| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
 Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:45 am Post subject: Architect confirms WTC towers were rigged for demolition |
 |
|
In his second interview on May 21 with Mike Hagan on his Radio Orbit Show
http://kentroversypapers.blogspot.com/2007/04/bin-laden-construction-c ompany-worked.html
the former WTC architect/designer Paul Laffoley confirmed that he worked with Emery Roth and Sons, a prominent New York City architectual design firm, on the plans for floors 15-45 of the South Tower and that both towers had been designed for controlled demolition. Pressed by Mike Hagan on the issue whether explosives were kept permanently in the buildings, he seemed, shockingly, to indicate that this was the case.
Laffoley said that he thought the planes were targeted at points in the towers where electrical circuits would be activated to set off the pre-planted explosives. Obviously this is nothing more than his speculation, which we can reject as implausible. He clearly follows the official line that 19 Arab terrorists destroyed the towers, with the added speculation that they knew where all the explosives were located because the bin Laden Construction company had Saudi Arab engineers working on the WTC construction project, and so bin Laden's terrorists knew where the explosives were and crashed the planes at the place needed for the fires to set off all the explosives. He does not seem to know that electric signals, not fire, detonate explosives.
Once again the question is: is Laffoley a disinformation agent? I say no, because he would hardly be told to expose the deep secret that the towers had been designed for explosives to be quickly added without wiring needing to be done as well. This would explain how they could have been quickly rigged for demolition in the days leading up to 9/11 - something the perps would not want revealed. Nor would the perps be so dumb as to think that people would believe that the 19 terrorists knew how to set off all the explosives in the towers by targetting their planes at the right spot, nor, alternatively, that this happened accidentally owing to the fires. It would be far too risky for such sensitive information to be released in order to anticipate a situation in which the government is forced to admit there were explosions in the towers, so as to have a ready-made explanation for why they happened. People would not believe this new scenario as some forced admission by the government because they would know that the government had lied to them all along about the cause of the destruction of the towers and so would be lying again as to what or who set off the charges. No. The disinformation interpretation is implausible because it leads to a scenario that remains too risky for the perps to create. Releasing this information would not get the perps off the hook of explaining how there could be explosives in the towers, having been forced finally to admit to their existence. The accusation that this is disinformation does not make sense. Ignoring Laffoley's statement simply because he is an artist with a creative imagination or someone one deems a crank is, frankly, risible.
Laffoley has therefore provided trustworthy information explaining how the towers could be rigged for explosives quickly without anyone noticing. The wiring was already laid in the towers. All that was needed was for people to bring in detonation charges that they connected up at all the known locations chosen from the beginning to be those necessary for demolishing the towers. Simple as that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
 whos fooling who?
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Snowygrouch
Validated Poster
Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 628
Location: Oxford
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I personally think its highly implausable,
However I also think (unless this guy is just nuts or an attention seeker) that this is an attempt by "them" to start putting out a cover story to allow them "plauable deniability" in the event of CD becoming widespread knowledge and the consequences of that.
I reckon the signs point to this being the start of damage limitation.
Could be wrong of course...but as discussed before this story stretches many technical arguments to the point of no return.
We`ll see.
C.
_________________
The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist
President Eisenhower 1961 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stefan
Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006
Posts: 1219
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 8:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
I've listened to an interview with him before and this guy is a little away with the fairies to say the very least. Great painter though...
_________________
Peace and Truth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
xmasdale
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1959
Location: South London
|
| Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: Re: Architect confirms WTC towers were rigged for demolition |
|
|
| Micpsi wrote: |
Once again the question is: is Laffoley a disinformation agent? I say no, because he would hardly be told to expose the deep secret that the towers had been designed for explosives to be quickly added without wiring needing to be done as well. This would explain how they could have been quickly rigged for demolition in the days leading up to 9/11 - something the perps would not want revealed. Nor would the perps be so dumb as to think that people would believe that the 19 terrorists knew how to set off all the explosives in the towers by targetting their planes at the right spot, nor, alternatively, that this happened accidentally owing to the fires. It would be far too risky for such sensitive information to be released in order to anticipate a situation in which the government is forced to admit there were explosions in the towers, so as to have a ready-made explanation for why they happened. People would not believe this new scenario as some forced admission by the government because they would know that the government had lied to them all along about the cause of the destruction of the towers and so would be lying again as to what or who set off the charges. No. The disinformation interpretation is implausible because it leads to a scenario that remains too risky for the perps to create. Releasing this information would not get the perps off the hook of explaining how there could be explosives in the towers, having been forced finally to admit to their existence. The accusation that this is disinformation does not make sense. Ignoring Laffoley's statement simply because he is an artist with a creative imagination or someone one deems a crank is, frankly, risible.
Laffoley has therefore provided trustworthy information explaining how the towers could be rigged for explosives quickly without anyone noticing. The wiring was already laid in the towers. All that was needed was for people to bring in detonation charges that they connected up at all the known locations chosen from the beginning to be those necessary for demolishing the towers. Simple as that. |
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
--From Hamlet (III, ii, 239)
Queen Gertrude speaks these famous words to her son, Prince Hamlet, while watching a play at court. Gertrude does not realize that Hamlet has staged this play to trap her and her new husband, King Claudius, whom Hamlet suspects of having murdered his father. She also does not realize that the lady who "doth protest too much" is actually herself, as the Player King and Queen represent King Hamlet and Queen Gertrude. The former will be poisoned (in this play within the play) by the king's brother, as in reality (Hamlet suspects) Claudius killed King Hamlet. Gertrude's statement is in response to the play-Queen's repetitive statements of loyalty to and love of her first husband. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
plane son on 911
Minor Poster
Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 93
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:24 pm Post subject: Re: Architect confirms WTC towers were rigged for demolition |
|
|
| xmasdale wrote: | | Micpsi wrote: |
Once again the question is: is Laffoley a disinformation agent? I say no, because he would hardly be told to expose the deep secret that the towers had been designed for explosives to be quickly added without wiring needing to be done as well. This would explain how they could have been quickly rigged for demolition in the days leading up to 9/11 - something the perps would not want revealed. Nor would the perps be so dumb as to think that people would believe that the 19 terrorists knew how to set off all the explosives in the towers by targetting their planes at the right spot, nor, alternatively, that this happened accidentally owing to the fires. It would be far too risky for such sensitive information to be released in order to anticipate a situation in which the government is forced to admit there were explosions in the towers, so as to have a ready-made explanation for why they happened. People would not believe this new scenario as some forced admission by the government because they would know that the government had lied to them all along about the cause of the destruction of the towers and so would be lying again as to what or who set off the charges. No. The disinformation interpretation is implausible because it leads to a scenario that remains too risky for the perps to create. Releasing this information would not get the perps off the hook of explaining how there could be explosives in the towers, having been forced finally to admit to their existence. The accusation that this is disinformation does not make sense. Ignoring Laffoley's statement simply because he is an artist with a creative imagination or someone one deems a crank is, frankly, risible.
Laffoley has therefore provided trustworthy information explaining how the towers could be rigged for explosives quickly without anyone noticing. The wiring was already laid in the towers. All that was needed was for people to bring in detonation charges that they connected up at all the known locations chosen from the beginning to be those necessary for demolishing the towers. Simple as that. |
"The lady doth protest too much, methinks."
--From Hamlet (III, ii, 239)
Queen Gertrude speaks these famous words to her son, Prince Hamlet, while watching a play at court. Gertrude does not realize that Hamlet has staged this play to trap her and her new husband, King Claudius, whom Hamlet suspects of having murdered his father. She also does not realize that the lady who "doth protest too much" is actually herself, as the Player King and Queen represent King Hamlet and Queen Gertrude. The former will be poisoned (in this play within the play) by the king's brother, as in reality (Hamlet suspects) Claudius killed King Hamlet. Gertrude's statement is in response to the play-Queen's repetitive statements of loyalty to and love of her first husband. |
Xmasdale you make a very good point, I think you are a genuine truther |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rodin
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
The artist and his all-seeing art...
http://technorati.com/videos/youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DmC0gQyBftAk
Looks like a NWO POS to me (Art and artist/architect)
Logical scientific paper that precedes S Jones interest in the subject
Conclusions
| Quote: | In this paper we have attempted to establish the amount of thermite that would be necessary to melt a box column at or near the base of the WTC towers’ cores, to see if the amount necessary was physically feasible, or would require an unrealistic amount sure to attract detection before its use. We have used thermal parameters for iron, and assumed thermite as the chemical compound. The analysis is thus imperfect, since the structural steel used may have slightly different properties, requiring more (or less) of the chemical compound. A different, more sophisticated compound may have required even less volume than has been calculated here.
Still the implications are clear: such a melting of a section of all the inner core box pillars is possible, using relatively simple technology. Such compounds could have been applied to the interior or the exterior of even the largest of these columns in a surreptitious manner, to accomplish the task of melting and collapse. The amount necessary for complete melting of a segment of even the largest box column was calculated, and found possible. Of course complete melting was not necessary to cause total failure: a lesser amount of a thermite-like compound could have been used to raise the temperature of the steel to a point where the columns would fail before melting, although some melting must have occurred to account for the steel pools.
It is pure speculation if, how, and when this was done. The columns would have been most easily filled during the initial construction phase, but this requires belief in a foresight and 30-40 year "master plan" that may be difficult for many to think possible. (Many buildings are constructed with ultimate demolition in the design, to make way for future construction in urban areas. Usually, the building design includes cavities for controlled demolition explosive placement. The non-availability of WTC tower blueprints makes it difficult to assess this possibility).
However, there have been undoubtedly a number of opportunities under the guise of maintenance: many stories exist about problems with the "insulation" adhering to the steel support structures of the WTC towers. Also, the first attack on the WTC towers in 1993, in the basement of the complex, offered an opportunity for access and "repair" to demolition experts and construction personnel. Thermite is a relatively safe compound, requiring high temperature to initiate reaction - a magnesium fuse is commonly used. We will probably never know exactly what sequence of events unfolded to culminate in the WTC collapses of 11 September 2001. |
http://physics911.net/thermite
_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
