View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Andrew Johnson Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1919 Location: Derbyshire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
brian Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 611 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In what way did Greening debunk Jones? Do you have a link?
Who is Greening posting as at the forum? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The most outstanding aspect of that interview is that Greening refuses to be bullied or misdirected by Fetzer.
I'm relieved that he batted 'beam weaponry' out of the park as science fiction and gave short shrift, albeit in a polite British way, to Judy Woods' ideas. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brian Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 611 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see Greening is posting as Apollo20
Greening is be behaving in the manner that "Martin Schotz, a psychiatrist who’s studied the JFK assassination, points out is the real objective of disinformation, which is not to persuade us of the “official account” but to create so much uncertainty that “everything is believable and nothing is knowable.”
He is a disinformationist - full stop. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1919 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
brian wrote: | In what way did Greening debunk Jones? Do you have a link?
Who is Greening posting as at the forum? |
http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf
My favourite bit of the interview above was Greening's reference to Crop Circles. That was great. _________________ Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MadgeB Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Nov 2006 Posts: 164
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 12:04 am Post subject: Greening on Fetzer show |
|
|
I had to give up half way through Greening on Fetzer's programme, it was just SO boring. The bloke didn't have an idea in his head and just pushed the OCT/'leave it to the experts' meme. Maybe try swallowing another dose of that cr*ap later.
What a contrast to Jerry Leaphart who not only provided loads of new information but also gently reined in Fetzer's ramblings and kept things moving - give that man his own programme! Interesting too that Leaphart specialised in Space Law in (I think he said) the 1970s and knew about development of laser weapons then. 'Beam weapons=science fiction' my arse. Tell it to ARA. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
brian Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2005 Posts: 611 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andrew, I am surprised you consider that Greening piece as worthy of being classed as debunking. Its nothing more than what Greening is now doing in the randi forum, offering highly implausible scenarios to obfuscate the issue.
Jones responded to that piece -
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ExptAlMelt.doc
I find your attempts to undermine Jones puzzling and employing a fraud such as Greening to do so even more puzzling. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1919 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2007 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
brian wrote: | Andrew, I am surprised you consider that Greening piece as worthy of being classed as debunking. Its nothing more than what Greening is now doing in the randi forum, offering highly implausible scenarios to obfuscate the issue.
Jones responded to that piece -
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/ExptAlMelt.doc
|
I didn't think he "debunked" Jones - I was one of the people who actually found the Greening paper and brought it to Steve Jones' attention about 1 year ago and then Jones responded.
Quote: | I find your attempts to undermine Jones puzzling and employing a fraud such as Greening to do so even more puzzling. |
Well, undermine is not the word I would choose. If you want to understand better my attiutde to Jones, read this:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/TheNew9-11Hijackers.htm
Click the links to access the evidence concerned. I helped S Jones originally. The evidence is all there for you.
Greening (and I am not sure whether he is a fraud, or if he is jsut suffering from Cognitive Dissonanace re 9/11) has a typical attitude to it all and I give him less credit than Jones and less credit than many other 9/11 Critics - especially following a mention of Crop Circles, which bear little or no relation to the topic being discussed. (Though the study of Crop Circles is also of great importance). _________________ Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|