| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
 Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: Secret Airbase for Drone Aircraft |
 |
|
| Where would 4 remote control Boeing 767's be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport. Are there special unmanned airbases where remote control planes could be launched without the local ground crew knowing about it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fred, there are THOUSANDS of airbases in America that arent listed on any map, Groom Lake isnt the only blank space on Ordanance Survey over there.
Why would they need to be unmanned? Surely a a ground crew for 4 remote control planes would be far far smaller than most of the groups of people in on the conspiracy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Right. I'd like to know which airbase the drones took off from and how they escaped radar. Did they fly at treetop level? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Right. I'd like to know which airbase the drones took off from |
Good for you! I'd like to know why the monster in Evolution of The Daleks looked like Joey Tribianni with a turkey on his head. Lets work together on this one shall we?
Who said they escaped radar? The same government officials accused of lying about the whole 11/9 attack? Oh well they MUST be telling the truth then! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why won't you answer a simple question. Your post is off topic. If you have nothing of value to say, please leave. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you'll find YOUR second post was off topic. The topic was "where would remote control planes be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport"
I not only answered that there are numerous locations, but also pointed out that the ground crews would proabably be in on the whole thing and therefore not need the take off hiding from them.
You then changed the topic to a seperate question, thereby going off topic, thereby inviting some petard hoisting which I duly delivered cause I'm nice and generous like that :)
Ergo your question is answered, I therefore give you permission to leave my presence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This is my thread, you're posting here, please answer my question. Anything else is off-topic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schizophrenogenic element
Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 102
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kc wrote: | I think you'll find YOUR second post was off topic. The topic was "where would remote control planes be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport"
I not only answered that there are numerous locations, but also pointed out that the ground crews would proabably be in on the whole thing and therefore not need the take off hiding from them.
You then changed the topic to a seperate question, thereby going off topic, thereby inviting some petard hoisting which I duly delivered cause I'm nice and generous like that 
Ergo your question is answered, I therefore give you permission to leave my presence. |
What proof have you got that remote controlled planes hit the towers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | Fred, there are THOUSANDS of airbases in America that arent listed on any map, Groom Lake isnt the only blank space on Ordanance Survey over there.
Why would they need to be unmanned? Surely a a ground crew for 4 remote control planes would be far far smaller than most of the groups of people in on the conspiracy? |
That would be the same answer from the top of the page, I#m assuming you have difficulty with scroll wheels and missed it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | What proof have you got that remote controlled planes hit the towers? |
None at all, and thats not the topic of this thread so jog on now before Fred gets annoyed with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schizophrenogenic element
Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 102
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kc wrote: | | Quote: | | What proof have you got that remote controlled planes hit the towers? |
None at all, and thats not the topic of this thread so jog on now before Fred gets annoyed with you. |
And what proof have you that any plane hit the towers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | This is my thread, you're posting here, please answer my question. Anything else is off-topic. |
Joggeth onneth, theres a good pat |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schizophrenogenic element
Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 102
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kc wrote: | | Quote: | | This is my thread, you're posting here, please answer my question. Anything else is off-topic. |
Joggeth onneth, theres a good pat |
Answer my question, dipsy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| schizophrenogenic element wrote: | | kc wrote: | | Quote: | | What proof have you got that remote controlled planes hit the towers? |
None at all, and thats not the topic of this thread so jog on now before Fred gets annoyed with you. |
And what proof have you that any plane hit the towers? |
plane parts found at the site.
plane holes in the buildings.
we all know about these dont we?
like i said to fred im always open to other means, but these two bit of evidence dont half get in the way.
if they can be proved to be fake/planted then good and you need to prove it anyway if you expect a court or the media to take what is being claimed seriously. or as ive said before these two bits of evidence will end up being counter productive to your claims when the media/general public/courts provide the evidence of them.
you need answers, and i have no reason to think no planes untill evidence is presented that prove the plane holes fake or made by other means and plane parts were planted.
Last edited by marky 54 on Thu May 10, 2007 4:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Answer my question, dipsy! |
No can do chickadoo. Mr Fred has already said that answering any questions in his thread other than those specifically posed by Mr Fred in the opening subject will result in much jettisoning of toys from said persons perambulator.
Therefore please perambulate on in a jogging stylee. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schizophrenogenic element
Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 102
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kc wrote: | | Quote: | | Answer my question, dipsy! |
No can do chickadoo. Mr Fred has already said that answering any questions in his thread other than those specifically posed by Mr Fred in the opening subject will result in much jettisoning of toys from said persons perambulator.
Therefore please perambulate on in a jogging stylee. |
Is that all you can say, you mong?
"Therefore please perambulate on in a jogging stylee". Do you think this is amusing? You do, don't you??
Go on, gang up on Fred, everyone else is doing it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:03 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Airbase for Drone Aircraft |
|
|
| Fred wrote: | | Where would 4 remote control Boeing 767's be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport. |
Four 767's?
Someone needs to do some research. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schizophrenogenic element
Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 102
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:08 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Airbase for Drone Aircraft |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | Fred wrote: | | Where would 4 remote control Boeing 767's be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport. |
Four 767's?
Someone needs to do some research. |
I think you do too, considering you still think the official story is a real possibility. Telecasterisation, you do realise that being a sceptic is the easiest thing in the world to do? You have NEVER brought any of your own research to this board. All you do is bring your smug, clutching at straws nitpickery here and probably beleive you are being 'oh so clever' while you are doing it. The reality of it is you are not, the reality is that you are dull, patronising and lazy.
There is a forum called the James Randi Foundation, please google it, visit it and discover a whole new spiritual home for yourself.
They will adore you there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:13 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Airbase for Drone Aircraft |
|
|
| schizophrenogenic element wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | | Fred wrote: | | Where would 4 remote control Boeing 767's be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport. |
Four 767's?
Someone needs to do some research. |
I think you do too, considering you still think the official story is a real possibility. Telecasterisation, you do realise that being a sceptic is the easiest thing in the world to do? You have NEVER brought any of your own research to this board. All you do is bring your smug, clutching at straws nitpickery here and probably beleive you are being 'oh so clever' while you are doing it. The reality of it is you are not, the reality is that you are dull, patronising and lazy.
There is a forum called the James Randi Foundation, please google it, visit it and discover a whole new spiritual home for yourself.
They will adore you there. |
TC - good move avoiding Fred's faux pas. Knew you'd be back.
Incidentally, I am adored everywhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
schizophrenogenic element
Moderate Poster
Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 102
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:22 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Airbase for Drone Aircraft |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | schizophrenogenic element wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | | Fred wrote: | | Where would 4 remote control Boeing 767's be able to take off without attracting the attention of the people working at the airport. |
Four 767's?
Someone needs to do some research. |
I think you do too, considering you still think the official story is a real possibility. Telecasterisation, you do realise that being a sceptic is the easiest thing in the world to do? You have NEVER brought any of your own research to this board. All you do is bring your smug, clutching at straws nitpickery here and probably beleive you are being 'oh so clever' while you are doing it. The reality of it is you are not, the reality is that you are dull, patronising and lazy.
There is a forum called the James Randi Foundation, please google it, visit it and discover a whole new spiritual home for yourself.
They will adore you there. |
TC - good move avoiding Fred's faux pas. Knew you'd be back.
Incidentally, I am adored everywhere. |
You understand what I am saying? I have never heard you defend anything on this board. You are basically a critic of anything that disputes the official line. That is so easy. What do you get out of it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson
Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1919
Location: Derbyshire
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It woiuld be nice if ALL posters would refrain from insults such as "mong" "stupid" or doing things like bringing in the topic of human-dalek hybrids in support of their statements.
Simple question/answer/ rebuttal will do nicely...
_________________
Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:31 pm Post subject: Re: Secret Airbase for Drone Aircraft |
|
|
| schizophrenogenic element wrote: | | What do you get out of it? |
Toffee apples. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 11:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Go on, gang up on Fred, everyone else is doing it. |
Wasnt ganging up on him at all, I answered his question to the best of my ability then you wandered in on the charm wagon.
Tele - bang one of them toffee apples my way mate? Cheers :) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since kc has given an answer (whether people like it or not), can someone tell me where the 'airborne lasers' mentioned in the other thread took off from? I reckon I'd be a lot more surprised if I saw an 'airborne laser' taking off than just some plane.
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | | Since kc has given an answer (whether people like it or not), can someone tell me where the 'airborne lasers' mentioned in the other thread took off from? I reckon I'd be a lot more surprised if I saw an 'airborne laser' taking off than just some plane. |
That is a good point, I live under the Filton flightpath and see airborne lasers landing all the time, but never taking off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | Dogsmilk wrote: | | Since kc has given an answer (whether people like it or not), can someone tell me where the 'airborne lasers' mentioned in the other thread took off from? I reckon I'd be a lot more surprised if I saw an 'airborne laser' taking off than just some plane. |
That is a good point, I live under the Filton flightpath and see airborne lasers landing all the time, but never taking off. |
It's a design flaw. Apparently there's hundreds of 'em stacked up somewhere near the centre of the Earth. All for want of a simple 'laser off' switch, I heard.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
