| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Laetrile
New Poster
Joined: 16 Jun 2007
Posts: 7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:52 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Do I detect the dull-and-rapidly-becoming-boring trappings of no-planery/TV fakery wrapped in this question?
The answer is the wake vortices would be where they would always be - trailing from the wingtips of a moving aircraft.
Once the aircraft stopped moving on impact, the generating force would also terminate and the larger, smoke disturbing vortices well behind the aircraft would spin down and dissipate - still well behind the point in space where the plane had been, and well to the sides and beyond the fuel explosions on entry.
I'm guessing the standard NPT fallacy (and there's always one) in play here is that the vortices are somehow an independent, forward-moving mass of air that should have continued on into the WTC, when they are not. Wakes are the evidence of movement left behind by a body moving through a slower moving or still fluid, in this case air.
This diagram shows the phenomenom fairly clearly.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Do I detect the dull-and-rapidly-becoming-boring trappings of no-planery/TV fakery wrapped in this question? |
Well, its a newly minted account....if we get passed today without you being called a Shill Gatekeeper I'll be surprised.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kc
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 359
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
WoW! The ignorance on that other forum is hilarious!!!!
| Quote: | | I have yet to hear one single peep, about anything knocked over, lifted into the air, or anyone or any thing knocked right over by such turbulence either. |
That would be apart from the enormous skyscrapers and the gaping holes in them I suppose? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kc wrote: | | WoW! The ignorance on that other forum is hilarious!!!! |
yes it is quite funny - as is the fact that the forum seems to consist of a handful of the NPT cult who basically take it in turns to pat each other on the back....
| NPTard wrote: | | When an aircraft wing generates lift, it also produces horizontal, tornado-like vortices that create a potential wake-vortex hazard problem for other aircraft trailing. The powerful, high-velocity airflows contained in the wake behind the generating aircraft are long-lived, invisible, and a serious threat to aircraft encountering the system, especially small general aviation aircraft. |
in view of the above claims - I wonder how formation flying is possible?
perhaps laetrile & co can enlighten me with their expert knowledge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blackcat
Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 2376
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The vortex isn't a prroblem with smaller planes - only an issue with jumbo jets. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gruts
Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007
Posts: 1050
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
not according to this lot. the OP illustrates the words I quoted with this picture.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | When a bullet hits a person and punches an ENTRY WOUND into the skin, there is a brief delay before blood begins flowing out from the entry hole. The bullet wound appears as a dark hole on the skin's outer surface BEFORE any exit bleeding commences. FACT
Impact - full penetration - scar visible - delay - explosion : real aircraft
Impact - full penetration - exiting explosion - scar visible : ghost airliners and High Explosive shape-charge ordnance detonated in perfect sequence from within each tower
|
http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?showtopic=116
Can anyone explain how the opening paragraph has any conceivable relevance to the subsequent assertion about this old 'delayed explosion' chestnut?
Unless...
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rodin
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chek wrote: | Do I detect the dull-and-rapidly-becoming-boring trappings of no-planery/TV fakery wrapped in this question?
The answer is the wake vortices would be where they would always be - trailing from the wingtips of a moving aircraft.
Once the aircraft stopped moving on impact, the generating force would also terminate and the larger, smoke disturbing vortices well behind the aircraft would spin down and dissipate - still well behind the point in space where the plane had been, and well to the sides and beyond the fuel explosions on entry.
I'm guessing the standard NPT fallacy (and there's always one) in play here is that the vortices are somehow an independent, forward-moving mass of air that should have continued on into the WTC, when they are not. Wakes are the evidence of movement left behind by a body moving through a slower moving or still fluid, in this case air.
This diagram shows the phenomenom fairly clearly.
|
correct.
Easier to visualise the wake from a boat. Same principle.
_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
