FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Even More Judy Woods Lunacy and Deception Debunked!

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Stefan
Banned
Banned


Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219

PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:12 pm    Post subject: Even More Judy Woods Lunacy and Deception Debunked! Reply with quote

http://www.journalof911studies.org/letters/f/Glowing-Aluminum-Disinfor mation-by-brian-vasquez.pdf

Brian Vasquez outs more BS from Judy Woods- she has apparently written a "paper" attacking Steven Jones which claims aluminium does glow orange when melted, and used for her photographs two images of molten iron from the book "Iron Melting Cupola Furnaces for the Small Foundry" causing Jim Fetzer to ask her to remove the article and appologise to Jones.

She removed them, but reposted a new one days later with the SAME PICTURES in but changing the claim it was aluminum to:

"The two photographs below show glowing metal pouring from a furnace.
We cannot tell what kinds of metals these are without additional information. Steven Jones cannot either, despite his claim that aluminum is always silvery and does not glow (much)."

Fans of Jim Fetzer's special brand of insanity will be pleased to hear after his little attack of good sense, he reposted both papers on his new website...

The UglyUglyShill Gang will no doubt be back soon with more adventures in disinformation...

_________________


Peace and Truth
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
fixuplooksharp
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 216

PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

good. thank god she has proved to us that she is an idiot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now this is a controversy worth bumping. AJ, any interest in defending your associates here?
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
John White
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
"The two photographs below show glowing metal pouring from a furnace.
We cannot tell what kinds of metals these are without additional information


Even if true (and I dont accept the statement), that's information she had and was withholding from the reader deliberately becuase the pictures came from a book about Iron smelting....

I'm sure there are gentile ways of describing this behaviour in the scholarly community, but I'm a straightforward fella, and round here we call it "lying through her teeth"

_________________
Free your Self and Free the World
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well the Beam Weapon is balls, as we all know, but I'm also beginning to doubt Jones theory. I think Jones comes across as credible because he genuinely believes what he's saying unlike Wood's.

As I've said a couple of times recently pure aluminum appears silvery gray in daylight but the alloy of the airframe was not pure aluminum. The appearance of molten alloys due to elevated temperatures seconds before collapse does sound possible. I'll have to reread Jones paper and research the appearance of molten alloys. One thing that is telling is a picture of solidified, once molten, metal in Jones paper (Q 'n' A). The solidified metal looks slightly silvery i.e. An alloy perhaps?


_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE<
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
IronSnot
Relentless Limpet Shill
Relentless Limpet Shill


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 595
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tend to the view that the towers had to come down to hide evidence (and maybe they were rigged when being built) but I always found a comment attributed to Al Queda by the American Govt quite interesting.

That was something to the effect that Bin Laden never expected the buildings to collapse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505

PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another piece of psyop nonsense fed to a general public similarly surprised that the towers should have fallen in order to strengthen their belief that bin Laden was behind 9/11. Rolling Eyes It enhances the plausibility of his responsibility, you see. Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group