No Planes Poll

David WJ Sherlock · Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 6:19 pm Post subject: No Planes Poll

I myself do not hold with the No Planes Theory

Bongo · 9/11 Truth critic Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 687

NWO, If I had known you were going to do this poll, I may never have told you how to post a poll on the forum. Wink

Only kidding dude. Anyway, it has been done about 5 times before...

And the answer... Well... Everytime, the NPT loses the argument.

I mean come on people, any fool can see that bog standard controlled demolition charges were responsible for the collapse of WTC7!

The fact is.... that the outcome we saw did not require any 'high tech', 'super duper', 'fantastical' events to happen....

... All it needed was a few professionally and well placed charges!

Phew!!!! Rolling Eyes

I take it I got that off my chest then??? Wink

Newspeak International · Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:12 pm Post subject:

On the oter hand all one needs is a few well placed "eye-witnesses"
and some dodgy footage,collusion of the media and hey presto Wink

Fallious · Moderate Poster Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 762

flamesong · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:18 am Post subject:

Fallious, that's FAF

thought criminal · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:28 am Post subject:

Busker · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:29 am Post subject:

I think the only stand I can take on NPT is I cannot rule it out.

Just look at the amazing effects you can create with domestic video editing. Add some industrial strength software into the equation and you just cannot categorically say the images that were played, over and over againg, could not have been artificially created.

I am sure in time, the truth will come out, but until then, large parts of the public are unable to accept what they saw on their screens was not a true and accurate record of events.

There are easier routes in to get people quesitoning the events of that day.

thought criminal · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:38 am Post subject:

Ray Ubinger · Minor Poster Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Posts: 90

Fallious · Moderate Poster Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 762

andyb · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:58 am Post subject:

funny as f*!£?

and TC I for one have looked into the no plane claims countless times but have yet to see anything apporaching a convincing argument. Telling me I mind controlled or a shill won't help your argument.

Fallious · Moderate Poster Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 762

flamesong · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 11:29 am Post subject:

Poacher · Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:23 pm Post subject:

My take on NPT is the same as the vast majority - total bollocs

It really annoys me people are sucked into this. Obviously some are disinfo agents, that is quite logical to do to try to discredit the Truth movement. But there are others that really are like a dog with a bone and will persist with the theory in the overwelming face of logic.

If you ARE really into 9/11 Truth then, at least for me, then you cannot take NPT seriously.

Nuff said.

xmasdale · Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:19 am Post subject:

I voted "no" because I think there are too many witnesses who claim they saw planes. Could they all have been put up to it by the powers that be? That stretches my credibility.

If on the other hand "no planes" means "no big Boeings" that is another issue. There are witnesses who say what they saw hitting the twin towers did not look like a normal passenger jet.

Also, if we think the Pentagon was struck by a Global Hawk or similar, that is a plane, even if a drone plane, and whether or not it fired a missile.

I also think it is poor tactics to broadcast no planes theory because it seems really difficult to prove and because such claims are a gift to detractors of the 911 truth movement, giving plenty of ammunition to those who seek to portray us as crazy.

It is also poor tactics to quarrel over this issue amongst ourselves. I accept that some people sincerely think there were no planes. Either way, we all agree we have been lied to about the facts and that a thorough criminal investigation is needed.

Busker · Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:24 pm Post subject:

thought criminal · Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:19 pm Post subject:

londonsound · Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:09 pm Post subject:

I have no time for No planes theory because in addition to the fact that the theory has no evidence to back it up flies in the face of any logic (amply demonstrated by cheney's notes above) but also because one of my friends twin sons saw and heard the first plane before it hit the tower and alerted his brother and mother to the fact.

he's probably not in on a conspiracy as he was three years old at the time!

M

karlos · Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:49 am Post subject:

The NPT is in fact a non theory.
People seem to ignore. It is cheaper and easier to use a second hand plane than to use CGI.
When they make an episode of a tv show and blow up a car they do not fake it do they? They use a real car off the scrapheap.
In Nevada and Texas there are huge car parks in the desert full of obselete planes such as the ones used on 911.

Look at the facts.
An old building riddled with asbestos.
And old planes.

karlos · Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 5:56 am Post subject:

please please please all of you
forget the no planes theory
it is a smokescreen

concentrate on whodunnit and why
concentrate on exposing the criminals and bringing them to account
dont get bogged down in the minutia

IronSnot · Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:21 pm Post subject:

So the score is 25-4 (and 4 liars).

Seems the NPT is failing to grab recruits.

thought criminal · Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 4:45 pm Post subject:

	9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies	All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1