View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ignatz Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 918
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 5:43 pm Post subject: JREF reaction to tc / Prole (very stupid, it seems) |
|
|
This is funny but true :
"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid quote mining to support a "no planes" theory is. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. To take such a quote out of context, to try to support the idea that there were no planes that crashed in to the Twin Towers is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. The "no planes" theory emits more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. The "no planes" theory has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride these ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel." _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i take it this comes from somebody who believes there was'nt one thing strange about 9/11?
although i lack the ability to see a whole lot of evidence for NPT im not sure i can understand why people can not see theres something wrong with 9/11 so i would fit this person under the same catergory. as it is completely obvious to anyone presented with the facts that more investigastion IS needed into 9/11.
so to me not seeing that things dont add up in regards to 9/11 is equally stupid, something NPT'ers can see at least. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thermate Angel - now passed away
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marky 54 wrote: | i take it this comes from somebody who believes there wasn't one thing strange about 9/11? |
Stupid^n
That's Ignatz. _________________ Make love, not money. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006 Posts: 1628
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 11:36 am Post subject: Re: JREF reaction to tc / Prole (very stupid, it seems) |
|
|
Ignatz wrote: | This is funny but true :
"I cannot believe how incredibly stupid quote mining to support a "no planes" theory is. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. To take such a quote out of context, to try to support the idea that there were no planes that crashed in to the Twin Towers is trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. The "no planes" theory emits more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. The "no planes" theory has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I'm sorry. I can't go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don't have enough strength left to deride these ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel." |
This is fine as far as it goes, but I do feel that the author rather understates quite how stupid NPT really is. _________________ ".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|