Why are Muslims (Islam) the patsies for 911?

[Pikey]

What is unique about the Muslim (Islam) religion?

I have discovered that usary (loaning of money) is not permitted. It is a culture that is based on you only have what can afford and as a result personal debt to the money men is not facilitated.

This religion is a huge threat to the New World Order.

[Bongo]

http://www.globalresearch.ca/images/middleastmap.jpg

[Thermate]

Its an interesting point and could be a factor I'm sure but so is the fact Muslims are sitting on the majority of the worlds oil and Muslims are the natural enemies and neighbours of Israel... Guess it ultimately depends who is behind 911 itself, many have taken advantage of the event but not all of those were responsible for it.

[Newspeak International]

[London Mick]

A century or so ago, usary was also a sin in the Christian church and so Jews were the only ones who were allowed to lend money mostly. Hence the Shylock of Shakespeare's time.

Fundamentalist Islam has nothing to offer but it is dragging muslims back to the dark ages. It is stopping them evolving spiritually and this is exactly what the elite want. Billions of people stuck in a primitive mind set unable to work things out for themselves and easily led by dictators who work for the NWO. That, I'm afraid is the state of much of the muslim world today.
Fundamentalist Christianity serves the NWO in a similar way. The rapture looneys support Israel and see the emergence of this illegal, rogue, thug state as a portend for the coming of the Apocalypse and then the return of Jesus. The Zionists naturally take advantage of these simpletons and encourage them.

Both of these great religions have a core of truth and that is mostly to be found in the mystical teachings of Sufism and the deeper, hidden teachings of Christianity which can be found if one is diligent enough. Of course seeking that particular truth is frowned upon by the controllers of both religions.
Muslims need to start working things out for themselves and break the chains that bind them. The herd mentality must be smashed. As long as they are enslaved by the Mullahs they will remain the slaves of the NWO.

Christianity in the west may appear to have broken down and few people in England, for example, attend church anymore but that does not mean that people have stopped seeking after the meaning of life, eh Brian?
Something more profound is emerging in the place of outmoded religion.
Science and spirituality are sharing ideas and from the natural destruction and decay will blossom a new enlightenment. Providing the Kissingers of this world are dealt with severely.

Islam needs to go through this same process of change which happens to everything on this planet. Decay, death and re-birth.

Now what the hell has that got to do with 9/11? Lots, actually.

[Dogsmilk]

There might possibly be some margin in the embedded fear of Islam from a few centuries ago; when Constantinople fell to Mehmet (sp?) II in 1453 snuffing out what remained of the Byzantines, there was a genuine fear of Muslim expansion further into Europe and I think there was a bit of the kind of hysterical fear of muslims that's not too unfamiliar now.. I think off the top of my head (it being too late to start checking facts), an incursion in Italy was only stymied by Mehmet popping his clogs. After that, as empires go, the Ottoman empire had a pretty good run.
Prior to that, and perhaps more telling, the instigation of the Crusades quite handily stopped Christian knights from killing each other and wreaking havoc in Europe and gave a handy enemy to unite everyone under a common banner. Apparently, few people really knew what Islam was or what it was about, but it appears they didn't much care.
So there's a bit of a tradition going on.
Regarding the detrimental effect of fundamentalist Islam, it is kind of ironic that the mainstay of Wahhabism, Saudia Arabia, is such a darling of the United States.

[PaulStott]

[Snowygrouch]

And I suppose you think thats becuase the US military industrial complex want to foster a cultural exachange based on mutual understanding and religious knowledge for the benefit of mankind and peace on earth

[PaulStott]

No - because it was a mutualy beneficial deal for both sides, regardless of anyone else's interest.

That's capitalism.

I'm against it. Are you?

[Snowygrouch]

I would say the deal is fairly one sided really. When the Carlyse group was muscling in most of the Saudi royal family were dead set against it.

I also very much doubt the average Saudi had much choice in the matter.

Of course the Saudis get "protection" in the form of being occupied and having US airfields built on their soil.

Am I against it?

Well in this case (as in most these days) its the new US form of "ultimate capitalism" as I like to call it, teamwork. Get the military, oil & gas and politics involved and its a killer combination...literally.

I wouldnt call it any sort of US/Saudi co-operation I`d call it the US occupation of Saudi Arabia.

So yes of course I`m against it.

[uselesseater]

I think the main reason is convenience and that the Arab world is the biggest power block who are not part of the 'Democratic' Central banking scam. Or in other words 'Rouge States'.

The clash of civilisations between the west and the arqb world has long been foretold by the likes of H G Wells and Albert Pike.

The Islamic Militant and particularly, suicide bomber is a dream enemy for the Elite as they are invisible, insane and unstoppable giving rise to endless war and loss of freedom.

'Arabs' have featured as the enemy of the west, taking over from the Soviets, in recent decades. This has been propogated through many films like Die Hard etc... Hence some westerners now have a subliminal distrust of Arab Muslims which they don't even know where it origionates from.

[Mark Gobell]

Just for information.

Many folk claim that the NWO phrase was born with GHWB on 11.9.1990

However, it's history is a lot longer than that, originating in 1915.

[Newspeak International]

A few passages from MG's excellent link:

(For those who still believe the NWO is of a benign nature)

[lupefiasco]