View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ignatz Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 918
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
dh wrote: | Anyway folks. I won't too much accuse of shill because that's bad practice
But I still await some evidence, pure, bold, factual, photographic, - of these "persistant contrails" before the mid to late nineties.
Let's have a persistant contrail from a 1986 jet, a 1973 jet, a 1968 jet - something please just to cast a little doubt in my mind
I've been asking for this misperceived chemtrail info for the past 4 years and noone has provided any satisfactory answer in visual terms up to now
Perhaps you can |
Perhaps you could offer just one scrap of evidence that :
a. Thousands of planes, world-wide, are fitted with chemtrail tanks
b. Thousands of people in factories, distribution depots and airports do the production, transport, loading and spraying
c. There are 'interesting' chemicals in chemtrails.
Shouldn't be hard. Report back. Off you go. _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
Back to top |
|
|
London Mick Moderate Poster
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 139 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Moderators, what is this Ignaatz bloke doing here? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ignatz Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 918
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
London Mick wrote: | Moderators, what is this Ignaatz bloke doing here? |
Discussing chemtrails. Looks obvious to me.
Here's an alternative mechanism, photographed over the Arctic. Gotta keep them polar bears under control !!
_________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thermate Angel - now passed away
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Need an OFF-TOPIC section badly. Of the top4 threads in this General(911) section, we have:
Chemtrails, Depleted uranium and Global warming.
Distract much? _________________ Make love, not money. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 932 Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, so many responses and where to start?
I see no one tried to respond to my maths. Is anyone going to deny that from cruising altitude you need 80,000 litres of chemical to produce a one part per billion concentration over a 5 x 5 mile area?
And those photos, they show persistant spreading contrails. What proof do you have that what those photos are showing is a trail of mind bending chemicals, and not a contrail?
and for this
Quote: | Pixels cracks me up:
Its essentially "Chem trails can't exist, becuase I say so, even though I hav'nt seen any |
Yes I have. I'm not saying that there aren't big trails spreading out from behind aircraft. I'm saying that they're nothing more than exhaust gas.
Quote: | and cant know what goes on everywhere, but anyone saying they have is just a loony. |
And you do know what is going on everywhere? You seem to "know" that these trails are chemicals. What is your proof for this?
Quote: | Even if I did see one:I'd tell myself I'd seen something else. My government would certainly tell me if they were spraying stuff around the place, |
You're not making sense. I've seen what you think is a chemtrail, and it EXACTLY matches a persistant spreading contrail. It also only ever appears during the same conditions as those contrails appear. But be my guest, download the high altitude weather and an appleman chart from that NASA site, and show me them occurring outside the predicted envelope.
Quote: | just like they asked the vietnamese for permission to spray them with agent orange back in nam. |
Haven't you noticed how low agent orange was sprayed? Do you just ignore that fact?
Quote: | Ha! I'm special! I'd never be treated like someone who doesnt matter!"
Poor deluded man |
You're the one that thinks he's stumbled onto a goverment conspiracy and thinks he's on his way to saving the world from it. _________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 932 Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dh wrote: | Anyway folks. I won't too much accuse of shill because that's bad practice
But I still await some evidence, pure, bold, factual, photographic, - of these "persistant contrails" before the mid to late nineties.
Let's have a persistant contrail from a 1986 jet, a 1973 jet, a 1968 jet - something please just to cast a little doubt in my mind
I've been asking for this misperceived chemtrail info for the past 4 years and noone has provided any satisfactory answer in visual terms up to now
Perhaps you can |
You want me to find photos from the 60s, 70s or 80s or contrails?
Ok, For me to find them, someone in the 60s-80s must have take an a photo of a contrail, and then decided to scan it into their computer, and put it on the internet. On the regular persons list of things to do, digging out old pictures of the sky and putting them on the internet doesn't rate very highly.
But here's one from NASA
Here's one from the 50s
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes well these show trails of some sort leaving jet engines but are hardly conclusive of anything, as nobody disputes the existence of contrails. I don't actually dispute the existence of persistant contrails, though I think these are entirely distinguishable from chemtrails, imo.
Anyway, surely National Geographic or one of those magazines that shows a lot of land and sky scape photos will have some coincidental shots of the odd persistant contrail in their archive material. Sure there werent so many jets, but if this is what the phenomenon is there ought to be the odd one or two in shots.
Mind you I've looked on a number of websites, and leafed various old magazines such as NG and Beautiful British Columbia and Yorkshire Life or whatever it is and can't come up with any
The best a couple of guys working the Above Top Secret boards 24/7, attacking 9/11 truthism and chemtrail theory as their main targets, suggestive of a tie-in in the agency mind perhaps - any doubting mods, was some dirty dog fighters from World War II and a painting from some military museum
Still, I'm sure someone will surprise me sooner or later
Suggestion - watch some Eighties or Seventies movies on the telly that feature outdoor shots and keep an eye on the sky. I'd be grateful to hear of any sightings
By the way, Ignaatz challenged me earlier on to provide proof of modifications to airplanes by the thousand to show that this phenomenon is real. That's hardly the point. I don't know how they do it. There exists somewhere some footage of what appears to be an orb laying chemtrails. I think that exists in the chemtrails central archives of a couple of years ago, and was taken by someone I'm since out of touch with. Will try to track it down if anyone wants _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 932 Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is that chemtrails can't be distinguished from persistent spreading contrails, because all the photos that have been posted of chemtrails, and that I've ever seen anywhere of chemtrails, have been photos of spreading contrails, there is no difference.
Now that the weather is a bit nicer and there's some contrails to be seen I will try to get some photos of aircraft leaving them, both spreading ("chemtrail" style) and non spreading. _________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Emmanuel Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 434
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject: IM NOT PARANOID BUT... |
|
|
Most people don't notice chemtrails as tv advertising and films are full of them as a symbol of normality.
For years I have been asking supposed observant, intelligent people to look up and see what has happened to our sunshine and they dont want to know.
I have now accepted that this is the condition of our air quality now and make the most of clear days when I can.
For a nation that is obsessed with weather I am not sure why so few people vocalise that the fluffy clouds of before have almost disappeared.
Its hard to imagine but the people who have introduced chemtrails are big on multitasking. There are probably more embedded side affects and reasons to employ an air force to fly planes back and forth every hour of the day all over nato governed lands...
1 Creating cloud cover to lower temperature
2 Preventing rainfall
3 Limiting human beings depth of vision, shuts down the higher conscious part of the brain. (Blue skies inspire)
4 Getting rid of barium and other toxic matter into the lungs of unsuspecting population
5 Causing sickness, flu like symptoms, dizziness, respiratory problems, death
6 Causing general tiredness and apathy
More about chemtrails here:
http://educate-yourself.org/ct/
http://carnicom.com/
Take colloidal silver to cut short any nasty fungal toxic flu like ilness. Peace out _________________ www.freecycle.org
www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com
http://www.viking-z.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ignatz Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 918
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here's a thought...
Contrails are very clearly seen to be originating from aircraft engines (not surprisingly)
Unless these "chemtrail" tanks - or a feed pipe - are built into the engine assemblies, then the trail will not appear to be coming from the engines. (I'd hazard a guess that mixing chemicals with seriously hot aircraft exhaust would quite probably be quite bad for the chemicals ).
A high-powered camera should be capable of spotting the tell-tale sign of the trail issuing from the "wrong" place. Despite bumping into a lot of chemtrail references on CT sites, I've yet to see this kind of photographic evidence. Why is that? It should be a damn sight easier to procure than some 1960's skyscape that somebody has bothered to shove on the 'net. _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 932 Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:12 pm Post subject: Re: IM NOT PARANOID BUT... |
|
|
Jacob wrote: |
For a nation that is obsessed with weather I am not sure why so few people vocalise that the fluffy clouds of before have almost disappeared.
|
You mean these clouds?
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 932 Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ignatz wrote: | Here's a thought...
Contrails are very clearly seen to be originating from aircraft engines (not surprisingly)
Unless these "chemtrail" tanks - or a feed pipe - are built into the engine assemblies, then the trail will not appear to be coming from the engines. (I'd hazard a guess that mixing chemicals with seriously hot aircraft exhaust would quite probably be quite bad for the chemicals ).
A high-powered camera should be capable of spotting the tell-tale sign of the trail issuing from the "wrong" place. Despite bumping into a lot of chemtrail references on CT sites, I've yet to see this kind of photographic evidence. Why is that? It should be a damn sight easier to procure than some 1960's skyscape that somebody has bothered to shove on the 'net. |
I'll volunteer to try to get some, I've got a 70-300mm zoom lens, but it depends on the weather really.
A tell tale sign of chemtrails should be that they appear right behind the aircraft. Contrails don't because the exhaust gas is hot, and so needs time to cool in the atmosphere before it freezes, so they form slightly behind the plane. Chemtrail chemicals should be cold already, and a diffusion system that sprays them into the air will cool them even more, due to the spray effect. (try putting hot water in a spray bottle, cold water comes out) They should therefore form right behind the nozzle. _________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johnny Pixels Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Jul 2006 Posts: 932 Location: A Sooper Sekrit Bunker
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is an example of a contrail forming behind the plane slightly, as it must cool before freezing to form the trail. This was taken with a 55mm lens, so the 300mm should give a lot more detail, assuming the weather is right, I manage to spot some planes, and I have my camera on me.
_________________
I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth. - Umberto Eco
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Conclusive in my book, though it is only reportage, is that you can clear your skies with a combination of a cloudbusterand an organised and complete comprehensive mobile phone mast towerbusting in your local area
The West Yorkshire skies are very healthy at the moment to the west due to the deployment of one or two cloud/chembusters in the area, and the systematic taking out of the majority of mobile and Tetra mast in the west of West Yorkshire by a dedicated person
The DOR is the component part that matters most and if we draw and transform that to OR we restore health to the skies and ourselves
None of the scummy argumentative nonsense being posted by Pixels or Ignatz supercedes working it for yourself
I've not seen a chemtrail whiteout around here for a long time _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction
Last edited by paul wright on Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:18 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 1158 Location: South Essex
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
utopiated wrote: | I was discussing this with someone the other day - the fact that we're so zoned-in to our own day-2-day existence, planes can formation fly the skies above our heads and make lattice-like structures and 99% of us filter it out!!
Andrew J's Lattice formation - Borrowash - still the best demonstration of grid patterns used by aerosol spraying. |
Not exactly typical,but extreme example.
And it was back this morning over south essex.
Shame not many question those strange formations in the sky,conditioning?
Oh those are just contrails that last for hours,an everyday occurance? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
utopiated Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 645 Location: UK Midlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:30 am Post subject: Re: God's bods of Zion |
|
|
TonyGosling wrote: | I agree this is getting too much - though I actually reckon DU is not off topic enough to be zapped
What do we mods do? I ould shifthis entire topic off into the invisible holding zone for mods to discuss but no users would know what we were up to...
Can some sane person suggest something to any/all of us by PM please.
|
Tony has spoken everyone - DU is "OK" - everything else isn't.
Actually - the topics that surround wider issues of staged terror are the only thing that keep me coming back here... because let's face it - we're getting a bit desperate for "On Topic" issues and discussion lately.
Think I'll leave you all to it. Good luck. _________________ http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:41 am Post subject: Re: God's bods of Zion |
|
|
utopiated wrote: | TonyGosling wrote: | I agree this is getting too much - though I actually reckon DU is not off topic enough to be zapped
What do we mods do? I ould shifthis entire topic off into the invisible holding zone for mods to discuss but no users would know what we were up to...
Can some sane person suggest something to any/all of us by PM please.
|
Tony has spoken everyone - DU is "OK" - everything else isn't.
Actually - the topics that surround wider issues of staged terror are the only thing that keep me coming back here... because let's face it - we're getting a bit desperate for "On Topic" issues and discussion lately.
Think I'll leave you all to it. Good luck. |
Actually utopiated
You have a good sustainable point of view
You are one of those who keep this forum bouncing. I dont think this is an appropriate time to leave _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ian neal Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005 Posts: 3140 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Johnny and ignatz
Please post only in critics corner in future. By all means start a thread in critics corner about chemtrails. Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
utopiated Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 645 Location: UK Midlands
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:50 am Post subject: Re: God's bods of Zion |
|
|
dh wrote: |
Actually utopiated
You have a good sustainable point of view
You are one of those who keep this forum bouncing. I dont think this is an appropriate time to leave |
Thanks - but I'm more than a little tired of those who want to narrow agendas, fail to see connections and decide that a few threads amongst hundreds need removing, side-lining, rectifying, indexing, stamping and filing away elsewhere.
There's something else at work here besides the tired argument that these discussions 'put the movement in a bad light'. I think some 9/11 researchers have made the cause a bit too personal and they just can't bare to see it tainted - even when nothing of the sort is going on. It really has developed it's own set of ridgid operating rules and norms because of this and it brings out the worst side in people. _________________ http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:04 am Post subject: Re: God's bods of Zion |
|
|
utopiated wrote: | dh wrote: |
Actually utopiated
You have a good sustainable point of view
You are one of those who keep this forum bouncing. I dont think this is an appropriate time to leave |
Thanks - but I'm more than a little tired of those who want to narrow agendas, fail to see connections and decide that a few threads amongst hundreds need removing, side-lining, rectifying, indexing, stamping and filing away elsewhere.
There's something else at work here besides the tired argument that these discussions 'put the movement in a bad light'. I think some 9/11 researchers have made the cause a bit too personal and they just can't bare to see it tainted - even when nothing of the sort is going on. It really has developed it's own set of ridgid operating rules and norms because of this and it brings out the worst side in people. |
That and the likes of hateful people is why I haven't ever been able to respond to an invitation to be a mod here. Sorry mods - I particularly respect you all, but as I've not been able to respond privately I might as well respond publicly.
I've got a certain disregard of people here sowing seeds of doubt and despondency
I don't think that the topics should be restricted. There are all sorts of relevant offshoots. 9/11 is the key but not the be all and end all
Stay with it utopiated _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jackamo New Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 8 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: Nottingham Today:'Scuse me while I criss the sky |
|
|
'Scuse Me While I Criss The Sky
What seems to scare people so much about discussing the phenomena of "chemtrails" on here that a threat to "pull" the topic is issued?
Are we been asked to evacuate the nine-eleven.co.uk building for our own safety?
Given the fact, this thread runs to over five pages, it is hardly because there is a lack of interest in discussing the topic. So why the threat?
For my two cents, its about who has the power and control to decide which issues are objects of "legitimate" discussion and which are not on this forum. Reading through the posts, its interesting that the very people who have already decided a priori that "chemtrails" do not exist are the ones calling for an end to any discussion or exploration of the phenomena.
If you already know with absolute one hundred percent certainty that a covert op isnt taking place under the guise of normal contrail behaviour, then whats the harm in those of us who don't possess your certainty and assurance from discussing the topic.
Isnt it also interesting that there is often a correlation between those who pronounce certainty on any given subject [such as the fact they KNOW 100% that thermate was used to bring down the towers despite the fact they were not present on the day, not involved with the planning of the operation and not privy to any insider knowledge concerning black budget technological breakthroughs] and the people who decide what is acceptable to discuss on this forum and what isn't. Just an observation thats all.
[btw - thats not to say thermate wasn't used to bring down the towers, either as a primary cause or as an adjunct to another technology, but do I know that with any degree of absolute certainty? How could I?]
Regardless of the ontological status of chemtrails in terms of whether they "really" exist or not, is the topic so heretical now that we cannot even discuss the sociological dimension of the phenomena?
Or are the conceptual flames of any discussion about the "chemtrail phenomena" so out of control, that the topic needs to be "pulled" for our own well being?
Even if one denies the validity of the concept that a global covert operation is taking place right under our very noses, which utilises the phenomena of "contrails" as its outward "cover". I for one find it fascinating that myself and thousands of people all over the world are observing and photographing these lattice like "structures" in the sky under the "delusion" that this is a new phenomena. Given the fact the "debunkers" insist these lattices and crosses have always existed in the sky, then surely this "collective amnesia" or perhaps "collective hallucination" on the part of those who take the photographs and write about the phenomena is a fact worthy of study alone.
I for one am fascinated by the fact I cannot remember seeing these grids and crosses in the sky until a couple of years ago. Over my many years I do remember seeing thousands of planes leaving trails behind them which dissipated rather quickly. I still see this phenomena today and it looks pretty much how its always looked. These grids and crosses seem different both in terms of form and structure.
Below are some images I hallucinated in the skies above Nottingham today
best wishes
paul
www.utopiated.net
BTW - showing a picture of a single plane [or multiple planes for that matter] from any era emitting a con-trail as proof that the phenomena of chemtrails doesnt exist [in the form of multiple planes criss-crossing the sky to create long lasting lattice and grid like structures] is the logical equivalent of showing the picture of the Mannlicher-Carcano bolt-action rifle resting against a box in the Texas School Book Depository in Dealey Plaza as proof Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin.
It completely ignores the technical capability of Oswald to fire the necessary shots in the requisite time, it ignores the fact Oswald was, in his own words a "patsy" and it ignores the wider milieu surrounding the assassination. Likewise, showing a plane or planes emitting contrails ignores both the capability and intent to carry out a covert operation under the guise of normal contrails and it ignores the lattice like grids that are the signature mark of any "chemtrail" operation.
Background information:
The images below were taken of the skies above Nottingham City today on 9th March 2007 between 3:03pm and 3:08pm. These crosses and lattices are a regular feature of the Nottingham sky line.
What was interesting today was the fact I recieved information that the skies over Peterborough [about 50 miles south of Nottingham] were also the subject of this lattice like "spraying". This occured about an hour before the pictures were taken so I had a chance to observe the sky between 2:00pm and 3:00pm.
Apart from the odd plane emitting the usual short acting contrail phenomena and a few clouds, the skies were clear. Suddenly, in the space of five minutes multiple planes appeared and began criss-crossing the entire sky, leaving thick trails of long lasting appearance [the lattice like structures could still be observed two hours later] and then the planes disappeared as fast as they arrived.
Now, maybe it is in the realms of possibility that these multiple planes criss crossing the sky were part of some kind of exercise that took place coincidentally as the sky's atmospherics changed so dramatically [in the space of an hour] that it caused trails from the planes to form [this is the argument used by debunkers to explain why these "contrails" do not dissipate quickly - its all down to atmospheric conditions apparently]
Remember, in the previous hour, the few planes I saw were flying at a similar altitude and were leaving the classic short-lasting contrail, then all of a sudden things changed...Anyway, after the planes disappeared I called a friend in Mansfield [12 miles north of Nottingham] because usually, the lattices also form over this town too.
On this occasion, he reported no sky grids and said the planes he could see in the sky were emitting the short duration contrails. So if these trails are simply the epiphenomena of atmospheric conditions, they took place in a twelve mile bubble!
Given the fact I have observed, documented and photographed these sky grids over Nottingham at least twelve times in the last year [and observed on many other occasions without documenting] the debunkers are asking me to believe it is simple coincidence that on every single one of those days the planes decided to radically alter their flight paths [they do not usually cross each other on multiple occasions within a very short duration of time usually as far as I can observe] on the very days a special set of atmospheric conditions were occuring that allowed these trails of long duration to form.
The image below was taken from www.chemtrailsuk.net. We are currently seeking volunteers to document and photograph these lattice like structures which appear all over the UK skies. We hope to discover patterns of coherence in regards to this phenomena whilst simultaneously accepting the possibility we are labouring under collective delusion
For more information contact webmaster@chemtrailsuk.net
Note: all images and video taken on a Sony Erricson 608i. Because of the poor quality of the pictures, the contrast was adjusted in photoshop. No other manipulation was made.
_________________ "Time is a child at play, moving pieces in a board game; the kingly power is a child's"
Heraclitus [52nd Fragment] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jackamo New Poster
Joined: 10 Aug 2006 Posts: 8 Location: Nottingham
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:42 am Post subject: 'Scuse me while I criss the sky - Part Two |
|
|
Various Images of Long Lasting Lattice and Cross Formations over the skies of Nottingham and Mansfield in the last year:
I think these few examples taken over the last year show the possibility that the lattice signatures of a "chemtrail operation" are more than mere random patterns generated by individual and unorganised flight paths.
It can be suggested that a design and intelligence is at work here.
paul
www.utopiated.net _________________ "Time is a child at play, moving pieces in a board game; the kingly power is a child's"
Heraclitus [52nd Fragment] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Emmanuel Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 434
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ignatz,
What bit dont you understand?
I dont live near an airport, why are aeroplanes going back and forth, sometimes creating crosses exactly over towns and even strange curving paths.
Also the spraying is not on permanently I have seen it definitely stop and start. Please, flying a plane is not the same as revving up a car!
I have seen this atrocious behaviour all over europe. Here is the same * goin on in Italy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NbqZy-8FGg&mode=related&search= |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Emmanuel Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Oct 2006 Posts: 434
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another video here to catch more chemtrail action.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocm9fDaO9-M
Somebody has posted an interesting quote there too.
"Near the day of Purification, there will be cobwebs spun back and forth in the sky"
-Hopi Indian Prophecy |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ignatz Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 918
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jacob wrote: | Ignatz,
What bit dont you understand?
I dont live near an airport, why are aeroplanes going back and forth, sometimes creating crosses exactly over towns and even strange curving paths.
|
All you need is to live near a regular flight path, and who doesn't these days?
Passengers out of Cardiff airport :
1962 - 100,000
2006 - 2,000,000
And - how many people were hopping on a jet for a winter break in Lanzarote back in 1962? (still, clear winter's day - ideal contrail weather)
Of course there are far more contrails these days.
p.s. when planes change course, they do it in a curved manner. _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scar Moderate Poster
Joined: 25 Feb 2006 Posts: 724 Location: Brighton
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dh wrote: |
But I still await some evidence, pure, bold, factual, photographic, - of these "persistant contrails" before the mid to late nineties.
Let's have a persistant contrail from a 1986 jet, a 1973 jet, a 1968 jet - something please just to cast a little doubt in my mind
I've been asking for this misperceived chemtrail info for the past 4 years and noone has provided any satisfactory answer in visual terms up to now
Perhaps you can |
Surely a pretty simple request there and yet immediately other proofs are feverishly demanded by our debunking addicts. Interesting.
Cant ya find these pictures then chaps? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
London Mick Moderate Poster
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 139 Location: London
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another glorious day here in London. Huge blue sky and not a chemtrail in sight. Are they giving us a break for some reason? It's been like this all week now. Loads of planes flying around but no chemtrails. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scar wrote: | dh wrote: |
But I still await some evidence, pure, bold, factual, photographic, - of these "persistant contrails" before the mid to late nineties.
Let's have a persistant contrail from a 1986 jet, a 1973 jet, a 1968 jet - something please just to cast a little doubt in my mind
I've been asking for this misperceived chemtrail info for the past 4 years and noone has provided any satisfactory answer in visual terms up to now
Perhaps you can |
Surely a pretty simple request there and yet immediately other proofs are feverishly demanded by our debunking addicts. Interesting.
Cant ya find these pictures then chaps? |
No they cant scar because they don't exist. I've searched myself and asked debunkers over and again. They haven't come up with anything up to now.
I really hope someone will prove me wrong
My own personal theory of chemtrails is that it's an attempt not so much to poison the populace, though that happens as a side effect of the droppings from the soup, which not only contains Barium Carbonate and aluminium salts but the all important mycoplasmas and blood cells and the like, but rather that it's an attempt to produce a persistant ionospheric oil-based DOR-transmitting emulsion, through which HAARP waves will be transmitted via the mobile masts/cell towers network, with the aim of damping down the ascending vibrational frequencies that the etheric field is emitting
In order for the controlling elite to sustain their guises and to keep the world's population enthralled and numbed. They're trying to bypass the 2012 uprising
The only workable way to counteract this I've found so far is via the Croftian orgone devices _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Newspeak International Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Apr 2006 Posts: 1158 Location: South Essex
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well I'm pleased that the mods decide to reinstate this thread,I was loosing interest for the same reasons utopiated stated.
This is a phenomenon that exists,it is in the sky above us almost everyday,and it is part of the whole positioning of the NWO objectives and to deny it denies the truth.
An important call by the mods imo. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|