| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mason-free party
Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Location: Staffordshire
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mason-free party
Moderate Poster
Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Posts: 765
Location: Staffordshire
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:42 am Post subject: |
 |
|
the first clip is 50 seconds long so it's obvious which part your talking about there.
the second film is almost 10 minutes, it might help if you give a time reference to the bit your talking about. or is this just another excuse to keep spamming semtember clues? which must be in 20 plus active threads at the moment.
going by what you have said so far, if the smoke is going in the opposite direction to the smoke in the other film what does it prove?
the naudets faked it? or the makers of the other film faked it? both are possible and there is no evidence from this so far that only pinpoints one or the other being the deceptive film maker. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ray Ubinger
Minor Poster
Joined: 09 Apr 2007
Posts: 90
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 4:13 pm Post subject: Re: Naudet's film of 2nd tower hit....spot the mistake? |
|
|
| Ray Ubinger wrote: | What I spot is that the cameraman purposely, vigorously, mysteriously tilts down--AWAY from the action--AFTER the "plane" crashes, AFTER the fireball starts.
Wow! Shock and horror! So what's mysterious about that? The great shock of seeing and hearing the sudden, totally unexpected explosion would plausibly have caused an involuntary movement in the body of many a cameraman filming the tower. Indeed, I would have become suspicious if the camera had stayed on the shot in this circumstance.
And then the editor makes THREE CUTS WITHIN ONE SECOND.
Big deal! So what? The editor could have a dozen reasons for doing this. For example, censoring the utterance of the four-letter swear word spoken by the cameraman so that he could make the video footage presentable to the public, or deleting frames where the camera is swinging wildly during the reaction of the cameraman to the fireball. That's the trouble with you no-planers who pick on trivial, innocent things in 9/11 videos and turn them into evidence for a huge media conspiracy: your paranoia makes you lack common sense.
See Scott Loughrey's page
http://www.911hoax.com/gNaudetWTC1_9.asp?intPage=46&PageNum=46
aka
http://tinyurl.com/5h9bw
and my-and-Webfairy's page
http://911foreknowledge.com/n2hit.htm
Ray Ubinger
Durham NC USA
http://911foreknowledge.com
exposing the Naudet-FDNY snuff film since 2004
edited typo |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
