| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
humanoid
Minor Poster
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Posts: 48
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flamesong
Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news
|
 Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:07 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
It all goes so well. How often does anybody get that kind of opportunity to take the floor. David Shayler engaged the interviewer so much that Jonothan Margolis hardly got a look in. I doubt anybody could have done a better job of setting out the 9/11 Truth stall on a 'serious' (it was Sky!) news programme.
And then he blew all his credibility by suggesting (I'm guessing) that no planes hit the World Trade Center.
Jonothan Margolis had joked that David Shayler might be cointelpro earlier in the discussion. I'm sorry, David, but if you lay a credible foundation and then garnish it with low level scifi you can hardly be surprised at the flak you get. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
numeral
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| flamesong wrote: | It all goes so well. How often does anybody get that kind of opportunity to take the floor. David Shayler engaged the interviewer so much that Jonothan Margolis hardly got a look in. I doubt anybody could have done a better job of setting out the 9/11 Truth stall on a 'serious' (it was Sky!) news programme.
And then he blew all his credibility by suggesting (I'm guessing) that no planes hit the World Trade Center.
Jonothan Margolis had joked that David Shayler might be cointelpro earlier in the discussion. I'm sorry, David, but if you lay a credible foundation and then garnish it with low level scifi you can hardly be surprised at the flak you get. |
A. 19 suicide hijackers
B. remote piloting of big Boeings
C. no big Boeings
_________________
Follow the numbers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| numeral wrote: |
A. 19 suicide hijackers
B. remote piloting of big Boeings
C. no big Boeings |
I don't exactly know what the point of that is, perhaps you could explain? While you are at it i'd be interested to know why you aren't interested in any other options....
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
numeral
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 500
Location: South London
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fallious wrote: | | numeral wrote: |
A. 19 suicide hijackers
B. remote piloting of big Boeings
C. no big Boeings |
I don't exactly know what the point of that is, perhaps you could explain? While you are at it i'd be interested to know why you aren't interested in any other options.... |
There could be. Add them in.
_________________
Follow the numbers |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
