Inquiry demanded into 7/7 attacks

[scubadiver]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6195914.stm

[Skeptic]

BBC:

"Opposition parties say the case for a public inquiry into the London bombings is "overwhelming" after new revelations about the intelligence on the bombers.
Tory David Davis said ministers had not told the "whole truth". The Lib Dems said briefings suggesting the bombers were "clean skins" had not proved true."

http://www.underthecarpet.co.uk/Pages/NewsArticle.php?num=2115

[rodin]

Since 7/7 was an inside job this must also be a frame up surely?

Fertiliser indeed!

[Mark Gobell]

The Operation Crevice arrests were made on 30.3.2004 exactly 91 months and 1 week after UBL issued his original Declaration Of War Aagainst The Americans Occupying The Land Of The Holy Places known as the Ladenese Epistle on 23.8.1996

[Bongo]

As usual... expect a whitewash!

[conspiracy analyst]

in London many with an American theme.

It appears the theatre of the 'war on terror' continues unabated with so many twists in the story and so many reconstructed tales with leads leading everywhere that the authors may be proud.

There was no connection between the security services and the London bombers, now there was, tomorrow there might not be again.

Who cares about the story. Forget the detail, the message is important even if it is built on a mountain of lies.

[Mark Gobell]

Similar thread Operation Crevice

[Mark Gobell]

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed blogs about his involvement with this from the Guardian.

'Inquiry needed to minimise future deaths'

Following is the full text of the letter asking the home secretary, John Reid, for an independent inquiry into the July 7 2005 bombings. It is written by Oury Clark Solicitors.

Tuesday May 1, 2007
Guardian Unlimited


We act on behalf of Rachel North, Paul Mitchell, Janine Mitchell, Jacqui Putnam, Ros Morley, Tim Coulson, Elizabeth Kenworthy, Susan Maxwell, David Gould, Graham Foulkes, Nader Mozakka, Brian Morley, Lesley Ratcliff, Angela Ioannou, Robert Webb, Saba Mozakka, Sandra Brewster, Joe Kerr and others who were materially affected by events that took place in London on 7th July 2005.

Background:

As you are more than aware, during the morning rush hour of 7th July 2005, a series of coordinated terrorist bomb blasts hit the London public transport system.

Three bombs exploded on London Underground trains, respectively on an eastbound Circle line train, on a westbound Circle line train and on a westbound Piccadilly line train. A fourth bomb exploded on a double-decker bus approximately one hour later at Tavistock Square.

Fifty-six people, including the four perpetrators, were killed in the attacks and about 700 were injured.

Nature and purpose of inquiry sought:

Our clients seek an independent and impartial public inquiry into events that took place on 7th July 2005 with a view to the production of a publicly available report containing appropriate recommendations.

One of the key purposes of the inquiry would be to examine issues aimed at saving lives, minimising suffering and improving the response of government agencies to the continuing threat of terrorist attacks in the UK and abroad and in the event of any similar attack in the future.

Issues to be examined by the independent public inquiry:

Whilst this is not an exhaustive list of issues, our clients seek the production of a comprehensive, accurate and definitive factual account of how the bombings occurred culminating in the attacks themselves, the police investigation and the emergency response to the bombings.

Our clients are prepared to accept that the inquiry should not prejudice any ongoing investigation, but will expect you to account for what investigations are ongoing and how they may be prejudiced.

The inquiry should also focus upon communication as between the government, the police, the bereaved and survivors, government agencies charged with preventing terrorism investigating attacks and responding to the needs of the bereaved, the injured and any other survivors, and as between the emergency services internally within each service and with each other in the aftermath of an attack.

Additionally, our clients consider that the independent public inquiry should address the issue of safety on public transport, coordinated care for the bereaved, injured and other survivors as well as a focus upon the adequacies of existing compensatory mechanisms to include the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme.

Powers of the inquiry:

Our clients request an effective inquiry, being one which has the appropriate powers to require witness and documentary evidence and to invite relevant contributions from all stakeholders indirectly and directly affected by the incidences.

We note that to date no such independent and impartial public inquiry has been established and it is believed by our clients that such an inquiry is necessary to demonstrate effective due diligence in seeking to minimise death and suffering in the event of future attacks as well as demonstrating a step which will assist public confidence with the perception of being seen to take all appropriate steps as a responsible government to ensure independence in the process of protecting life.

We would welcome the opportunity to discuss the content of this letter in company of our clients but in the first instance invite your written response to our clients' formal request that you order an inquiry into the London bombings on 7th July 2005 as set out in this letter.

Yours faithfully Oury Clark Solicitors

[karlos]