This Forum's Been Took!!!

[Bongo]

The moderators on this forum are dis-info promoters and have hijacked these boards.

Wake up people.

My parting shot from this "NPT-Laser Beam-nonsense"....

Well what can I say... But... "9/11 Was an Inside Job"...

You Neo-con Sci-Fi Kooks are losing... and I will be there to see your demise (You know who you are!)

You Dis-Info agents can go kiss my ass with your Laser beams, cos you make me violently sick!!!!

Bongo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Pikey]

Theres definitely been a moderation regime change and from my own personal experience it appears to be moderator Tony Gosling who is scrutinising every blog I make and on many occasions making changes which appear to me to be intent on "flaming" and creating division.

IMO moderation needed sorting particularly the damage being caused by the shills/trolls, OCT supporters who play the man not the ball.

It would be interesting to know who has been banned to date. How about the recognised shills/trolls and OCt supporters being given such a label on their profile so that when they post here new people coming here for the first time can understand were they are coming from!

[telecasterisation]

I agree that given the community nature of the board, it would indeed be useful to know who has been banned and why.

In addition, I would also like to comment on the way the topic headings are laid out;

This is a 911 board and the additional recently added sections are ancillary to the main thrust of what this is all about. Why are the 911 topic headings not at the top of the listings? The entire thing has been diluted greatly and now 911 is just one a number of assorted headings.

You go to the topic listings and it is very difficult to justify that this is still 911 focused. I have no real problem with an extra section covering other stuff, but the topic headings have grown and unless 911 takes centre stage, then this really is just a Jeff Rense annexe.

[scubadiver]

I would have to agree. The headings have made it confusing and disjointed. After the front page, I wonder what newcomers would think of the forum sections.

[ian neal]

So many different issues in the one thread

Bongo, you know not what you are talking about. This site has been taken from who by who exactly? Any repetition of this abuse will result in a ban but it won't be because of your views but your abuse.

Clearly it is your belief that NPT is disinfo, but the forum has no opinion on this one way or the other and the beliefs of individual moderators should not influence the moderation.

The only moderator openly supportive of NPT/TVF is AJ. TG and JW are openly hostile to this line of inquiry and the rest (me, Mick M, JHR and SuperAdmin) have never expressed an opinion to the best of my knowledge so it's a bit hard to see what you are talking about.

I have yet to find the time to read all of Judy Wood's evidence and therefore feel in no position to comment on her theories regarding Exotic Weapons, etc. I suspect many of those that criticise her have also failed to read her papers. Besides whether I agreed with Judy Woods or disagreed with her, it wouldn't influence how the site is moderated. None of us (should) moderate based on our own beliefs or the beliefs of the person we are moderating but based purely on the moderation policy.

Tony G has editted some users posts in the past. I believe him when he says this was done in what he saw as the best interests of the site and in an attempt to make the thread titles clearer. However this has caused understandable concern from some users and the moderators are agreed that posts should only be editted with the prior consent of the user concerned.

Who has been banned? I would need to check to be absolutely sure I have everyone here but from memory the following users have been
in this order

Ignoring countless porn / spammers that attempt to post here

Ally (for being Ally)
Jref and another critic for accusing me of being antisemitic without producing any evidence
TTWSU3, Patrick Brown and Ironsnot for repeated abuse of other posters
Johnny Pixels and Ignatz for repeatedly posting outside CC.



There may have been one or two others who I am confident would have fallen into the vast majority users definition of trolls but I don't recall. Basically as few as possible, but repeated failure to follow the forum rules does lead to a ban

If any users is really curious why these users were banned I recommend reviewing their posts and then PM me for a fuller explanation.

The new section headings and restructuring of the forum

2 points. There has been ample opportunity to post on threads discussing the reworking of the forum in order to influence it. The meetings in Blackpool and Bristol were clear and unaminous (sp) in calling for the site to be redesigned so that the forum and its content and links is not associated or seen to be associated with the campaign.

Obviously the front page still needs editting to make this clear that this site does NOT represent the campaign or its views but I don't have the ability to do this and so I am reliant on others to edit this.

Beyond that I don't really care how it is structured. I suggest however we give the present set up a go and revisit the structure in a month or so although I'm happy to hear views on this.

If users feel this forum reflects badly at times on the 9/11 truth movement and British campaign then you will find no argument from me and that is why I have tried to push through recent changes such as introducing a clear moderation policy, new sections that distance the forum from the campaign and expanding the pool of moderators.

What I do object to is know nothings accusing the sites moderators of being disinfo agents (presumably deliberately planting disinfo and working for the other side) when you don't know us.