| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Witchfinder General
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Apr 2007
Posts: 134
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: Can anybody explain the delayed fireball? |
 |
|
First the plane melts into the building, continously healing any damage it may do.
Second the plane has entered the building intact with no bits dropping off.
Third the building has completely healed.
Boom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! An explosion starting from the exit wound.
Can anybody explain this with comparable evidence?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVGrxxnL4dA |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No problem
There is no delayed fireball
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:03 pm Post subject: Re: Can anybody explain the delayed fireball? |
|
|
| Witchfinder General wrote: | First the plane melts into the building, continously healing any damage it may do.
Second the plane has entered the building intact with no bits dropping off.
Third the building has completely healed.
Boom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! An explosion starting from the exit wound.
Can anybody explain this with comparable evidence?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVGrxxnL4dA |
WG - you need to get one thing straight in your mind.
Watching video - especially off Youtube/Google whatever is not what actually happened.
It's an electronic representation of what happened.
You'll need to research further than internet videos to find answers to your questions.
But first some corrections.
Bits do fall off at impact.
Buildings don't heal - look at NIST's and other photos in a decent resolution to see what damage was actually caused.
As for the so-called delayed fireball, that comes at the end of a sequence of discrete events.
The fuel tanks in the wing rupture.
The fuel exits the wing at impact speed and begins to disperse inside the building.
Most of the fuel has left the building, before the richness of the fuel/air mixture inside reduces and is able to support combustion and we then see the exterior fireballs.
I'm not sure what you would call 'comparable evidence', but none of the above are either unreasonable assumptions or rocket science.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thought criminal
Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 574
Location: London
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:21 pm Post subject: Re: Can anybody explain the delayed fireball? |
|
|
| chek wrote: |
Buildings don't heal - look at NIST's and other photos in a decent resolution to see what damage was actually caused.
|
Gotcha! So you are willing to accept that photographic evidence courtesy of NIST are genuine despite them lying about EVERYTHING ELSE?
Is that what you are saying, Chek?
_________________
| chek wrote: |
look at NIST's and other photos in a decent resolution to see what damage was actually caused. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stefan
Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TC,
According to your ilk ALL videos (even those from ameteur bystanders) are tampered with and "lies".
So why should chek prefer the higher resolution images to super-compressed internet films?
_________________
Peace and Truth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 7:22 pm Post subject: Re: Can anybody explain the delayed fireball? |
|
|
| thought criminal wrote: | | chek wrote: |
Buildings don't heal - look at NIST's and other photos in a decent resolution to see what damage was actually caused.
|
Gotcha! So you are willing to accept that photographic evidence courtesy of NIST are genuine despite them lying about EVERYTHING ELSE?
Is that what you are saying, Chek? |
It's probably a waste of time, but consider this.
NIST employs scientists and technicians, who while maybe not the best in the world are competent enough for government work, as they say.
Contrary to your expectations and worldview, everyone working at NIST isn't contributing to the Illuminati Xmas Club for a New Year knees up and virgin sacrifice with cabaret till late.
I have no doubt that NIST is 'directed' when it comes to what they're permitted to 'find' in their reports, but their engineers, photographers and structural analysts are ordinary competent Joes doing a days work to the best of their ability. There are tons of good, usable data in there.
If you had more sense, you'd have already looked for yourself and determined that much already.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The fireball is hollywood pyrotechnics.
Nothing to do with the plane it is prepositioned pyrotenchnics.
Plane would have been low on fuel and things dont always explode so explosives were preset to go off when the plane struck
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | The fireball is hollywood pyrotechnics.
Nothing to do with the plane it is prepositioned pyrotenchnics.
Plane would have been low on fuel and things dont always explode so explosives were preset to go off when the plane struck |
I seem to recall off the top of my head that the amount of fuel being carried at impact was 10,000 gallons, and an estimation by their volume was that the exterior fireballs consumed between a third to half of that give or take.
On the other hand, I'm not averse to thinking the effects might have been enhanced, by additional fuel and/or by those mysterious disconnected computer battery systems.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
remember the FAKE Iranian bombs they showed on tv a few months ago.
They were exposed and fake and have never been mentioned since.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: |
Plane would have been low on fuel and things dont always explode so explosives were preset to go off when the plane struck |
This is indeed a straightforward possibility that I hadn't fully considered. However, I don't really think this accounts for things. Does anyone have any information as to how far that flight is supposed to have gone (I know I can check this myself!!)
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes
There is no delayed fireball
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flamesong
Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Posts: 1305
Location: okulo news
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd have thought this first map, of the 9/11 flightpaths would have been ingrained in every 9/11 researchers mind:
As can be seen from the map of America below, Los Angeles, the destination of both aircraft to hit the World Trade Center, is some distance away - about a couple of thousand miles - and both aircraft appear to have flown only about a tenth of that distance so they were both still carrying the vast majority of their fuel.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So here's a chance for 9/11 researchers to show they have at least some credible basis for their theories
For how long a duration is the fireball "delayed"?
What should have been the time between impact and fireball, and how has this been determined?
I've never had an answer to that yet from any "delayed fireball" advocate, so heres a chance to impress
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
