| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342
|
 Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:50 pm Post subject: More apologies from the BBC |
 |
|
The main news at the moment on Radio Five Live 'Drive' is that BBC have been faking competition phone-ins, and therefore losing BBC credability!
Anyone remember that the Blue Peter competition failure aired at the same time that news of News 24 reporting WTC7 collapse 25 mins early hit the web?
It also has been anounced rather casually that people will be struck off a) as a result of this and b) due to general cut backs, so in otherwords another which hunt is going on?
Here is my thoughts in a nutshell and forwarded to 'Drive':-
| Quote: | | The BBC will continue to lose credability so long as it bends to the needs of the Government. You can use dodgy competitions as a cover story for as long as you like, the fact that people are leaving and distrusting the MSM in droves should be evidence enough of your failings for the public at large. |
http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=5565755
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cruise4
Validated Poster
Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 292
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes... everyone should complain about the biased news coverage on the war on terror farce and the sham of a program they made called 9/11: The Conspiracy Files. I have.
See this thread: http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=10379&highlight=
The Mainstream Media are Traitors and Guilty of Conspiracy to Mass Murder. This phone-in fiasco, why aren't the police investigating? Sounds like fraud to me! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wow I got a reply not that it says anything mind you! I wonder if anyone would have ideas to start a reply? My view of the BBC changed essentially after the handling of the Dr David Kelly affair.
| Quote: | Dear Mr Dawson
Thank you for your e-mail.
I understand you feel the BBC is biased in favour of the government. Whilst I appreciate your correspondence, you have not provided any evidence or examples to which you refer. If you can provide further details, I would be happy to be of further assistance.
Thank you again for taking the time to contact the BBC.
Regards
Adam Sims
BBC Information |
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You might, more appositely, use this:
| Quote: | By Mick Meaney
RINF Alternative News
BBC will ignore 9/11 hit piece for 9 months
Following on from recent communication between the BBC and a British physicist planning to sue the corporation for ‘mass public deception’, the BBC have responded by pushing back the complaint investigation procedure, buying themselves more time in the hope the issue will be forgotten about.
However, as the BBC are a global corporation reaching billions around the world and called on many leading 9/11 researchers to help make the programme, only to present a distorted view of their evidence, the global 9/11 truth movement is not letting the issue go.
The latest letter from the BBC states the Editorial Standards Committee (ESC) had been scheduled to look at this matter in detail during a meeting in September but due to “a large number of complaints”, they expect the issue to be pushed back to a meeting on the 2nd October, almost a full 9 months after originally being aired on BBC2.
There is a current tidal-wave of complaints at the BBC and mounting pressure for the corporation to revise its editorial practices as serious breaches were found in many of its programmes.
Public trust in the BBC has fallen and while the mainstream media are ignoring 9/11 evidence for the moment, the 9/1 truth movement is gathering momentum at an astonishing rate, that will ensure the issue will not be dropped.
One of the scientists who appeared in the programme, and founder of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth group, Professor Jim Fetzer said to RINF: “Guy Smith and Kenneth Payne interviewed me for some eight hours but only used seven-and-a-half minutes on the air. I advanced dozens of arguments against the official account but they were highly selective and only presented perhaps one-and-a-half.
“It might be worthwhile to suggest the BBC review the footage and the process of selection that was employed, which would reveal that this was a “hit piece” intended to discredit students of 9/11 for holding views the government wants to suppress, not because they are false but politically threatening.
“The objective of the programme does not appear to have been to probe our reasons for rejecting the official account (on the basis of logic and evidence) but to provide an opportunity for others to appeal to their conception of psychology to explain why we need conspiracy theories as security blankets to make us more comfortable with the situation that we encountered on 9/11. How anyone finds comfort from the realization our own government has been killing our fellow citizens was never made clear. Indeed, the basic premise of this special verges on absurdity!” he said.
Many methods of action are being taken to expose the BBC, with some gaining a lot of success such as the recent ‘9/11 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy’, a rebuttal documentary receiving around half a million views on Google Video since being released only weeks ago. |
_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
