View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David WJ Sherlock Validated Poster
Joined: 07 Jan 2007 Posts: 471 Location: Kent GB
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mediadisbeliever Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 128 Location: North Humberside
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with the fact that there should be a recommended limit on the number of children being born into one family as we are overpopulated in this country. Sorry, but it's true! Secondly, I disagree wholeheartedly with the pathetic reasons they're giving for the recommendations on child limits.
We all know that the airlines are largely to blame for global warming, but if the government taxes them, the tax just gets passed on to the passenger.
Why doesn't the think tank place a recommended limit to the number of aircraft in the sky Oh hang-on, they can't do that to big business ...the ones who largely help fund think tanks.
Makes me sick!
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David WJ Sherlock Validated Poster
Joined: 07 Jan 2007 Posts: 471 Location: Kent GB
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pegasus wrote: | I agree with the fact that there should be a recommended limit on the number of children being born into one family as we are overpopulated in this country. Sorry, but it's true! Secondly, I disagree wholeheartedly with the pathetic reasons they're giving for the recommendations on child limits.
We all know that the airlines are largely to blame for global warming, but if the government taxes them, the tax just gets passed on to the passenger.
Why doesn't the think tank place a recommended limit to the number of aircraft in the sky :?: Oh hang-on, they can't do that to big business :!: ...the ones who largely help fund think tanks.
Makes me sick!
Ian | Hi Ian.
i agree with you on the whole. but I have to disagree with your stance on family limitation. I come from a large family and was the last born. I the world they want today. i would not have been born by law. The main reason we are over-populated is because we have no real border control anymore. I am not a racist and beleive we should have a resonably diverse culture, but this administration has gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.
Dave. _________________ "It's called the American Dream, because you have to be alseep to believe it"
See my videos at:
http://www.myspace.com/GlassAsylum For D WJ Sherlock |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mediadisbeliever Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 128 Location: North Humberside
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I come from a large family and was the last born. I the world they want today. i would not have been born by law |
Ok, David I take your point on that one, but I should have explained my reasoning behind my view on child limits.
Many of us here are totally aware of the NWO and some of their plans for us on a global scale. However, it is highly likely that a percentage of their plans will come to fruition and we will end-up as micro-chipped prisoners on the planet with nowhere to escape. Why should we bring more children into a world like this when there is a probability of this occuring?
Until we can be sure that the war against the NWO has been won I would tend to agree with limitations on bringing innocent children into this NWO.
I wish I could paint a more optimistic picture David.
Cheers
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mediadisbeliever Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 128 Location: North Humberside
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | And you, Pegasus, can be the first volunteer over the cliff to show us ignorami the way to reduce the population.
200 Brownie points from the Grand Master for pushing forward the NWO agenda.
|
You fail to see my point Mr Gosling. I am anti-NWO all the way! But I have reserved enough empathy towards the plight of the innocent, for as Alex Jones and others have predicted "we're on the brink of World War Three".
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The club o' Rome announced their intention to push this false meme that the enemy of humanity is humanity itself. Forget who it was predicted children would volunteer for sterilisation to save the planet.
The real enemy of humanity is the usurical* elite (is that a word?) _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
to many people miss the point about this subject.
it has nothing to do with global warming, so if that is being pushed it is rubbish.
it has nothing to do with the NWO or their plans.
lets just assume for a moment the nwo and global warming do not exsist.
how much population can this planet sustain? if we are under the impression it is limitless then we as a race will find our selves in deep trouble in the future.
are there enough fish to sustain 20billion people ? are there enough trees? and what ever else is consumed by people with the way we live today?.
echo systems will collapse and resources will run out because they are being taken faster than they can grow back.
this is the issue if the subject is about having less children.
having less children means the population will gradually reduce or rise slower taking a weight of the amount we consume from the planet giving nature a chance to replenish and grow back some of what has been lost so far.
its crazy to think the population can keep rising and the planet will have a limitless amount of resources to sustain it.
imagine all that exsisted was a field, now imagine two locust on that field who breed and start a population of locust.
there eventually would only be one outcome if the locust just continued to breed with no care of the actions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|