7/7 - Still no CCTV or eyewitnesses

paul wright · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:49 am Post subject:

You'd do well just to argue the toss rather than condemn contributors
Nobody minds dissenters - we need them
Its the endless circular arguments and aggressive denials that need to be avoided

johndoe · Wrecker Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 181

looks like some of you owe me a little apology.

when i said the police won't release evidence during an ongoing investigation you lot tried to claim the case was closed and noone else was being pursued and no other suspects were wanted.

but today...... 3 were arrested. that would make me right and you lot wrong. ah well you can't win them all.

so it looks like the case is open and the police may be a little unwilling to release evidence before going to court.

ZUCO · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:29 pm Post subject:

It must be nice in fantasy land. We see examples of evidence released during investigations all the time. I remember in this thread somebody mentioning "Crimewatch" as an example. Do you disagree that this show releases evidence to the public before a trial? If so, what is it doing? You're not right and we're not wrong. For all we know, the men could be released tomorrow. Time will tell but NOT A SINGLE SOUL OWES YOU AN APOLOGY so I wouldn't expect to be receiving one any time soon.

numeral · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 7:31 pm Post subject:

If the arrests are followed by charges, the criminal case will take precedence over the inquests which are scheduled for June. It then could be two or three years before the inquests are held. The evidence is being well bottled up.

johndoe · Wrecker Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 181

"I remember in this thread somebody mentioning "Crimewatch" as an example."

crimewatch is allowed as it is used to aid in the apprehension of a suspect at large. that is very different from releasing whatever evidence people see fit.

"Time will tell but NOT A SINGLE SOUL OWES YOU AN APOLOGY so I wouldn't expect to be receiving one any time soon. "

i think you'll find a few people wrongly claimed the case was closed.

ZUCO · Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2007 11:55 pm Post subject:

The four men are dead, there is still no reason for not releasing the CCTV. The fact still remains that releasing CCTV footage of the four alleged bombers would not in any way jeapordise a case against others that have been arrested recently. There is still no justifiable reason for the withholding of the footage, other than it not actually existing. The investigation against the four men is over, the footage we want to see is of the four men, not the new detainees. I don't see how this changes anything. You still insist that I have misquoted Peter power, are you going to apologize for that? I doubt it very much. I also doubt that these new guys arrested will be convicted of anything, but like I said, "time will tell".

Craig W · Validated Poster Joined: 22 Feb 2007 Posts: 485

numeral · Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:28 am Post subject:

The BBC 10 o'clock News ran the CCTV footage of Khan, Tanweer and Germaine Lindsay from 28 June 2005 again. This time they left the timestamp half visible at the top. This is an improvement from 11 May 2006, the day the official narrative came out, when they left out the timestamp completely.

Mark Gobell · On Gardening Leave Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529

Does anyone know when the inquest is scheduled for ?

I have read that several inquests on some victims have been opened and adjourned but is there going to be a single inquest ?

Any details on when in June Numeral please ?

numeral · Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:10 am Post subject:

Mark Gobell · On Gardening Leave Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529

I found one reference to a June inquest but I just rang the St Pancras Coroners Court and they confirmed that all of that is speculation.

Information about the inquest will be released via the Met Police and Camden Council.

When I asked if there was any indication of when this would be the answer was "soon".

Interesting and important point that any criminal proceedings will delay the inquest.

I also enquired about how the inquest was to be conducted and the response was that it was still being decided but it was likely that it would be similar to that which was used for the victims of the Asian Tsunami.

Also asked about whether the inquest's mandate will include as part of the cause of death the type of explosives used. The response was that this was already known. I said that it wasn't mentioned in the official narrative and the response was that a reference will be made.

numeral · Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 7:33 pm Post subject:

brian · Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 8:14 pm Post subject:

Craig Murray - Rachel North.

http://www.craigmurray.co.uk/archives/2007/03/london_77_the_s.html

See following comment from Bridgette Dunne

Mark Gobell · On Gardening Leave Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529

First of all, I introduced my interest re: the 7/7 inquest.

He then asked me who I was.

Joe Public.

I guess from then on he could say whatever he wanted to.

One minute the explosives are known in response to my question about will the coroner mention them.

Then when I said the narrative doesn't mention them.

He said the coroner would.

We know why they are like this don't we.

My job and the never ending rodent's wheel of fortune just has to keep turning. No training instills this really. It just is.

No doubt he's relaxing with his oh so loved children this evening.

Preparing them for the same.

karlos · Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 5:06 am Post subject:

Link

	9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> London Bombings of Thursday 7th July 2005	All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Page 7 of 7