| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ringwind
Minor Poster
Joined: 18 Mar 2006
Posts: 18
Location: Joplin, Missouri
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 9:58 pm Post subject: No Big Boeings Crashed (NBB) |
 |
|
| Google Search: (NBB) by Morgan Reynolds |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wokeman
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 881
Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ringwind,
Yes, I'm nearly there on that one. The images of the "planes" hitting the WTC do not react they way they should, something that hits a solid building does not react like a knife slicing through butter. If that's the case, then what we saw were images and not planes. Yet, you can't say that in a pub (bar) in the UK. You're written off as a candidate for the funny farm. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KP50
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 526
Location: NZ
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wokeman wrote: | Ringwind,
Yes, I'm nearly there on that one. The images of the "planes" hitting the WTC do not react they way they should, something that hits a solid building does not react like a knife slicing through butter. If that's the case, then what we saw were images and not planes. Yet, you can't say that in a pub (bar) in the UK. You're written off as a candidate for the funny farm. |
How do you know the building was solid when the "plane" collided with it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wokeman
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 881
Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I presume it was a steel and concrete building. I was using a simile, "like a knife through butter". I didn't suggest it was made of butter!. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KP50
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 526
Location: NZ
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wokeman wrote: | | I presume it was a steel and concrete building. I was using a simile, "like a knife through butter". I didn't suggest it was made of butter!. |
What I mean is - at the point of impact, how do you know that the steel and concrete hadn't already been weakened in some manner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Snowygrouch
Validated Poster
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 628
Location: Oxford
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I`ve already posted substantial evidence on this one including a mathematical stress calculation showing the plane would have caused the failure of beams it came into contact with.
Analysis by S.Jones has in fact proven that decelleration is measurable in the impact film.
The plane behaves axactly as one would expect in this scenario.
Sorry to rain on your parade. Reynolds anlalysis is flawed, scientifically defunct and poorly researched. End of story. Sorry!
C.
_________________
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist
President Eisenhower 1961 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Leiff
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 509
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wokeman wrote: | | The images of the "planes" hitting the WTC do not react they way they should, something that hits a solid building does not react like a knife slicing through butter. |
Its hard to say what an aircraft slamming into a building should look like and in any case the towers were not solid.
_________________
"Democracy is sustained not by public trust but by public scepticism"
George Monbiot |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
