Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:15 pm Post subject: The Nationalist Thatcherite you mean???
I'm not trying to start a flame war or troll, I'm just not a Whale fan.
Whale - I think he's a Nationalist Thatcherite with occasional racist tendencies/sympathies.
If the middle of the road white population in this country need Whale to say 9/11 was an inside job before they accept it as being an inside job then that's a different story.
I just don't like the guy, I remember a program recently where he bashed Muslim women for choosing to wear a face cover or head scarf and then some NHS hospitals for supplying them with surgical gowns with face covers.
Not mentioning a persons rights, or that they are actually they effective at stopping communicable diseases (coughs and sneezes), can hide facial disfigurement (if you are in hospital for a face tumour for example). And they can hide the identity of women going in for sensitive procedures, like an abortion in a hospital where they might know someone who works there..... (Muslim or non-Muslim) etc...
David has known James Whale for a number of years, and was on discussing 911 with Alex Jones last year. Very much a clash of the titans, volume-wise! _________________ All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing - Edmund Burke.
Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem Americanam appellant - Tacitus Redactus.
I have no time for this dis-info!!! In addition to this I also understand a man's right to say what he feels... 'freedom of speech if you like'? but I will vehemently contradict a man's (or woman's) opinion if I feel that it detracts seriously from the basic premise of which we fight!
In my opinion David needs to start supporting the people who know the OCT is a lie and drop all the disinfo.
As Dylan says in his above interview, "Are you going to take this NPT story to congress and hope to get a possitive response?"....
I absolutely agree with you - our time would be much better spent getting people to look at the basic issues around 911.
It is not necessarily our job, nor do we have the capability at this stage, to prove much of what what actually did happen that day. But we can easily show people what didn't and couldn't have happened - ie the OCT!
That's where I feel we should be focusing as a campaign. With the war in Iran looming, we need to wake as many people up as possible to what's really going on, and do so as quickly as we can. Only once this has happened will we be in a position to demand answers.
Regards
Annie _________________ All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing - Edmund Burke.
Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem Americanam appellant - Tacitus Redactus.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:02 pm Post subject: Re: The Nationalist Thatcherite you mean???
Sherlock Holmes wrote:
I'm not trying to start a flame war or troll, I'm just not a Whale fan.
Whale - I think he's a Nationalist Thatcherite with occasional racist tendencies/sympathies.
If the middle of the road white population in this country need Whale to say 9/11 was an inside job before they accept it as being an inside job then that's a different story.
I just don't like the guy, I remember a program recently where he bashed Muslim women for choosing to wear a face cover or head scarf and then some NHS hospitals for supplying them with surgical gowns with face covers.
Not mentioning a persons rights, or that they are actually they effective at stopping communicable diseases (coughs and sneezes), can hide facial disfigurement (if you are in hospital for a face tumour for example). And they can hide the identity of women going in for sensitive procedures, like an abortion in a hospital where they might know someone who works there..... (Muslim or non-Muslim) etc...
btw I'm not Tory, Labour, or BNP.
I used to like Whale but have gone off him over the last few years myself,
but isn't it about getting as much media exposer as possable for
9-11 Truth?
I have no time for this dis-info!!! In addition to this I also understand a man's right to say what he feels... 'freedom of speech if you like'? but I will vehemently contradict a man's (or woman's) opinion if I feel that it detracts seriously from the basic premise of which we fight!
In my opinion David needs to start supporting the people who know the OCT is a lie and drop all the disinfo.
As Dylan says in his above interview, "Are you going to take this NPT
story to congress and hope to get a possitive response?"....
Well... I dont think so!
Regards,
Brian.
Bongo, David & Annie are both very good at aticulating them self's when it comes to Talking in the media about 9/11 Truth, David Shayler is a very Powerfull speaker IMO beacuse he adds the spiritual with logic/intellect. Plus I don't think Congress would ever take 9/11 Truth seriously unless we break into the main stream, and by then they have too. But it will be all to late for these politcian's by then.
David Shayler is the only decent speaker the British 9/11 movement has got. He's articulate, speaks proper English that can be understood by everyone unlike some of the awkward mumblers I have heard with their strange dialects.
Shayler should be given all the support the British 9/11 movement can muster.
I also happen to think his no planes theory makes sense though I believe it is best to avoid that topic for now. The film showed a plane melting into the side of a building like a hot knife through butter and then coming out the other side as if there were no masses of steel girders and a concrete central lift core. Impossible!
Forget that for now. Keep plugging the rest of the evidence for truth.
David Shayler is the only decent speaker the British 9/11 movement has got. He's articulate, speaks proper English that can be understood by everyone unlike some of the awkward mumblers I have heard with their strange dialects.
Shayler should be given all the support the British 9/11 movement can muster.
I also happen to think his no planes theory makes sense though I believe it is best to avoid that topic for now. The film showed a plane melting into the side of a building like a hot knife through butter and then coming out the other side as if there were no masses of steel girders and a concrete central lift core. Impossible!
Forget that for now. Keep plugging the rest of the evidence for truth.
there were planes, but there also were hollywood pyrotechnics as well.
The fact is a plane cannoy go through a huge steel building and come out the other side. But it can dissappear into a wall of glass. _________________
Yes, I wonder how they created that massive plume of black smoke that lingered all morning over Manhattan? An ordinary fire in a building would not create smoke like that, would it? Pyrotechnics were used and possibly technology that none of us knows about yet.
If a plane had crashed into the side of that tower, most of the plane would have fallen in pieces down to the street. There is no way an aluminium plane would have gone right through all those girders and come out the other side! No way!
Next time you go to the airport, have a close look at those aircraft. Tap on the fuselage. Flimsy stuff.
there were planes, but there also were hollywood pyrotechnics as well.
The fact is a plane cannoy go through a huge steel building and come out the other side. But it can dissappear into a wall of glass.
i am not a mind control victim
I used to be but the cloud was lifted.
Now i believe everything Blair does or the BBC says is a 100% lie.
The fact is NPT is a mega missing the point
the whole of history is a lie
Moon Landings
Kennedy
Diana assasination
Hitler
Communism
Evolution
Flouride
vaccines
medicine
food
we are lied to every day
the fact remains planes did not cause the towers to collapse we agree on that?
the fact remains afghans/iraqis did not organise 911 yet they are the ones who have been massacred since
so while we are arguing about NPT bad things are happening
Trident for example
Microchips
ID cards dna database
fascist Britain/europe/usa _________________
Again we have the NPT crew, providing great scientific analysis and evidence...
Quote:
If a plane had crashed into the side of that tower, most of the plane would have fallen in pieces down to the street. There is no way an aluminium plane would have gone right through all those girders and come out the other side! No way!
Next time you go to the airport, have a close look at those aircraft. Tap on the fuselage. Flimsy stuff.
That Lockerbie photo proves nothing. The cockpit was found intact about a mile away in a field. This trench was caused by an engine on the wing section. Of course a heavy engine would scour the ground like that.
When the plane hit the Twin tower the cockpit would have disintegrated. It wouldn't have penetrated. The engines might but wasn't an engine found in the street? Wrong size, of course!
When the WW2 bomber hit the Empire State building it broke up and most of it fell down the side. Ok, so it wouldn't have been going so fast but there was very little penetration and certainly no orgasmic explosion as on 9/11. About 11 people died, I think.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
