top down collapse

[marky 54]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHbC9gc_Ylo

i simply dont understand why it didnt keep going all they way down and level the whole building.

[Bongo]

Yep...

the precedent (WTC1 and 2) for this type of collapse is that the rubble should have fallen vertically through the entirety of the floors below, turning a large proportion of concrete in the floors below to dust as it happened.

I simply cannot accept this video to have not been faked... I believe that it is very likely that the portion of the building we see remaining after the collapse, has indeed been photoshopped onto the footage at a later date.



Ps... someone get rid of this fool... [b]Jan-hendrik [/b

[Reflecter]

Then theres the OCT theory
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PSt2AOfejc&mode=related&search=

[bigyin]

The first vid is how i would have expected the wtc towers to have collapsed. The top portion above where the planes hit should have slid off the section below the damaged area and the remainder of the tower from the ground up to just below where the planes hit should have remained standing, virtually unaffected.