| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: Prof Wood Submits 2nd Supplement to NIST RFC |
 |
|
Based on some Witness Testimony and includes a list of NIST contractors with "vested interests"....
http://911scholars.org/Media/DEW/Wood_supplement2_to_RFC1.pdf
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does it list what their vested interests are?
BTW might have been a technical fault with my reader, but there seemed to be a stack of blank pages in that pdf?
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2007 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No. There is text on every page of Wood's supplement # 2 to her Request for Correction. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MadgeB
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 164
|
| Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 6:08 pm Post subject: RFC |
|
|
...and it deals with phenomena unexplained and unexplainable by the Official Story of plane crashes/fire/gravity-driven collapse - parked cars exploding and burning, explosions in WTC6 and suchlike.
But does NIST still have to reply to this within the original 60 days? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | On the morning of September 11th I was
on house watch, and it was about 8:00. A little
bit after 8, because I was watching the news, I
saw the first airplane or it would seem, an
explosion on one of the towers |
I thought the first impact wasnt recorded on any news broadcast? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kc wrote: | | Quote: | On the morning of September 11th I was
on house watch, and it was about 8:00. A little
bit after 8, because I was watching the news, I
saw the first airplane or it would seem, an
explosion on one of the towers |
I thought the first impact wasnt recorded on any news broadcast? |
it was'nt the only one that was came from the naudet brothers who would of still been filming at that time, it wasnt untill the next day or late that day it was shown as far as im aware. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
david carmichael
Moderate Poster
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 1:00 pm Post subject: Re: Prof Wood Submits 2nd Supplement to NIST RFC |
|
|
Hey! Andrew "ask the tough questions" Johnson...
...why don't you have Moderator, Ian Neal, Micpsi and Moderator, John White do a little right angle trig...
..on how much of the 19 Rector St Bldg would be occluded from view by the TREETOPS of Whitehall Bldg Tree Set IF THE CNN Video Footage was shot above the TREETOP LEVEL of the esplanade "water's edge" TREE SET at Battery Park.
No sense 911UKers DEBUNKING OTHERS when they've shown in 30+ postings THAT THEY can't even debunk themselves.
Splendid mathematical posting at PhysOrg, Andrew Johnson...
This is EVEN SIMPLER right-angle trig.
Physician...Heal Thyself...and thy own moderators ..and thy own REGULAR 911UK posters ....
..before you cast your eyes ON other 911truthers OR EVEN the UK and US Government agencies |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 2:51 pm Post subject: Re: Prof Wood Submits 2nd Supplement to NIST RFC |
|
|
| david carmichael wrote: |
Hey! Andrew "ask the tough questions" Johnson...
...why don't you have Moderator, Ian Neal, Micpsi and Moderator, John White do a little right angle trig...
..on how much of the 19 Rector St Bldg would be occluded from view by the TREETOPS of Whitehall Bldg Tree Set IF THE CNN Video Footage was shot above the TREETOP LEVEL of the esplanade "water's edge" TREE SET at Battery Park.
No sense 911UKers DEBUNKING OTHERS when they've shown in 30+ postings THAT THEY can't even debunk themselves.
Splendid mathematical posting at PhysOrg, Andrew Johnson...
This is EVEN SIMPLER right-angle trig.
Physician...Heal Thyself...and thy own moderators ..and thy own REGULAR 911UK posters ....
..before you cast your eyes ON other 911truthers OR EVEN the UK and US Government agencies |
David, your quest to prove your own half-wittedness seems to know no bounds.
Right angle trig would obviously only be possible with a right angle involved, i.e. the target building and the camera point would both have to be at ground level.
It has already been demonstrated that is not the case - however, you and your collaborating main act created the mess of threads that your answer is buried in, so you can go look for the coup de grace yourself.
Just in case you're in any doubt, your CNN TV fakery hypothesis has passed on.
It is no more.
It has ceased to be.
It's expired and gone to meet its maker.
It's a stiff.
Bereft of life, it rests in peace.
It's pushing up the daisies.
Its metabolic processes are now history.
It's off the twig.
It's kicked the bucket, shuffled off its mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisibule.
THIS IS AN EX-THEORY.
I hope that's clear enough.
Now - why not go help Fred spot 'scary faces' and other Rorschach artefacts in the WTC smoke, there's a good chap.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MadgeB
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Nov 2006
Posts: 164
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:01 pm Post subject: Witness testimony |
|
|
Re: “I saw the first airplane or it would seem”… Many people wrongly believed, and still insist to this day, that they watched the first ‘plane crash’ live. And likewise for the second hit. The reason for the confusion (which was deliberately fostered) is explained by Gerard Holmgren here:
http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/holmgren/index.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
david carmichael
Moderate Poster
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 159
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:11 pm Post subject: Re: Witness testimony |
|
|
| MadgeB wrote: | Re: “I saw the first airplane or it would seem”… Many people wrongly believed, and still insist to this day, that they watched the first ‘plane crash’ live. And likewise for the second hit. The reason for the confusion (which was deliberately fostered) is explained by Gerard Holmgren here:
http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/holmgren/index.htm |
What was the cause of those cars exploding AS EXPLAINED by the first paramedic BEFORE THE cars had been towed? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
