Re. 'the BBC would have filtered out this anomoly' Wasn't there a Beeb web page kicking around (only rectified last summer) that rewrote history claiming WTC7 "burned to the ground"?
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 36 Location: scotland/holland
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject:
has anyone else managed to post a link to this on any bbc message boards??? _________________ One day it's going to dawn on the human race that war is as barbaric a means of resolving conflict as cannibalism is as a means of coping with diet deficiencies.
im sorry to be a party pooper but what are we relying on for the time of broadcast? if i reposted this clip on youtube and claimed it was broadcast at 16:25 on 9/11 would anyone know any differant? or just believe me?
i see no clock that usually is inserted on bbc new 24 which they would of switched to for full coverage on the day.
was bbc news 24 around then? im not sure but my point is what are we relying on for broadcast time?
im sorry to be a party pooper but what are we relying on for the time of broadcast? if i reposted this clip on youtube and claimed it was broadcast at 16:25 on 9/11 would anyone know any differant? or just believe me?
i see no clock that usually is inserted on bbc new 24 which they would of switched to for full coverage on the day.
was bbc news 24 around then? im not sure but my point is what are we relying on for broadcast time?
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 36 Location: scotland/holland
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:01 pm Post subject:
someone said on the same subject on a different heading that at one point the newsreader says "it is now 8 hours since the attacks"
doesnt put a definate time on it, but its a start
I have posted it on the "have your say" bbc news bit with a link and a general question about it, but it gets taken off, saying due to volume of emails etc
perhaps someone else can try?
at least to give them the chance to respond/whatever
_________________ One day it's going to dawn on the human race that war is as barbaric a means of resolving conflict as cannibalism is as a means of coping with diet deficiencies.
has anyone else managed to post a link to this on any bbc message boards???
I have, but the Bullshitting * Crew never post what I write. Chickens. _________________ The most transparent of all materials on this Earth is a politician.
Joined: 15 Feb 2007 Posts: 36 Location: scotland/holland
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:04 pm Post subject:
Quote:
I have, but the Bullshitting * Crew never post what I write. Chickens.
yeah i think they might have me IP banned
cant think why _________________ One day it's going to dawn on the human race that war is as barbaric a means of resolving conflict as cannibalism is as a means of coping with diet deficiencies.
“On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.
This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.
9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.
What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.
Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.
So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.
Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.
No steel framed skyscraper has ever collapsed due to fire, before or after 9/11, most people who find out about WTC7, believe it was brought down by a controlled demolition, even demolition experts agree.” *911Blogger.com
It’s here!!! The smoking gun of 9/11 that can not be disputed. BBC reporters jump the gun reporting the collapse of WTC7 until they cut the feed just 5 minutes prior to the actual demolition. People, the news is choreographed, this proves it and shows how wide spread the disinfo goes. No more denial, this is it….. they have to strike now. I can’t wait for the spin on this blunder, it will be extremely brazen. The timeline is indeed accurate given the anchor’s comments at 00:17:30 into the video where he states “it has been some 8 hours since the attack.” 9 am plus 8 equals 5 pm !!!!! If this clip is faked, then they did an excellent job and we need to know who did it.
Excellent still Graham,thank you, that female reporter has the westerly sun shining on the right side of her face identically aligned to the sun on the objects (including wtc7) behind her. Can't you tell the time by the sun?
Any response from 'aunty' yet?
Last edited by SHERITON HOTEL on Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
im sorry to be a party pooper but what are we relying on for the time of broadcast? if i reposted this clip on youtube and claimed it was broadcast at 16:25 on 9/11 would anyone know any differant? or just believe me?
i see no clock that usually is inserted on bbc new 24 which they would of switched to for full coverage on the day.
was bbc news 24 around then? im not sure but my point is what are we relying on for broadcast time?
mods should merge this thread with the above to avoid confusion
cheers for the link to make me aware of the other thread.
i just hope what ever points to the broadcast time can be proved beyond doubt and whatever it is that points to the broadcast time needs pointing out as a point of intrest. we cannot trust the graphics telling us the time overlaid by someone else.
So presumably the BBC has made a decision to release this footage from its archive. Is there any way of getting confirmation of this? _________________ Simon - http://www.patriotsquestion911.com/
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: BBC News Cast of 911
How do you figure out what exact time this was broadcast? Is it time stamped anywhere. This is the core issue of this "smoking gun". Where is the exact proof of what exact time it was broadcast. Would the author of this thread please post an answer to this question me and many others have raised?
So presumably the BBC has made a decision to release this footage from its archive. Is there any way of getting confirmation of this?
Looking at the directory list, theres footage in there from a LOT of stations. All in order in 40 min sections. I'll put the list up in a mo. It's quite big. It almost seems like an "autosave" depository for several TV stations.
Last edited by Graham on Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:34 pm; edited 1 time in total
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:31 pm Post subject: Re: BBC News Cast of 911
tomi01uk wrote:
How do you figure out what exact time this was broadcast? Is it time stamped anywhere. This is the core issue of this "smoking gun". Where is the exact proof of what exact time it was broadcast. Would the author of this thread please post an answer to this question me and many others have raised?
This all originates from the Loose Change forum. I posted what was picked up from there. I guess the person who posted it up on the LC forum might be best to get the answer.
At the moment, the time issue is being investigated. I will post any news on this as soon as I hear about it. Sorry I cannot provide the actual answer you are requiring. _________________ The most transparent of all materials on this Earth is a politician.
Don't worry there is blatent headline changing going on at MSN UK even while your reading an article! I read a story, hit the back button for the next link and wow wtf name change
What was this practice in '1984'? _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
just watching it ffs.. how they gonna explain this one.. _________________ REVOLUTION OR REVELATION? For years they have been studying us. The time has come for us to study them!
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:49 pm Post subject:
Skeptic wrote:
hampton wrote:
as there's no clock on the footage, how can we prove what time this aired?
first thing that came to mind
That occurred to me as well, however, you have the scene in background connected to the speech talking about the building already being gone. Hence my question as to whether it was a green screen background.
I've had a look at the higher quality version mpeg and cannot see the 'join' if it is.
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: Re: BBC News Cast of 911
tomi01uk wrote:
How do you figure out what exact time this was broadcast? Is it time stamped anywhere. This is the core issue of this "smoking gun". Where is the exact proof of what exact time it was broadcast. Would the author of this thread please post an answer to this question me and many others have raised?
not exactly what you are looking for, but not far off.
This is a phone call made by a member of the PFT forum - recording made to BBC today, I believe: http://www.pumpitout.com/audio/bbc_oops.mp3 _________________ The most transparent of all materials on this Earth is a politician.
It wasn't there when I there, I'll try again later.
EXCELLENT news though.
Add this to the clip of the BBC reporter talking about a huge pre collapse explosion- we should start harvesting clips of BBC footage supporting 9/11 truth and send it with a box of chocolates to Guy Smith LOL!
ahaha that is jokes. The second woman on the phone is thinking oh shiat... That is if they understood what they he was actually implying, which i actually dont think the people he spoke to understand the significance of.
ahaha that is jokes. The second woman on the phone is thinking oh shiat... That is if they understood what they he was actually implying, which i actually dont think the people he spoke to understand the significance of.
I found the behaviour of those BBC gimps very odd, especially the first woman... clearest case of 'oh *, I must not say anything'. Note how she wanted to cut off as fast as possible?. _________________ The most transparent of all materials on this Earth is a politician.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
It almost seems like an "autosave" depository for several TV stations.