Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
 Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:48 pm Post subject: 7/7 Inquiry |
 |
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | July 7 inquiry was rejected because of cost, papers reveal
Dominic Kennedy
The Home Office rejected an inquiry into the 7/7 bombings after officials warned that it might last years, cost millions and be unstoppable, newly released documents show.
Although the Prime Minister has publicly ruled out an inquiry on the ground that it would demoralise and undermine the security services, there is no mention of this danger in the papers released.
But the huge public expense of previous inquiries – ranging from £10 million looking into race killings to £155 million for Bloody Sunday – was highlighted by officials.
The Home Office declined to give the documents to The Times for 11 months, then came up with them just as Tony Blair’s resignation was dominating the news.
Survivors of the London bombings, backed by opposition politicians, have been vigorously demanding an independent inquiry into whether security blunders led to the 2005 massacre.
The clamour grew last week when it emerged that the ringleader Mohammad Sidique Khan’s name featured twice in MI5 antiterrorist operations more than a year before the bombings.
The Times asked the Home Office last June for information about whether a public inquiry should be held into the attacks by four suicide bombers which killed 52 commuters. In December, officials wrote back rejecting that request and arguing that as much information as possible had already been released.
They highlighted a report by the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) which, they claimed, “provides an independent assessment of the intelligence background”. That review cleared MI5 of blame for its failure to investigate Khan.
MPs and victims have protested that this committee lacks independence since it is appointed by, and reports to, the Prime Minister who is also responsible for the Security Service.
A document now released by the Home Office provides ammunition for the critics.
After considering a variety of types of public and private inquiry, looking at how powerful and independent each might be, officials turn to the body appointed by Downing Street. They note that the ISC is free from parliamentary control.
The document appears to have been censored as it finishes midway through a sentence followed by two-thirds of a page of white space.
The ISC chairman Paul Murphy, a former Labour minister, wrote to Tony Blair six days after the bombings saying the committee would examine the issues.
The Prime Minister has asked the ISC to look again at its findings in the wake of the fresh disclosures suggesting MI5 failed to monitor Khan.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1780080.ece
So in what exact sense would it be "unstoppable"? |
I presume that they meant unstoppable in the same way that the Bloody Sunday Inquiry is now unstoppable, having gone on for years at vast expense, and been completely left behind by subsequent events. When it eventually grinds to a halt and reports, the liklihood is that everyone involved will have long since died of old age, and whatever conclusions are reached, they are already irrelevant today.
But we can learn from this experience, and this need not be the case with a 7/7 Inquiry. A time limit of say six months could be set at the outset, to stop it going on interminably that would give the chairman the authority to limit time-wasting. The revelations after the recent trial should give added impetus to the calls for an inquiry, which should never have been refused. Perhaps Brown will take a different view when he succeeds Bliar, as Bliar took a different view over the Bloody Sunday Inquiry from Major. Brown will not have mistakes and omissions on his watch to deter him. |
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's an interesting analogy - on one hand, there shouldn't be much of a comparison - 26 protesters being shot by the army is inevitably going to throw up more controversy, willingness to obscure and prevaricate and general messing about than an 'open and shut case' about four 'clean skins' (I'm going on what was said at the time the possibility of an inquiry was dismissed) where HM Gov allegedly did no wrong, but where maybe intelligence could have been a bit better. Other inquiries manage to happen in sensible time limits.
But, I think your explanation is essentially correct. I just think they knew damn well it would lead to avenues they don't want anyone going down. This isn't necessarily about 'conspiracy theories' - we've already seen the 'bombers' weren't 'clean skins' - even if you don't think 'MI5DIDIT', I don't think that precludes the notion there are a few closets with boney fellas inside waiting to leap out. Given the inquiry would presumably not concern the actual events in all their strangers on a canceled train glory, one does wonder what on earth would lead anyone to suspect it would go on for very long at all.
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
