9/11 commision report appears to be the only one he's aware of!

[Andrew Johnson]

Timmy,

Good to have it on record then!

Nice they were able to wire the building for symmetric demolition in only oo err um 9 or 10 hours.

Probably not much point, but write back and ask him

1) Can he find the passages in the Commission Report which refer to WTC 7.
2) Which demolition company demolished WTC 7, and how was it they were able to complete such a complicated job (with fires burning in the building, of course) in, say, 10 hours?

3) If the building was indeed demolished, why have NIST still not published their final report for WTC 7. It must be an easy job as it would say: "Fire damage on Floors x,y, z. Building demolished by Company B. (headed, of course, by the Boogey Woogey Bugle Boy)" So why has this report gone out to tender?

So good to have these denials on record though!

Cheers Man,

Andrew

[insidejob]

This is good work. I'm not sure what the Minister is saying here. The letter does not state that WTC7 was pulled down but it does imply it. This needs clarification.

I think the letter should be sent to Alex Jones so as he can follow it up.

[TRUTH]

[TimmyG]

yeah. I'm going to reply and ask him if he can confirm it.

not going to send anything to alex jones or anyone like that just yet. Lets see how he responds to further questions.

[Pikey]

Nice one TG!

Yep I agree with you, send him the tough follow up Qs (AJ's are spot on IMHO!) and paste your letter on here then his response to it.

Peace & truth

[HERA]

" .. a number of ... other buildings ... were .. pulled down in the aftermath ... "

WTC7, only, as far as I know. !!??

[Andrew Johnson]

Hera,

I believe building 6 was demolished some WEEKS after 9/11 - that's what the letter my be trying to deflect attention on to and cloud the issue.

[TimmyG]

i heard 5 and 6 were demolished weeks after, yeah.

not sure exactly what went on with the demolition of the site. would be interesting to know the details. + it would be interesting to know if WTC7 had any unique structural designs compared to the other buildings which were closer to the twin towers but didn't collapse in less than freefall speed from fires started by falling debris.

I've written back asking him if he is saying that WTC7 was demolished, and which company did it and where the 2002 9/11 comission report mentions wtc7. just gotta wait now. Prob gonna be about a month. i'll let u all know what happens

[TimmyG]

well said!!

my thoughts exactly.

i'm just going to see how far i get until someone tells me to shut up and leave them alone, just to satisfy my own curiosty as much as anything.

I'd be suprised if I actually got anywhere with this.

[Annie]

[numeral]

[Graham]

isn't it frustrating MP's won't do things by email. Would only take days, instead of months.

[numeral]

[Graham]

...also.. that letters pretty much a standard reply from the Home Office. Got the same response from my MP Cheryl Gillan, who does not beleive "any" of the conspiracy "theories". (which ones )

This is despite asking two distinct questions, niether answered by that standard reply.

[TimmyG]

still waiting for a reply...

I strongly urge EVERYONE to write to their MP asking specific questions like this. Don't suggest you know what happened, just ask them what happened to WTC7 or maybe mention some other piece of hard evidence like the put options, prior knowledge, attas funding/Pakistani ISI connection.

Try and be as civil and democratic as possible. If they refuse to answer remind them of the freedom of information act.

It might not do any good but it's well worth the effort. There's a chance a few of our politicians might be capable of looking at things indepedently. Michael Meacher was.

[TimmyG]

after responding immediately (in april) to this letter from ian pearson, with a request for mr pearson to confirm that his letter is saying that wtc7 was demolished, i recieved no reply. that is until i recently wrote again with this:
(note i am writing to ian pearson via my local mp)

[Justin]

Hi TimmyG

b* any list they can put you on! If we are to win against the NWO/Illuminati/PTB we all have to be fearless of them - show any fear and they have won! They number in their thousands - we in the billions! The odds are with us!!!

Best wishes

Justin

PS By the way, good work on WTC7 and keep up the pressure - the perfect freefall into its own footprint is the key that you must concentrate on - it simply defies commonsense.

[TimmyG]

hey thanks for the kind words of encouragement justin

[Leiff]

The approach to take is the steel melts at around 2500 degrees and fuel burns at around 700 degrees hypothesis.

As for the list put me on too!