Did BBCNews24 also report WTC7 collapse beforehand?

Headhunter · Last edited by Headhunter on Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:17 am; edited 3 times in total

http://www.911blogger.com/node/6501#comment

This is a story with LEGS folks.

I could NOT believe when I logged on here that I didn't see this topic front and center, with 100's of posts and 1000's of views.

Please take the time to research this BBC FIASCO, and pull together your info and then BLAST it out to every UK newspaper and TV news station.

After all the "hoopla" from their "9/11 Conspiracy File" show, this has GOT to be reported on.

And now they've responded. And their response would suggest that the only possible explanation is that they are clairvoyant.

Blogger has another port on it.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/6482

C'mon our UK 9/11 fellow Truthers, this is a FANTASTIC opportunity to get in the face of the BBC, catching them involved in a cover up.

And no we're not neccessarily saying that they themselves were "in on it" but only that whoever gave them their info as their source WAS, and was handing them the script.

Herre's a discussion thread on it at the Loose Change forums.

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=454 9

Please help MOVE this story, and move is fast, while it's got some MOMENTUM..

It really just broke out yesterday. See what you can do with it by tommorow.

Let's create a presentation on it, with the BBC response, and send it out to ALL the UK papers and News Channels, OK? Eh?

alkmyst · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:40 am Post subject:

From PUMPITOUT.com:

Headhunter · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 1:57 am Post subject:

Don't forget to send in your comments to the BBC regarding this FIASCO!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/02/part_of_the_conspiracy.h tml

Disco_Destroyer · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:09 am Post subject:

The BBCs hands are tied they don't serve the people they serve the power. 1000 acording to press were laid off after the David Kelly incident with another 1000 threated (unsure if it happened) duing the Iraq war!!

Headhunter · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 2:14 am Post subject:

Get in their FACE about this story all throughout the UK media.

How can they NOT report this?

Think about it, and get moving..

This is one HECK of a news story, no matter what anyone thinks about what did or did not happen on 9/11.

Thank you.

Best,

Rob
Headhunter

blackcat · Validated Poster Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376

From a link above:

telecasterisation · Banned Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs

Whilst it all appears incredibly suspicious, the BBC have now semi-responded in exactly the way anticipated - 'Sorry, we made a mistake'. Can someone explain how this isn't now just another interesting anomaly?

There are countless people screaming that we have to pump this out to as many sources as possible and 'Get in the BBC's face'. I have no problem with the concept of telling people whatsoever, however isn't this now just a dead end due to the response of the BBC. We have copies of the broadcast, it looks suspicious, they say they made a mistake - where else can this now go?

What am I missing exactly?

Disco_Destroyer · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:03 am Post subject:

Is there not video evidence of police shoing people away before the collapse??

Disco_Destroyer · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:05 am Post subject:

telecasterisation · Banned Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs

I would add that blackcat's highlighted point surrounding Mr Porter's first point is the only real outstanding issue;

1. We're not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn't get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn't receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

If the BBC did not receive advance information about WTC7, then how exactly, where exactly, did the report originate and why did the footer on the screen clearly state the building had collapsed well before it did?

This totally contradicts Mr Porter's statement, for unless the BBC simply made the report up, it can only have stemmed from a third-party.

karlos · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:43 am Post subject: BBC liars

blackcat · Validated Poster Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376

telecasterisation · Banned Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs

blackcat · Validated Poster Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376

Apparently what they were telling the news agencies was that it looked like it was going to collapse/was collapsing and the BBC confused this message. The advantage was to make the controlled demolition appear to be the result of damage from debris and fire, and not a cd at all.

When I say it was the first to fall ever I am discounting the twin towers, as the usual blurb about them was that they were slammed into by jet aircraft as well so it was not just fire in their case. If the WTC 7 was also because of damage then it has to be explained how it got so damaged. Above all the person/people who put out the message that WTC 7 was collapsing/about to collapse needs to be identified. So far all we hear about are vague references to "firemen" saying it was going to come down. How difficult should it be to identify the individual(s) who informed the news agencies of this impending collapse and get them to explain how they knew?

GEFBASS · Moderate Poster Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 107

I have a rebuttal for BBC answer No:4......

Quote,

"4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of c***-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I'd love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don't help clear up the issue one way or another."

READ YOUR OWN Agreement of the charter !

Right Click and Save as:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/assets/files/pdf/regulatory_framework/ch arter_agreement/bbcagreement_july06.pdf

Item number (86), As a whole but in particular,

(Disclaimer I am writing this section for educational purposes)

subsection (4).

Quote,

"(4) The BBC must not destroy, sell or otherwise dispose of any material that it has broadcast
or otherwise distributed which it decides not to preserve in any archive without first
offering that material, free of charge, to such designated bodies as are engaged in
maintaining sound, television and film archives as it considers appropriate."

Just to add because ultimately "we" the license payer pay for the privilage of you "cocking up".

Thank you BBC.

Geoff.

telecasterisation · Banned Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs

The position we are now in, is that we are picking up on the finer points of charters and definitions, what is the BBC supposed to do balanced against what they have done, this interwoven with accusations and rebuttals.

Unless the source of the information that WTC7 had collapsed is made absolutely clear, then this is over. The BBC say they made a mistake and the tapes are lost - where exactly can this now go?

Graham · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:05 pm Post subject: Re: => The BBC in denial.

John White · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:21 pm Post subject:

John White · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 12:23 pm Post subject:

Stefan · Banned Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1219

Reporting that WTC7 had not collapsed and then finding out it had would be a mistake.

Reporting WTC7 had collapsed and then finding out it hadn't and THEN it collapses is a "coincidence" that certainly warrants picking up on.

The key in all this is not making wild claims that the BBC were "in on" 9/11 that the evidence does not support.

The key is in pressuring the BBC to reveal where their information came from. If, as I'm sure we all suspect, it was a government press release then we have something.

sabretache · New Poster Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 2

First post here.

I've followed this on the various US sites too. There can be little doubt that the BBC were told by a trusted source (no verification necessary) that WTC7 had collapsed some 20 minutes before it actually did because there were none of the usual caveats. Both the captioning and voice reporting for 'News24' and the standard BBC News, are unambiguous and the background to Jane Stanley's 'live' report seems to have been genuinely live too (rather than old pre-recorded stuff) - with WTC7 right there in the background as she discussed the reasons for its collapse - in fairness to her she never mentions WTC7 - just the damage to a hotel building and the devastation generally - almost as though she didn't know about the anchor-man's opening remarks and specific question about WTC7 . It's the studio anchor man who is categoric about it.

If this as serious as, on the face of it, it appears - I expect the BBC to get their story straight with government first. Post-Hutton, they are quite simply NOT a trusted source where matters of sensitive official government matters are concerned.

QuitTheirClogs · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 3:19 pm Post subject:

sabretache · New Poster Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 2

This is a pretty comprehensive resume of the issue to date with explanations of why the timings can be relied upon:

http://www.wtc7.net/foreknowledge.html#bbc

reprehensor · Minor Poster Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 36

Hey guys, if you see Physicist hanging around, please ask him where this video came from:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-770929074608938354&hl=en-GB

911Veritas says it does not come from the Internet Archive data dump.

disco volante · Minor Poster Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 37

Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/280207timestamp.htm

Micpsi · Moderate Poster Joined: 13 Feb 2007 Posts: 505

physicist · Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:06 pm Post subject:

GEFBASS · Moderate Poster Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 107

???????

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-770929074608938354&hl=en-GB

Welcome to the free world......

GEFBASS · Moderate Poster Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 107

This one works and there is a few more being uploaded.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lWQ5cJ5XYY

Geoff.

Carlos · Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:44 am Post subject:

	9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> WTC7 Salomon Brothers Building - the smoking gun of 9/11	All times are GMT Goto page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2