Guardian pulls 9/11 Comments

[ianrcrane]

Although comments are still being posted on the following link, in response to George Monbiot's article in Tuesday's edition of the Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2006831,00.html

... this article does not appear on the list of 'Most Active Posts' in spite of the fact that there have been well over 1000 comments. Although 655 is the official number of posts, the figure was achieved by Thursday evening! We know that some posts are not getting through but the majority of those that do actually reflect very well, the case for 9/11 Truth.

In addition, there is no mention of Monbiot's article on the following link, which is to all Guardian articles (and associated comments) published in the past week:

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/weekbyweek/2007/02/04-week/

When coupled with the fact that the Daily Mail is still only showing 16 comments (see link below) in response to Sue Reid's article in today's edition, most of which pledge their support for the OCT, are we to assume that the magnitude & content of 9/11 Truth response is causing the PTB some concern?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_ article_id=435265&in_page_id=1811&in_page_id=1811&expand=true#StartCom ments

The BBC 9/11 programme is due for broadcast shortly and with the William Rodriguez' tour going from strength to strength, we just gotta make sure that we keep the snowball rolling.

Ian R. Crane

[Pikey]

[Bongo]

[Andrew Johnson]

I found it interesting that the Mail article mentioned the many comments on the Guardian one. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is pretty unusual.

There is clearly some "management" going on here.