controlled demolition is misinformation

[plane son on 911]

These photos are not of buildings destroyed in a controlled demolition

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=57

[marky 54]

[Micpsi]

[John White]

Any evidence of pulverised steel?

Exit, Wood

Enter: Plane impacts could not have brought the towers down

[utopiated]

If you've watched this forum over the long period when it moved from discussing the "pure" thermate theory to the gradual introduction of 'something else' into the equation you'll have seen a gradual softening to the idea.

Most people here will not admit this of course but I think I've seen it between the lines. First posters who tried to discuss the alternative/pulverisation/toasted cars stuff were laughed at, then there were attempts to remove people/posts - then it sort of calmed down.

It's fairly obvious something else was used we just don't know what it is. The strangely contorted vehicles some distance away are a giveaway and something a metal slicer or conventional demo system could not do. My bets are on mini nukes. Lots of evidence for these.

Exit: Collective denial
Enter: Open assessments of what's possible

[John White]

Enter: balanced by what is provable

Retain: planes impacts could not have brought the towers down,

Unite on: Official Story = *!

Exit: House and Campaign!