NIST Contractor ARA linked to Directed Energy Weapons

[Andrew Johnson]

Memo now sent by Judy Wood and Jerry Leaphart to point out the conflict of interest.

http://911scholars.org/Media/DEW/jvl_memorandum.pdf

NIST Lists ARA as a contractor:

http://wtc.nist.gov/solicitations/

Silver level Founding Sponsors of DEPS:

http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/sponsors.html

http://www.ara.com/

More discussion here:

http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?showtopic=109331

[MadgeB]

These NIST-Directed Energy Weapon links should be widely known inside the 9/11 Truth movement and not allowed to be swept under the carpet. I mean, the skeletons in NIST's closets are not controversial in themselves, are they? I don't see how it could be argued that exposing them could 'harm the movement'.

But there's a helluva lot to read through and piece together - it seems ripe for a presentation! Do you go in for that sort of thing Andrew, or do you know anyone who's good at it who might be willing to put something together?

[Andrew Johnson]

[MadgeB]

Thanks Andrew - I have seen those two presentations in Seattle - watched Judy Wood’s after someone (probably you!) posted it here earlier. Some would be happier if we all stuck to the Greg Jenkins on-the-spot ‘ambush’, but if anyone is interested to see something Judy Woods had time to prepare in advance, here’s the link again: http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=77942

I’ve now also watched your presentation on Black Technology and anti-gravity etc. I’m not at all scientifically-inclined and it’s not usually the sort of thing I’d watch, but I must say it was a good piece of work - good alternation of comment, audio and video clips, logically laid out, kept it interesting even for the sceptic IMO. It’s great to see people keeping their mind open about and exploring the possibilities unfettered scientific research can bring, even if they sometimes take a path that leads to a dead end. If only this science (and all science) wasn’t in the hands of a minority who have to oppress and destroy, on pain of self-destruction. The bit I liked best was when Boyd Bushman spoke about “walking the lonely walk” - poetic, huh?

Anyway I hope Judy, having made the most significant breakthrough in 9/11 research for at least the last couple of years, will be including in her next presentation some details on her findings about the links between NIST and directed energy weapons research - if not, you know what you have to do, kiddo…

[rodin]

More DEW discussion

http://www.nolajbs.net/forum/index.php?topic=7785.0

As you know I have a hunch microwaves or infrared radiation was part of the mix that took out WTC. Complex crop circles are I am sure the work of microwave lasers directed by moveable mirrors. However it is a big leap to suggest that the sort of DEW weapons discussed in the above thread would have the raw power to melt steel and vapourise concrete on WTC scale.

[MadgeB]

Thanks for that roundup Rodin, a fascinating collection of articles. It does seem likely that several methods of destruction were used on the WTC, including 'conventional' explosions, but I also think the perps are likely to have access to more advanced and powerful weaponry than the military or air force want to admit to in the public arena.

Loved this quote about the 'confusion' laser weapons create:
"Additionally, lasers employed as a strike weapon also have the advantage of being largely undetectable. Their use, therefore, would not only cause damage, but chaos and confusion within enemy forces and commanders. "There's no huge explosion associated with its employment," a Lockheed Martin official told Aviation Week & Space Technology. "There are no pieces and parts left behind that someone can analyze to say, 'This came from the U.S.' The damage is very localized, and it's hard to tell where it came from and when it happened. It's all pretty mysterious."