FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

More proof that 9/11 planes were 'faked'?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Evans_England
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 29

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mason-free party wrote:
Micpsi wrote:
mason-free party wrote:
Looks like no planers were right all along...Andrew,i think its wake up time for alot on here


The fact that you have to keep anxiously saying that so often proves that you know you don't have anything convincing to offer. It's more about saving face and pretending you are right, now, isn't it, than genuinely trying to convince others of your thesis. It's now the no planes cult that stands on the street corner of every 9/11 forum, spamming their vacuous, promotional videos for new members, but painfully aware that nearly everyone has stopped paying attention.


no planes cult?...i just look at the evidence mate and it points to no planes at all 3 sites...someone said but what about the engine they found at the bottom of one of the twin towers?...but forgot to mention there was no crater beneath the engine...a case of being dumped from truck level



Can u imagine the force of an airplane going 500+ mph through a building?

So the engine shoots out off the building - the plane doesnt... sounds right so far.

The engine where it was pictured, would not just have landed there and stopped there, it would have hit something, kept moving and gradually come to the point where it was in the picture.

Its obvious two planes, whether they be modified in whatever way 767's hit each building, eyewitnesses, video footage, impact holes, audio footage, show this.

But i do not beleive these imacts made the building collapsed, so lets talk about what did! Instead of turning our brains to mush talking about irrelevant stuff. How would america be able to convince the world 9/11 was terrorists, if one of their own security cameras someone stole showed no planes actually hit the buildings! The planes had to hit them.

And for people who say the steel was bent the wrong way....
On both impacts the planes go in then where they entered and on other facias of the building explosions come back out from fuel/debris ect.

Can it be proved that if those planes, and those standard 767 passenger planes alone hit each tower, in the same place they did, in the same state they did, that the after math would be the same....

I mean WTC1and 2 collapsing at freefall speed, leaving loads of seperated steel, and concrete dust everywhere, and into the foundations, and with thousands of bodies never found (vapourized) and with molten iron burning for weeks and weeks after, and sweet fook all left of the structures - apart from 4 to 15 floors of perimeter collumns, and up to 10 stumps of core collumns left after?

Of course that can be proved impossible, but exact replicas of each part of them would not have to be made - there are plenty of simpler ways to prove more things happened....

And im not even going into why the took out WTC7 as well...

Lets move forward, not get stuck on stupid things.

_________________
9/11 - Only in america...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TmcMistress
Mind Gamer
Mind Gamer


Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 392

PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 5:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laetrile wrote:
1. What did they do with all the people?
2. What did they do with the 'actual' planes?
3. Why do the holes in the buildings just happen to coincide with... planes?
4. Are you seriously suggesting that they bribed / cajoled / faked every single actual, physical eyewitness to the events in NY that day?


1. There were no people, they made the names up.

2. There were no planes.

3. That's where they either set off bombs or targeted the DEW.

4. Most of the so called eye witnesses worked for the tv companies.


I asked for reasonable, non-speculative answers. You have absolutely NO proof, circumstantial or otherwise, for any of those. Also, your answer to #4 is just silly.


Alwun- It's not a matter, for me, of picking and choosing evidence just for * n' giggles. It's a matter of NPT theories being in direct contradiction to visual and physical evidence, not to mention common sense. It drives me insane, to be honest. I want to get as many people to realize "Hey, that 9/11 thing sure was fishy" as possible, and overly speculative theories about NPT do not help. About all they accomplish is to turn people away from the whole thing.

Really, please, for the love of all things holy, answer me this: Why would they ("they" being whoever was at the top tier behind 9/11) muck around with fake passenger lists, fake planes, fake news broadcasts, expertly placed explosives to not only bring the towers down but create perfectly plane-shaped holes, and involve having ALL those people (from the firemen to the newscasters to the 'witnesses' to the FAA employees, etc. etc. etc) know what's going on...

when they could just make sure our air defense forces are out of the way, and arrange for REAL planes, with REAL people, to be crashed into the buildings? Mind you, conveniently shooting down the 4th and passing it off as a "hero" story... NPT makes NO sense!

_________________
"What about a dance club that only let in deaf people? It would really only need flashing lights, so they'd save a lot of money on music." - Dresden Codak
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Easy Rider
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 94

PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John White wrote:
Lyceum wrote:
I struggle to understand this fantasy 'remote controlled' nonsense. Lying for truth, lying for truth.


Amazing that. Tell me something: Why do you think "Operation Northwoods" in the early 1960's involved the use of Remote Controlled passenger jets?



What evidence do you have that Operation Northwoods is a genuine document?

To assume that it is genuine you would by the same token expect "Operation 911" to be a document waiting to be released under freedom of information...................don't think so

Operation Northwoods was too convenient being released when it was.........................it's bogus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> 9/11 & 7/7 Truth Controversies All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group