View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pikey Banned
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1491 Location: North Lancashire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Internet explorer cannot open the internet site (url) operation aborted |
However, the page did initally load before this unprecedented (in my experience) message popped up.
Anyone know what is going on here? _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CB_Brooklyn Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 168 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dr Wood is aware of the problem with Internet Explorer and is planning to move her site soon. In the meantime, use firefox (which everyone should be using anyway!) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MFP, this is a pathetic tactic to try and get Beam weapons in general chat
Desist immediately: any further out of section posts will be deleted _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elohim Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 76 Location: Ipswich
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Works fine with Firefox, dump IE.
Appears to be a bug in IE handling the CSact Javascript with an undefined variable.
Who Knows....
EL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 1616
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes it worked fine with Firefox for me, too.
Nice hat. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John White wrote: | MFP, this is a pathetic tactic to try and get Beam weapons in general chat |
I thought so too until IE would not let me in. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CB_Brooklyn Posted: Jun 11 2007, 05:32 AM
One must understand what's going on here; it's not that difficult to.
I made numerous posts in the ae911truth forum, the most recent ones including the following links:
911 Octopus 8: Media Perps Unmasked
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_ySSJ_L6Zs
These Videos of REAL Plane Crashes Explain 9/11 TV-Fakery Very Clearly
http://www.911researchers.com/node/98
I also posted links to Dr Judy Wood's new work:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt1.html
Less than 24 hours later, Gage disabled the forums. This did not come as a surprise actually, since Gage is promoting Steven Jones and is therefore a 9/11 Coverup Perp distracting people from the REAL provable inside job evidence of Exotic Weaponry and TV-Fakery at the WTC.
Steven Jones worked at Los Alamos where directed energy weapons are researched.
Another Cover Up Perp, Greg Jenkins, did an ambush interview of Dr Judy Wood. It has recently been discovered that Jenkins' has ties to the NSA. Only after a close analysis of this interview:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/Jenkins_transcript.html did Dr Wood realize what Jenkins wanted kept secret.
Judy's new paper is based on the data that Jones/Jenkins want kept hidden:
Molecular Dissociation: from Dust to Dirt
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/dirt1.html
Jones and his group have been doing everything possible to discourage people from looking at Judy Wood's directed energy weapon work and the obvious TV-Fakery evidence. (Yes, obvious, as demonstrated in the links at the top.) Why is Jones doing this?
Wood filed a Request for Correction (RFC) with NIST, and this RFC is archived on a US Government website:
http://www.ocio.os.doc.gov/ITPolicyandProg...y/PROD01_002619
Where is Jones' RFC? I don't see it there. Where is it? Where is the proof that he even sent one? No, a press release is not proof. Dr Wood sent her RFC registered mail, return receipt requested. Did Jones do this? I doubt it.
Jones is a cold fusion and 9/11 fraud. People need to wake up and look at the bigger picture to what's happening.
9/11 wasn't about the "Neocon political agenda", it was about energy. It was about population reduction. Read the info here and learn that Jones was a plant in 1989 to discredit free-energy research:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/125
Are you aware that, in 2004, Dr Eugene Mallove wrote an open letter to the world asking for research funds for Cold Fusion and Zero Point energy? A few months later, Eugene was murdered.
A very similar situation is of Michael Zebuhr, a 9/11 research student of Judy Wood's, who did experiments to prove Jones' research faulty. A few weeks later, he was murdered.
And then there's the Virginia Tech "inside job". Why didn't the police close off the area following that massacre? Perhaps it's because they knew who the perpetrators were. It just so happens that Judy Wood graduated from V-Tech and it was some of her instructors who were killed, one of them in the very classroom she sat in. The first murder took place in the only dorm she used on campus.
All Judy wants people to do is look at the data, the same data that Jones and his group discourage people from looking at. There is mass internet censorship of Dr Wood's work. Yet, it's her work that stands up to the facts.
People say that a directed energy weapon cannot "dustify" steel. But it can! Watch the film "Race To Zero Point" on google and you will learn. Zero Point... the same technology that Dr Mallove wanted research funds for. And then he was murdered.
People need to start thinking for themselves and looking at evidence. Where is the proof that Jones found evidence of thermate? For all we know his baggie could be contents from his vacuum cleaner.
Jones/Jenkins have ties to Los Alamos directed energy weapon research. This is the same technology that Judy Wood's censored work is about.
For everyone's sake, I hope the bigger picture is becoming clearer to everyone!
The new OGCT will soon become "conventional controlled demolition" of the towers and WTC 7 after "the airplanes hit". No mention of the round cylindrical holes in WTC 5, no mention of toasted cars, no mention of TV-Fakery. What will happen then? A new investigation based on the work of a former Los Alamos researcher? What will happen then? Impeach Bush? What will that do? We must remove the 9/11 perpetrators from power. This includes people associated with directed energy weapons, as well as the corporate media.
For the future of humanity, this is what must be done.
Are we now getting the bigger picture? _________________ http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John White wrote: | MFP, this is a pathetic tactic to try and get Beam weapons in general chat
Desist immediately: any further out of section posts will be deleted |
john...you are joking i hope?...no one tells me what not to post...i am so * mad _________________ http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mason-free party wrote: | John White wrote: | MFP, this is a pathetic tactic to try and get Beam weapons in general chat
Desist immediately: any further out of section posts will be deleted |
john...you are joking i hope?...no one tells me what not to post...i am so * mad |
I'm not telling you what to post: I'm telling you where to post it: and you know full well that NFP and Beam Weapons posts go into controversies. End of story. What is this, the third out of section thread in 24 hours?
So if you find me getting testy with you, its becuase you are making work for me and not respecting the established framework of the site _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
utopiated Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 645 Location: UK Midlands
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing is John - if the site *was* being taken down/not available for reasons other than a browser config error or whatever then it would be considered general [and important] 9/11 news and not just some underhand way of getting DEW issues discussed. _________________ http://exopolitics.org.uk
http://chemtrailsUK.net
http://alienfalseflagagenda.net
-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mason-free party wrote: | Does it not make you suspicious that steven jones worked on the energy beam project in los alomos and conveniently breaks up the scholars for 911 truth when some like judy wood start talking DEWS |
Tell you what - I think it's highly suspicious that the Virginia Tech massacre eliminated the majority of Wood's old faculty.
Apart from silencing those with a genuine insight into her credibility, what else might she have stood to gain from that?
That CB_Brooklyn thing you imported (and I assume you agree with in full) is chok-full with similar grade shoite.
Do you begin to see where your ridiculous "researcher" inspired conspiracies might conceivably go, if you really want to start down that road? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chek wrote: | Tell you what - I think it's highly suspicious that the Virginia Tech massacre eliminated the majority of Wood's old faculty.
Apart from silencing those with a genuine insight into her credibility, what else might she have stood to gain from that? |
WHAAAAAT?!?!?! --- do you have the full sp on this Chek? After the Zebuhr whack too. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rodin wrote: | chek wrote: | Tell you what - I think it's highly suspicious that the Virginia Tech massacre eliminated the majority of Wood's old faculty.
Apart from silencing those with a genuine insight into her credibility, what else might she have stood to gain from that? |
WHAAAAAT?!?!?! --- do you have the full sp on this Chek? After the Zebuhr whack too. |
I couldn't possibly comment on what Wood may or may not have known about Zebuhr's movements that day.
But I do know that no good can come of trying to make molten aluminium glow in near dark conditions. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rodin wrote: | http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&a ddress=125x158861#158868
that cbrooklyn person seems to be touting a v-tec/woods connection. I had cb in the very likley disinfo folder...
Do you have more on this? |
If you're asking do I have hard copy statements actually in my hands of CB's Langley, Quantico and Tel Aviv fed over-stuffed bank accounts - no, I don't.
At least, none have so far been discovered.
But as the biblicals like to put it, "by their fruits shall ye know them"... _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tell you what though Chek - Jones smells fishy.
There is something going down here and I don't know what it is. But CD is proven by the freefall speeds alone. If we can't charge the perps when we have proof, getting the exact MO ain't gonna change anything. They sem invulnerable to justice.
I think 7 conventional bottom down, 1 & 2 more exotic. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rodin wrote: | Tell you what though Chek - Jones smells fishy.
There is something going down here and I don't know what it is. But CD is proven by the freefall speeds alone. If we can't charge the perps when we have proof, getting the exact MO ain't gonna change anything. They sem invulnerable to justice.
I think 7 conventional bottom down, 1 & 2 more exotic. |
I can sort of see where you're coming from on the Jones angle - the mormon america-visiting Jesus thing is .... whacky to say the least.
But that's a faith thing, and I'm equally sure Bush's - or for that matter your's or my - internal Sky-gods are equally whacky when objectively evaluated.
The Los Alamos connection is also a possible alarm bell - until you realise that American society is an Empire feeding a widely recognised military-industrial complex tuned to maintain Empire. Of course Empires have a life-cycle that no amount of avoidance activity that ever actually succeed in avoiding. But apart from arms - what heavy US industries actually remain? Hollywood?
Los Alamos is where the money is if you are interested in certain fields of research. It's where any researcher will end up if they require major funding. It used to be similar here in the UK until the 1960's incarnation of the CFR killed off the UK and Canadian competition in the military industries.
I believe Jones pursuit and discovery of molten iron on the WTC sites to be the single biggest piece of evidence to date.
Free fall speeds are supportive, but on their own, capable of being transformed into technical flim-flamming to a jury of our peers by any sharp lawyer.
But the presence of molten iron created during collapse - not by jetfuel, not in some unlikely natural kiln-effect underground fires afterwards, is killer evidence - if presented in such a way that its significance is fully understood.
So for that alone, I consider Steve Jones' work to be irreplaceable and without his findings (which are still there even if he photographed tomorrow snorting coke off Cheney's dick while jointly roasting Paris Hilton), there would be a much less effective truth movement.
Screw the 'links'. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us.
Last edited by chek on Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:16 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mason-free party wrote: | i'll tell you what John...the more i look into Judy Woods work the more i'm convinced she is right...can't believe i wasted all that energy on looking for bloody pods underneath wings of non existant planes.Does it not make you suspicious that steven jones worked on the energy beam project in los alomos and conveniently breaks up the scholars for 911 truth when some like judy wood start talking DEWS
http://coffinmansblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/steven-jones-linked-to-neut rino.html
ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT 911 SHILL STEVEN JONES |
if steven jones was working for the perps why would he draw attention to anything that said the towers were destroyed by anything other than jet fuel and fires?
why would they want millions of people to be convinced 9/11 was an inside job rather than poor ability to react to the situation.
lots of things can seem suspious but that dos'nt mean they are, for example:
i suspect if steven jones is bang on with his theory the perps would panic, so how would they respond? create a few theorys to divert attention and then use the leaders of those theorys to attack and discredit s.jones.
both theorys divert truthers and get support but are used mainly to discredit jones, which is what we see constantly.
none of the evidence has been very convincing but that dos'nt matter that aint the purpose of them, its also funny how the pushers of the two other theorys also attack willie rodriguez.
they seem more like campaigns to discredit those who have been a leading influence to spread and make people aware of the need to question the offical story whilst promoting disinfo.
although i think this it dos'nt mean im right and i certainly would'nt set up a website to attack j.woods and NPT, where as those theorys have gone to extreme lenghts to discredit others rather than prove their own theorys to be true, if beams and NPT is correct then the evidence will show this, there is no reason at all to attack s.jones or w.rodriguez unless of course that is your agenda.
my theory is you need s.jones to be wrong for you to be right, diverting from truth to disinfo.
s.jones is 90% correct IMO but i think j.wood is correct that something else was used also, although i believe she is barking up the wrong tree with energy weapons and she should be looking towards mini nuke followed by CD. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got the same message trying to access Judy Wood's site.
Mind you, I've been having access problems to this site also.
Intermittent page not found etc., as well as the awful but of late slightly improved access times. _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eh? 9/11 was'nt an insidejob check out the mainstream media |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree, in my view there is no mechanism within the OCT that can account for molten iron spheroids being present during collapse. There are very few mechanisms that can explain it - period.
Meanwhile Judy Wood is quoted on her site saying "Does fire cause instant rust? I don't think so".
Fire oxidises what it burns. That's what combustion does. Rust is oxidation. Did Judy Wood even take an hour in the lab to verify her statement? Or is it another of her 'Grand Piano that takes 36 seconds to fall from the top of the WTC' moments?
The woman is not credible, yet you choose to overlook these glaring errors.
One has to ask, who exactly is falling for a ruse here? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the mainstream media says 9/11 was not anside job
if i provided a link and said look at this what would it prove?
s.jones says the towers came down due to thermite reaction/CD
if i provided a link and said read this what would it prove?
it could go on for eternity.
i suggest explaining why you believe it and what you think the strongest points are otherwise there is nothing to discuss.
we all believe differant things where the how is concerned and it can simply be countered by providing a link to something that says differant to the link you provided.
which is why you need to explain ferther rather than just saying "here read this" to which i could reply "here read this"
theres so much info and bull out there simply providing a link without explainations on:
1. why you think it
2. which parts you feel are the strongest evidence
3. why you believe j.woods over s.jones on this issue etc.
won't change peoples opinons.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2005/121105twintowers.htm
http://wtc7.net/articles/stevenjones_b7.html
read these
does me simply providing the link make them correct? nope it don't, not without me providing an arguement and pointing out why i think it and what leads me to my conclusions and why i think only s.jones is correct and why j.woods is wrong or vice versa.
listening to one or the other without forming or explaining your own opinon is the same as repeating and believing what the mainstream media says. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 4:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
can't see whats wrong with providing a link ...then anyone can read it and make up their own mind...sometimes just a click and a picture can paint a thousand words of rock solid evidence. _________________ http://www.mindcontrolforums.com/pro-freedom.co.uk/part_6.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 5:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
mason-free party wrote: | can't see whats wrong with providing a link ...then anyone can read it and make up their own mind...sometimes just a click and a picture can paint a thousand words of rock solid evidence. |
i did'nt say there was anything wrong with providing a link.
im basically saying giving links on there own can easily be answered with another link.
the sheeple follow the offical line then wake up and all that happens is people to turn into sheeple following j.woods/s.jones, just posting and repeating what j.woods say's or s.jone's says but the individual never gives their reasons for thinking its correct, that was all i was saying. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mason-free party Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005 Posts: 765 Location: Staffordshire
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|