ae911truth.org is a 9/11 Cover Up Perp site

[CB_Brooklyn]

One must understand what's going on here; it's not that difficult to.

I made numerous posts in the ae911truth forum, the most recent ones including the following links:

911 Octopus 8: Media Perps Unmasked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ySSJ_L6Zs

CNN Cartoon - 19 Rector Street building should NOT be there:

http://www.911researchers.com/node/389

The Frozen Fireball


http://www.911researchers.com/node/483

Half in, half out. No break in building between engines and fuselage.



Technology Review Magazine Discusses the military and TV Networks ability to use TV-Fakery to alter world politics:

http://www.911researchers.com/node/174

These Videos of REAL Plane Crashes Explain 9/11 TV-Fakery Very Clearly
http://www.911researchers.com/node/98


I also posted links to Dr Judy Wood's new work:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt1.html


Less than 24 hours later, Gage disabled the forums. This did not come as a surprise actually, since Gage is promoting Steven Jones and is therefore a 9/11 Coverup Perp distracting people from the REAL provable inside job evidence of Exotic Weaponry and TV-Fakery at the WTC.

Steven Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.

Another Cover Up Perp, Greg Jenkins, did an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. It has recently been discovered that Jenkins' has ties to the NSA. Only after a close analysis of this interview:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Jenkins_transcript.html did Dr Wood realize what Jenkins wanted kept secret.

Judy's new paper is based on the data that Jones/Jenkins want kept hidden:

Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt1.html


Jones and his group have been doing everything possible to discourage people from looking at Judy Wood's directed energy weapon work and the obvious TV-Fakery evidence. (Yes, obvious, as demonstrated in the links at the top.) Why is Jones doing this?


Wood filed a Request for Correction (RFC) with NIST, and this RFC is archived on a US Government website:
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandPrograms/Information_Quality/PRO D01_002619

Where is Jones' RFC? I don't see it there. Where is it? Where is the proof that he even sent one? No, a press release is not proof. Dr Wood sent her RFC registered mail, return receipt requested. Did Jones do this? I doubt it.

Jones is a cold fusion and 9/11 fraud. People need to wake up and look at the bigger picture to what's happening.

9/11 wasn't about the "Neocon political agenda", it was about energy. It was about population reduction. Read the info here and learn that Jones was a plant in 1989 to discredit free-energy research:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/125

Are you aware that, in 2004, Dr Eugene Mallove wrote an open letter to the world asking for research funds for Cold Fusion and Zero Point energy? A few months later, Eugene was murdered.

A very similar situation is of Michael Zebuhr, a 9/11 research student of Judy Wood's, who did experiments to prove Jones' research faulty. A few weeks later, he was murdered.

And then there's the Virginia Tech "inside job". Why didn't the police close off the area following that massacre? Perhaps it's because they knew who the perpetrators were. It just so happens that Judy Wood graduated from V-Tech and it was some of her instructors who were killed.

All Judy wants people to do is look at the data, the same data that Jones and his group discourage people from looking at. There is mass internet censorship of Dr Wood's work. Yet, it's her work that stands up to the facts.

People say that a directed energy weapon cannot "dustify" steel. But it can! Watch the film "Race To Zero Point" on google and you will learn. Zero Point... the same technology that Dr Mallove wanted research funds for. And then he was murdered.

People need to start thinking for themselves and looking at evidence. Where is the proof that Jones found evidence of thermate? For all we know his baggie could be contents from his vacuum bag.

Jones/Jenkins have ties to Los Alamos directed energy weapon research. This is the same technology that Judy Wood's censored work is about.

For everyone's sake, I hope the bigger picture is becoming clearer to everyone!

The new OGCT will soon become "conventional controlled demolition" of the towers and WTC 7 after "the airplanes hit". No mention of the round cylindrical holes in WTC 5, no mention of toasted cars, no mention of TV-Fakery. What will happen then? A new investigation based on the work of a former Los Alamos researcher? What will happen then? Impeach Bush? What will that do? We must remove the 9/11 perpetrators from power. This includes people associated with directed energy weapons, as well as the corporate media.

For the future of humanity, this is what must be done.

Are we now getting the bigger picture?

[CB_Brooklyn]

This post is dedicated to Fred, one of the best 9/11 researchers out there, who has proven time and time again that the CNN video is pure 2-D animation

[chek]

Yes we got the message some time ago, without your needing to restate it.
Everybody but everybody outside of the "researchers" cult is a perp.

And the limus test is whether you buy Fred's/Killtowns/Woods 'work'.

Check with Fred, if you're unclear, on what the meaning of 'vacuous twaddle' is.

It's the very definition of it.

[CB_Brooklyn]

[John White]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[flamesong]

[chek]

[John White]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[Stefan]

CB Brooklyn,
Perhaps you'd like to make a stab at a motive for this ploy?

The idea is that the "perps" construct a body of empirical and testimonial evidence which stands up to scientific scutiny for the controlled demolition of the world trade centre, and that follows that the planes that flew into the buildings were a part of the plan, and therefore the responsibility of those who set the demolition.

This red herring is a crime which supposedly took the life of 3000 people or thereabouts.

But in fact this is all a lie.

What actually happened is that they set off explosions in the buildings and faked planes hitting them, and the building was then destroyed by an unknown form of DEW technology, possibly from space.

The true crime took the life of 3000 people or thereabouts.

So we have two crimes which are equally grave, have an equal body count, and would need to have had the involvement of powerful figures of influence who could control and affect the workings of the US and possibly other government bodies.

Right?

So in terms of the details of the "fake crime" and the "real crime" we don't see any change in the profile of the perps, or the severity of the crime.

So what are the differences between the two accounts?

For one, there is a historical precident for buildings being destroyed by explosives, and for structures such as oil rigs being destroyed by a combination of explosives and steel cutting incendiaries - it is a more believable theory.

For two, they manufactured REAL evidence for the fake- such as the squibs or "decoy squibs" as judy wood calls them, the "faked" sight to molten metal pouring from the side of the south tower, and pre collapse explosions heard and felt by dozens of people. This fake evidence cannot be erased and is dammning to their official account of gravitational collapse...

...yet they contrived to insert this damming evidence because it was important to them that people believed the fake scenario, and not the real one.

Why? Both are equally dammning, equally criminal, and point toward the same people.

Where is the advantage for the perps in people believing that the towers were demolished by more conventional means and planes were really used?

Why contrive to manufacture fake evidence which in fact implemented THEM when the only advantage was making people think they did it through a different method?

Will you answer any of these questions or will you insult me?

I wonder....

[Stefan]

It's kind of like going to a police station and turning yourself in for a murder you didn't commit as a cunning alibi so you can't be placed at the scene of a murder you did...

[CB_Brooklyn]

[John White]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[chek]

[John White]

On the contrary, I've retained what you've abandoned: my wits about me

The only thing your evidence-less accusation against ae911truth has proved, once again, is that your only interest is denigration and disruption: and I see Killtown is at it as well today, starting a thread in order to have a good cry that Dylan Avery disagrees with him. Both threads are, strictly speaking, a breach of site guidelines and could be taken as grounds for suspension/banning

The only notable thing your "hero" Fred managed to achieve here was the demolition of his "research" and a banning for abusive behaviour. Perhaps you are considering emulating him, so that you too can massage your ego in the "brotherhood of the spurned" over at 9/11 researchers

Wow. You'll really be able to tell your grandchildren you achieved so much. You’re really opening minds here

I'm certainly content to observe that "TV Fakery" and "Hologram Planes" are heading for exactly where they deserve to be on the strength of the evidence presented to support them: the "Fantasist Theory" waste bin

[Stefan]

[Killtown]

[John White]

[Killtown]

[CB_Brooklyn]