View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
thought criminal Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 574 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:05 pm Post subject: Have the masses been hypnotised? |
|
|
This rife denial is going to be our biggest barrier. Why do other scientists fail to see the truth of what Steven E. Jones is demonstrating?. What has happened? It's almost like we are in a film, the majority of society have been hypnotised and some of them appear to NOT be stirring from this slumber. What has caused it, is it 'trauma induced'? Surely it is this particular nut we need to crack because it wont matter how much evidence there is, 'the sleepers' will be blind to it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alkmyst Moderate Poster
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 177 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:45 pm Post subject: Two Versions of Reality |
|
|
Hi Thought Criminal,
The question that you pose is one that would seem to baffle those on both sides of 9/11 question. Those within the 9/11 Truth Movement cannot comprehend how some people can fail to see the most obvious evidence pointing to 9/11 being an 'inside job'; whereas those who accept the official version of events, are incredulous at the ridiculous claims of the 'Conspiraloons'.
The issue should not be one of philosophy; but the 9/11 Sceptics are crying,"...but look at the evidence!" The other side saying, "What is there to see?"
We seem to be experiencing two very different interpretations of the available 'physical evidence'.
Consider the possibility that there are currently two distinct versions of reality existing alongside of each other, sharing a single physical realm.
Perhaps we are all facing a choice as to the version in which we elect to participate? If this is the case, then neither version is 'right' or 'wrong'; it just 'is'.
Do we elect to co-create a world based upon an everlasting 'War on Terror', potentially leading to the 'Clash of Civilisations' (which would seem to be the desire of those who put their name to documents such as 'Rebuilding America's Defenses')... or do we elect to co-create an 'Alliance of Civilisations'?
There is an ancient Zen saying which goes like this; 'The greatest gift that any person can offer, to accelerate the development of your Soul, is to be your enemy."
Perverse though it may seem, is it not possible that G.W.B & co. are playing the role of catalyst to facilitate something that is beyond the comprehension of the secular, empirical or material world?
Ultimately, the choice is ours.
Al K Myst |
|
Back to top |
|
|
thought criminal Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 574 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:52 pm Post subject: Re: Two Versions of Reality |
|
|
alkmyst wrote: | Hi Thought Criminal,
The question that you pose is one that would seem to baffle those on both sides of 9/11 question. Those within the 9/11 Truth Movement cannot comprehend how some people can fail to see the most obvious evidence pointing to 9/11 being an 'inside job'; whereas those who accept the official version of events, are incredulous at the ridiculous claims of the 'Conspiraloons'.
The issue should not be one of philosophy; but the 9/11 Sceptics are crying,"...but look at the evidence!" The other side saying, "What is there to see?"
We seem to be experiencing two very different interpretations of the available 'physical evidence'.
Consider the possibility that there are currently two distinct versions of reality existing alongside of each other, sharing a single physical realm.
Perhaps we are all facing a choice as to the version in which we elect to participate? If this is the case, then neither version is 'right' or 'wrong'; it just 'is'.
Do we elect to co-create a world based upon an everlasting 'War on Terror', potentially leading to the 'Clash of Civilisations' (which would seem to be the desire of those who put their name to documents such as 'Rebuilding America's Defenses')... or do we elect to co-create an 'Alliance of Civilisations'?
There is an ancient Zen saying which goes like this; 'The greatest gift that any person can offer, to accelerate the development of your Soul, is to be your enemy."
Perverse though it may seem, is it not possible that G.W.B & co. are playing the role of catalyst to facilitate something that is beyond the comprehension of the secular, empirical or material world?
Ultimately, the choice is ours.
Al K Myst |
Oh absolutely, I do agree that 9/11 was a catalyst for the planet's spiritual awakening. I beleive 9/11 was supposed to happen, this whole period 2006-2012 is called the apocalypse and I suppose people are waking up at different times. It is a fascinating, albeit frustrating, anthropology, though. Y'know, how come we woke up first?
It's a funny old world. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 1158 Location: South Essex
|
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2006 6:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't know about the scientific comunity doubters, but the whole official 911 scenario was horrific enough for most.Now these other nutters are talking about other possibilities that could undermine our faith in our own
leaders, our future our mortality and so on.
That would be even more horrific than 911 itself to contemplate.
NI |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|