| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
CB_Brooklyn
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 168
Location: NYC
|
 Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:11 pm Post subject: The TV Newscasters were Reading from Scripts on 9/11 |
 |
|
These two videos prove the TV newscasters were reading from scripts on 9/11:
VIDEO ONE
VIDEO TWO
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 1201
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
..
_________________
We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flamesong
Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Heads up for CB_Brooklyn...
Drum roll...*
Newscasters or 'news readers' read from scripts every fücking day. They don't write the news. Ever heard of autocue?
It kinda comes with the job title.
Know what I mean?
I don't need to watch (yet another) one of your stupid youtube clips.
Clear off!
*Apologies to Bill Hicks RIP |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels
Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 932
Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So was I reading from the terrorist script when I formed the opinion that it was terrorism after seeing the footage on 9/11?
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fish5133
Site Admin
Joined: 13 Sep 2006
Posts: 2568
Location: One breath from Glory
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:16 am Post subject: Re: The TV Newscasters were Reading from Scripts on 9/11 |
|
|
| Can you explain in words what it is your trying to show by these videos? I think I must be missing something. (a screw or two maybe) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| the octapus video again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice.
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
THETRUTHWILLSETU3
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 1009
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice. |
I'm sure CB will answer you in due course Telly
The reason that "The Media" will do everything in their power to discredit no planes is because the no planes con trick could not have taken place without them. If it is exposed then they are guilty as hell.
How do they control their "battle hardened professional newscasters"
Firstly they would carefully select who works for them in the first place.
They would know what their fears are, virtually everybody fears for their life, some would fear being exposed as homosexuals, others as paedophiles, others would fear for their job or threats made against their family.
The most important control on that day would be of the eye witness journalists and those at the scene after the event who interviewed the public.
The remaining studio based newcasters would only see what appeared on their monitors the same as you and I, and they would in some cases (as in the case of Dan Rather and controlled demolitions) report what they see.
Others would have a brief to steer away from these areas.
Everybody in public life has a file on them.
Remember the leadership battle for the Liberal Democrats when Charles Kennedy stepped down because of a drink problem?
Do you think it was just a coincidence that one of the contenders was exposed in The News of The World as having sex with a rent boy and another contender (when it looked like he would win) was exposed as a closet homosexual?
The same sort of things go on in the military, I'm sure you have seen the Kay Griggs interviews but if not they are posted below
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-341031042963487862 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice. |
I'm sure CB will answer you in due course Telly
The reason that "The Media" will do everything in their power to discredit no planes is because the no planes con trick could not have taken place without them. If it is exposed then they are guilty as hell.
How do they control their "battle hardened professional newscasters"
Firstly they would carefully select who works for them in the first place.
They would know what their fears are, virtually everybody fears for their life, some would fear being exposed as homosexuals, others as paedophiles, others would fear for their job or threats made against their family.
The most important control on that day would be of the eye witness journalists and those at the scene after the event who interviewed the public.
The remaining studio based newcasters would only see what appeared on their monitors the same as you and I, and they would in some cases (as in the case of Dan Rather and controlled demolitions) report what they see.
Others would have a brief to steer away from these areas.
Everybody in public life has a file on them.
Remember the leadership battle for the Liberal Democrats when Charles Kennedy stepped down because of a drink problem?
Do you think it was just a coincidence that one of the contenders was exposed in The News of The World as having sex with a rent boy and another contender (when it looked like he would win) was exposed as a closet homosexual?
The same sort of things go on in the military, I'm sure you have seen the Kay Griggs interviews but if not they are posted below
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-341031042963487862 |
and if the media are not hiding anything how would they beable to prove it in your mind?
or is it just a case of they did it and if they dont admit it they are covering up?
NO PLANES THE CONSPIRACY THEORY TO DESTROY THE TRUE CONSPIRACY BEING EXPOSED! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CB_Brooklyn
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 168
Location: NYC
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice. |
I honestly didn't know the newscasters were in on it, not until I saw this video. Although I knew for a while that the media broadcast fake planes, never in a million years did I think anyone in the media knew about it (except for the very higher ups), until I saw this video.
I can't really answer your question. But I think the wordings of FOX5 and WB11 are too similar to be pure coincidence.
btw, what "administration" are you talking about? Certainly not Bush's. They had, imo, absolutely nothing to do with the actual attacks. Impeaching Bush will do absolutely nothing. The secret government (aka Illuminati, aka global elite) must be exposed and removed from power.
I posted the video links in another forum. See the comment someone made:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=14969#14969 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| CB_Brooklyn wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice. |
I honestly didn't know the newscasters were in on it, not until I saw this video. Although I knew for a while that the media broadcast fake planes, never in a million years did I think anyone in the media knew about it (except for the very higher ups), until I saw this video.
I can't really answer your question. But I think the wordings of FOX5 and WB11 are too similar to be pure coincidence.
btw, what "administration" are you talking about? Certainly not Bush's. They had, imo, absolutely nothing to do with the actual attacks. Impeaching Bush will do absolutely nothing. The secret government (aka Illuminati, aka global elite) must be exposed and removed from power.
I posted the video links in another forum. See the comment someone made:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=14969#14969 |
What a steaming pile of turd. Anyone can go back and read CB_Brooklyns posting from the start. See how "undecided" CB has been throughout its career on this forum.
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CB_Brooklyn
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 168
Location: NYC
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fallious wrote: | | CB_Brooklyn wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice. |
I honestly didn't know the newscasters were in on it, not until I saw this video. Although I knew for a while that the media broadcast fake planes, never in a million years did I think anyone in the media knew about it (except for the very higher ups), until I saw this video.
I can't really answer your question. But I think the wordings of FOX5 and WB11 are too similar to be pure coincidence.
btw, what "administration" are you talking about? Certainly not Bush's. They had, imo, absolutely nothing to do with the actual attacks. Impeaching Bush will do absolutely nothing. The secret government (aka Illuminati, aka global elite) must be exposed and removed from power.
I posted the video links in another forum. See the comment someone made:
http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=14969#14969 |
What a steaming pile of turd. Anyone can go back and read CB_Brooklyns posting from the start. See how "undecided" CB has been throughout its career on this forum. |
You'd better be careful with that disinfo of yours |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
No... My post prompted people to look at your posting history. Other than that, there was no information. So I assume you are refering to your own posting history as disinfo.
Thanks for clearing that up.
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CB_Brooklyn
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 168
Location: NYC
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Fallious wrote: | No... My post prompted people to look at your posting history. Other than that, there was no information. So I assume you are refering to your own posting history as disinfo.
Thanks for clearing that up. |
you've outed yourself as a disinfo agent. Or perhaps you're just not man enough to admit the truth about TV-Fakery and must therefore act like a child. Wah Wah Wah. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CB_Brooklyn wrote: | | Fallious wrote: | No... My post prompted people to look at your posting history. Other than that, there was no information. So I assume you are refering to your own posting history as disinfo.
Thanks for clearing that up. |
you've outed yourself as a disinfo agent. Or perhaps you're just not man enough to admit the truth about TV-Fakery and must therefore act like a child. Wah Wah Wah. |
People equally accuse you of being the same for pushing the no-plane/TVfakery theory that few in the 9/11 truth movement believe. So I guess the kettle is calling the pot black. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
StopThe9/11CoverUp
Minor Poster
Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Posts: 74
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:53 am Post subject: u can see something heading towards the tower. |
|
|
Just thought id say that if you look closely at the first news clip from the camera you can see some sort of streak heading towards the tower. very vague but visible enough to see it, once you see it, rewind and see if you see it again. Its a bit of a b* to suss exactly where to look but once you do u see it every time.
Just as newsreader says "when you get up to this high level" just after camera zooms in. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
david carmichael
Moderate Poster
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | CB
Can you explain how battle hardened professional newscasters could be roped in to participating in the hoax? This would obviously include many other people in the studio/s on the day, cameramen, technicians, show producers etc.
The problem I have, is that not everyone will have a family or fear for their lives, in other words, you only want a couple who are not easily frightened into participating and the game is up.
Do you honestly believe that the adminstration would allow the entire operation to hinge on such an uncertain and uncontrollable aspect given what was at stake?
Explain how you see this working in practice. |
Well... the "hundreds of people would have had to have been in on it" motif is annihilated, in toto ,by the evidence of the murder of 34 US Sailors abaord the USS Liberty....
..in other words, that type of argument means NOTHING since the same thing was said about the USS Liberty and we now know that indeed was a "false flag" op.
I don't however know if these videos prove anything... nothing is "proof positive" as is claimed on the videos.
9/11 indeed was an inside job...but these TWO videos add nothing to the evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
