The 9/11 Solution - new 911 Truth film

[TonyGosling]

Planted Stories - new 10 minute 911 Truth film

The 911 Solution - The big clue everybody missed
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2792830342831749576

[Mr-Bridger]

I found this film on Con central tracker and according to the maker he was having probs trying it uploaded on Youtube, so after viewing i submitted it myself to Google and so far its still live heres the info the maker gave on Con central :

The 9/11 Solution

The big clue everyone missed

How the key 9/11 myths were implanted
This video was removed from Google Video on February 13, 2007 without
explanation.





YouTube blocked my attempt to publish it this morning (February 14).

Before it was removed, this page received 19,802 visits in four days.

I have read Google's terms of service and in no way does this video
violate any of them.

I am the creator of this video and its copyright owner. The video's
content is not illegal, obscene, an invasion of anyone's privacy, an
incitement to hate or a graphic potrayal of violence.

Here's an explanation of what Google is preventing you from seeing:

Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly documented, specifically:

1) The stand down of US air defense on the morning of 9/11 that
permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly erratically and in restricted
air space without challenge

2) Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1,
#2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition

A third significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone
acknowledged: the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the
first few hours immediately after the attacks.

Specifically:

1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the lifestyle
and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both towers were
still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused by anyone.

2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye witness who explained in
strangely formal language the science behind why the towers collapsed
when most engineers and firemen were utterly baffled and in shock by
what had just taken place.

3. CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as
such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and
viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive charges
placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way they did.

How was it that these stories - based on no fact, no research and no
inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly on US news networks
and then became part of the core myths of what happened on 9/11?

Were these stories prepared in advance?

There's an old intelligence saying that "once is happenstance, twice is
coincidence, but three times is enemy action."

Because most of these clips ran only once and were not repeated after
they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if not impossible, for
viewers to analyze them critically.

Now, thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately
started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important
evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been
anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to exert
strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US news
networks.

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/80.html