| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:15 am Post subject: Fires in WTC5 or WTC6 caused most of the smoke around WTC7 |
 |
|
New photos posted on the George Washington's blog indicate that most of the smoke around WTC7 came from fires in WTC5 or WTC6. This demolishes the argument of defenders of the official story of 9/11 that raging fires implied by this large amount of smoke brought down WTC7.
See the photos at http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/...m-wtc-7_19.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigyin
Minor Poster
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 48
Location: Central Scotland
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Link not working |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/03/smoke-did-not-come-from-w tc-7_19.html
interesting comment:
| Quote: | | I don't even think that the smoke is relevant at all. Those fires shouldn't be there anyway. I mean, if WTC 1 and 2 just collapsed, those small pockets of fire started by the planes would have been extinguished, and nothing would even come close to starting a fire in a building as far away as WTC 7. Those fires just add to the fact that something "un-natural" happened. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KP50
Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 526
Location: NZ
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| scubadiver wrote: | http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2007/03/smoke-did-not-come-from-w tc-7_19.html
interesting comment:
| Quote: | | I don't even think that the smoke is relevant at all. Those fires shouldn't be there anyway. I mean, if WTC 1 and 2 just collapsed, those small pockets of fire started by the planes would have been extinguished, and nothing would even come close to starting a fire in a building as far away as WTC 7. Those fires just add to the fact that something "un-natural" happened. |
|
It seems certain that the fires started prior to collapse as per my thread
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=61842#61842
and if you take a look at the layout, it doesn't seem possible for the debris from WTC2 to have reached WTC7 especially as it wasn't on the direct path. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
