Analysis of "CNN Footage Faked.. Part III"

[andrewwatson]

What is the argument about?

Fred's video http://www.livevideo.com/video/bsregistration/B534B6F558E44FC7846E99E0 7E41E8DB/cnn-fake-footage-blasted-mor.aspx

is as clear an example of the Emperor's clothes as we are likely to get.

As far as I can see it, the argument is over. TV fakery is fact.

Could we please be allowed to post in the main part of the Forum?

[marky 54]

cool i might not understand or see what others are telling me i should see
but if its case closed and 100% proof i carnt wait to hear how cnn responed etc, and how far it gets us.

whens the court case???

that is what will happen isnt it? or will it just mean posting the same stuff over and over and getting nowhere, 100% proof should be presented to the right people should'nt it??

ignore the general public that post on here including myself, we are just thick or agents and dont have a clue, good luck convincing the rest of the general public and being taken seriously by who ever you need to present it to.

seriously if theres something in this then i hope it makes ground, even though im not seeing the basis myself. i just hope your all right about it and can prove it, or it could turn very bad indeed in terms of getting another chance to inform the public who will certainly switch of if it turns out this is all imaginary evidence.

[david carmichael]

[andrewwatson]

I fear I may have spoken too soon.

The CNN shot may have been taken from a tour boat just off shore. I noticed that the angles of the buildings and the trees did not match from the land view, specifically the square tower behind the Whithall building and the Black building , which is noticeably higher in the CNN shot.

I am really sorry as it is an excellent video.

[david carmichael]

[John White]

[chek]

[chek]

[andyb]

[marky 54]

the camera man could of been squatting, or standing on a bench or even sitting on the floor which would all effect the prespective, has on the river been explored like suggested above or even standing on the opposite side of the river?

out of intrest have all these things been explored and eliminated as possibilites, and would it be admitted honestly if something does turn out to match the cnn news footage rather than denied through not wanting to be embarrased or feeling stupid etc?

[david carmichael]

[John White]

You do realise that bsregistration is now pwned as a faker?

[david carmichael]

[John White]

I don't know how you are going to explain to the people of White Pine County and Weeks Island, Louisiana, that you've been taken in by a flim flam artist

[david carmichael]

[John White]

De Nile is a river in egypt mate

I quite understand

[david carmichael]

[John White]

But, of course david, you don't

Time to get honest with yourself: you'll be a better and far happier man for it

[david carmichael]

[david carmichael]

repeated post

[Stefan]

[david carmichael]

[Stefan]

David,
I very much doubt that CNN or the Government are going to spend extensive effort on disproving the idea that CNN created their shots of New York on computer from the ground up, unless they start to see 9/11 Truth as a serious threat and want to discredit us that is.

You're doing a great job on their behalf by the way.

In your mind, David, why is it that CNN did not just superimpose a plane onto an existing shot of the twin towers?

[John White]

[david carmichael]

[Fred]

Hi, I finally got approved here.

I've provided footage from dozens of different locations as well as extensive analysis showing exatctly why the CNN footage is fake. Since John White, Chek, Fallious, and the gang are now experts at analysing perspective, I kindly request that they post a map with an X on it indicating the camera location for the CNN footage. We'll then go to that location and test their work and see if they're capable of solving perspective problems or not.

Here's video from the tour boat which clearly shows that 19 Rector Street should be visible above the treeline if the footage were shot from a tour boat close to shore. I've posted a new thread here with a demand that John White back up his false accusations against me with evidence that I faked some photographs, along with a link to the source of his claim that I represented a still photograph as live video.

Here is the source for the photos taken on September 11 that John White claims I faked.

http://www.bigfoto.com/sites/galery/sept11

I've also made a new video showing the view from the tour boat close to shore along with a different genre of music which I hope will be pleasing to John White's sensitve ears. I've also tried to communicate at his level, so I hope that everyone understands that I'm simply trying to accomodate people like Stefan, John, and Chek by experimenting with a new style. Enjoy!

http://www.livevideo.com/video/bsregistration/8C1F9CC2735F49EC91A8D5BB 953612D9/disinfo-in-the-uk-150-replies.aspx

Fred

ps Fallious, "Good work!" lol

[John White]

[Stefan]

Anyone else notice that in all these pages of BIG font COLOURED font and various hysterical rambling, none of "Team Fred" have called a spade a spade and simply stated what it is they are claiming?

Let's try again:

Fred, David, Madge, Banish et all:

You believe that rather than super impose a plane onto an existing shot of the New York attacks, CNN created the whole of New York on computer, forgetting to include a building or two.
Right?

That's all I'm looking from you in your response; a yes or no.

[Stefan]

Sounds silly when you say it out loud doesn't it?

[Stefan]

I know you're online Fred.