View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
karlos Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 2516 Location: london
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:57 am Post subject: Bridge Collapse - failed false flag? |
|
|
As you probably heard a bridge in minneapolis has collapsed. The eye witnesses say there was work on the bridge during the last few days which involved the drilling of holes.
Possibly they were planning to place charges and carry out a false flag in the next few days.
They must have weakened the bridge too much.
THen again it may just be an accident
but you know how sceptical one treats everything the BBC says.
Bridge falls into Mississippi River
By PATRICK CONDON Associated Press Writer
© 2007 The Associated Press
MINNEAPOLIS — An interstate bridge suddenly broke into huge sections and collapsed into the Mississippi River during bumper-to-bumper traffic Wednesday, killing at least six people and sending vehicles, tons of concrete and twisted metal crashing into the water.
The Interstate 35W bridge, a major link between Minneapolis and St. Paul, was in the midst of being repaired when it collapsed.
"There were two lanes of traffic, bumper to bumper, at the point of the collapse. Those cars did go into the river," Minneapolis Police Lt. Amelia Huffman. "At this point there is nothing to suggest that this was anything other than a structural collapse."
Jamie Winegar of Houston said she was sitting in traffic when all of a sudden she started hearing "boom, boom, boom and we were just dropping, dropping, dropping, dropping."
The car she was riding in landed on top of a smaller car but did not fall into the water. She said her nephew yelled, "'It's an earthquake!' and then we realized the bridge was collapsing."
Mayor R.T. Rybak said at least six people were killed. There were no immediate reports on the total number of injured, but Dr. Joseph Clinton, emergency medical chief at Hennepin County Medical Center, said the hospital treated 28 injured people — including six who were in critical condition.
Other hospitals also were treating the injured. Clinton said at least one of the victims had drowned.
The arched bridge, which was built in 1967, rises about 64 feet above the river. An estimated 50 vehicles plunged into the water and onto the land below, the Star-Tribune reported.
A burning truck and a school bus clung to one slanted slab. The bus had just crossed the bridge before it crumpled into pieces, and broadcast reports indicated the children on the bus exited out the back door.
Christine Swift's 10-year-old daughter, Kaleigh, was on the bus, returning from a field trip to Bunker Hills in suburban Blaine. She said her daughter called her about 6:10 p.m.
"She was screaming, 'The bridge collapsed,'" Swift said.
She said a police officer told her all the kids got off the bus safely.
Dozens of vehicles were scattered and stacked on top of each other amid the rubble. Some people were stranded on parts of the bridge that aren't completely in the water.
Melissa Hughes, 32, of Minneapolis said she was driving home across the bridge when she went down when the western edge in the collapse.
"You know that free fall feeling? I felt that twice," said Hughes, who was not injured.
A pickup ended up on top of her car, partially crushing the top and back end.
"I had no idea there was a vehicle on my car," she said. "It's really very surreal."
Many motorist could have been headed to the Minnesota Twins game scheduled not far from the bridge, but the game was postponed, team president Dave St. Peter said.
Ramon Houge told the St. Paul Pioneer Press that he was on his way home from work on the bridge when he heard a rumbling noise, saw the ground collapse and cars go down.
Traffic was bumper to bumper and hundreds of people would have been involved, he said. He said cars backed up as best they could and he parked in a construction zone and was finally able to turn around and drive off the bridge. "It didn't seem like it was real," he said.
Local television stations captured video of injured people being carried up the riverbank. There was no official word on injuries, but dozens of rescue vehicles were there. Divers were also in the water.
Workers have been repairing the 40-year-old bridge's surface as part of improvements along that stretch of the interstate, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported on its Web site.
Homeland Security Department spokesman Russ Knocke also said the collapse did not appear to be terrorism-related. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
festival of snickers Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 733 Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
festival of snickers Validated Poster
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 733 Location: the worlds greatest leper colony usa
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
karlos Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 2516 Location: london
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The fact is local residents claimed that the bridge was being serviced but everyone said that workmen had been drilling holes into the bridge exposing and weakening it.
This is unheard of that workers would deliberately weaken a bridge. But it may have been a prelude to prepositioning explosives like demolition charges which are generally planted into holes.
Either way it was no accident. Either constructive homicide or negligent homicide. On the grounds that only a fool will drill deep holes into a bridge. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mediadisbeliever Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 128 Location: North Humberside
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Stelios writes: Quote: | The eye witnesses say there was work on the bridge during the last few days which involved the drilling of holes.
Possibly they were planning to place charges and carry out a false flag in the next few days.
They must have weakened the bridge too much.
|
Agreed Stelios...I also see this as suspect. Why on earth would maintenance bridge workers drill holes in it to sustain the life of the bridge? I know these things are not always clear cut, but qualified structural engineers must surely have been on the scene to supervise the work.
If this was indeed a botched false flag op, then what is the significance of this bridge to them and why choose a Minneapolis bridge as the target? Would they have chosen this bridge because they knew that there was long overdue structual work needed doing in order that the public could pin the blame on bad maintenance instead? Just a thought.
I have just read on Yahoo News http://news.yahoo.com
First alarm about bridge raised in 1990.
Covering tracks at all! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karlos Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 2516 Location: london
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually i realised what this is all about now.
Bloomberg tv the financial channel just stated that may similar bridges may also have structural design flaws. To repair these bridges of which there are 70,000 in the USA will cost over $180,000,000,000. $180 Billion.
So looks like another jackpot day for Haliburton and Bechtel.
Weaken one bridge by drilling a few holes into it.
Kill some people.
Win a MASSIVE contract.
Cheney and the NWO boys are laughing all the way to the bank again. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gareth Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was interesting that there just happened to be a school bus involved.
BBC News 24 just said all similar bridges in the UK will undergo safety reviews _________________ www.truthaction.org/forum
www.wearechange.org.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I35W bridge "collapses" on 1.8.7 the 30th week and 3rd day of the year.
3 months and 3 days after the gas tanker crash that caused the Oakland Bay Bridge Overpass known as MacArthur Maze to "collapse" on 29.4.7
Also, 1 month and 19 days after the Vietnam Veterans Boulevard "incident" involving, yet another gas tanker on 13.6.2007 _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gareth Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 398
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
insidejob Validated Poster
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
|
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:57 am Post subject: Bridge collapse theory |
|
|
http://estrecho.indymedia.org/newswire/display/69765/index.php
A DAWNING DICTATORSHIP? (911-2B & NSPD-51)
Usuario Anónimo
Date Created: 05 ago 2007
This work is in the public domain
Captain Eric H. May posts an update to his breaking story on the 911-2B Scenario.
A Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51)
By Captain Eric H. May
Military Correspondent
A Piecemeal Prologue
Half of the American people believe that the Bush administration is on the hunt for Al-Qaeda for the 9/11 attacks. Another half believe that 9/11 was a Bush administration inside job, attributable not to Al-Qaeda, but to "Al-CIA-duh." Both halves, though, agree on one thing, and aren't shy about saying it: This summer we are likely to suffer another terror attack, a "911-2B."
The list of notables' quotables begins with the springtime warning of the vice president to NBC's Tim Russert on Meet the Press:
April 15, 2007, Dick Cheney: "The greatest threat now is 'a 9/11' occurring ... with a nuclear weapon in the middle of one of our own cities."
June 3, 2007, Dennis Milligan, Chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party: “I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]."
July 1, 2007, ABC News: “A secret U.S. law enforcement report, prepared for the Department of Homeland Security, warns that al Qaeda is planning a terror "spectacular" this summer."
July 11, 2007, Michael Chertoff, Homeland Security chief: "I believe we are entering a period this summer of increased risk."
July 20, 2007, Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury: "Whether authentic or orchestrated, an attack will activate Bush's new executive orders [NSPD-51], which create a dictatorial police state in event of national emergency."
July 24, 2007, Peter DeFazio, House Homeland Security Committee member: “I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attack … Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right.”
A Recess Review
As Congress goes home for August, opinion polls show that roughly two out of three American citizens either dislike or detest George W. Bush, and things are rapidly falling apart for him. More and more White House officials are invoking executive privilege to avoid answering the hard questions of an exasperated legislative branch about them and their "unitary executive." Alberto Gonzales is the object of a growing congressional impeachment movement, as is Dick Cheney -- and half of the public wants Bush impeached, too.
In the last two weeks the stock market has dropped by nearly a thousand points, and threatens a bearish mauling of the financial sector that has been the Bush administration's base and beneficiary.
His own Republicans are threatening to bail out on busted-down Iraq, unless they get strong reassurances from General David Petraeus in mid-September. The general's situation is hardly reassuring, though. Embattled Baghdad, which he was sent to secure, is currently under fire and without water, and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki is publicly calling for his removal.
Wednesday, August 1, could have been the worst day of all for the White House. In the morning came the news that the Iraqi government had fallen apart, with the Sunni faction quitting al-Maliki's cabinet. This disastrous development was likely to hold the headlines until the end of the week, when Congress would head home to discuss this latest war calamity with already war-weary constituents.
A Minnesota Miracle
Wednesday afternoon could have added even more woes to the White House. America's first and only Muslim congressman, Keith Ellison, appeared on CNN's Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer to discuss some scorching anti-Bush comments he had made on July 8 to constituents in Minneapolis, in which he had compared 9/11 to the Reich stag Fire, and George Bush to Adolph Hitler. In 1933 Hitler used the Reich stag Fire, carried out under his orders, to establish a dictatorship in Germany.
Ellison's analysis is accepted by most of the Muslim world, much of the non-Muslim world, and a growing minority of Americans. Rather than defend it, though, Ellison backed down with apologies in his interview with Blitzer, saying that his remarks were a "rookie mistake," never to be repeated.
Perhaps Ellison's retreat from his remarks was an attempt to stave off the disaster that frequently befalls those who disrupt the political paradigm. If so, it didn't work. Two hours after Ellison's mea culpa, his congressional district suffered a freak disaster with the collapse of the I-35 bridge into the Mississippi River.
One man's loss is another's gain, though. In the news, the collapse of the Minneapolis bridge supplanted the collapse of the al-Maliki government and the Bush White House for the rest of Wednesday..., then Thursday..., then Friday. By Saturday the congressman who had accused the unitary executive of treason was with Bush himself, taking a tour of his afflicted district, and begging for the relief of federal funds.
A Cowardly Congress
It's hard to fathom why the Democratic Congress would bow down to the unitary executive before skipping town for summer vacation, but that's just what they have done.
Last week Congress gave the White House the gift of expanded executive power by its approval of the 9/11 Commission's recommendations, further extending the reach of the unitary executive.
Friday, the Senate voted 60-28 in favor of granting Bush and Gonzales more power to conduct domestic surveillance without the trouble of a court warrant. The House followed suit Saturday, with a vote of 227-183.
A Dodging DeFazio
On the same day that the Minneapolis bridge fell into the Mississippi, the White House refused a written request by House Homeland Security chairman Bernie Thompson and Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio to read classified annexes of NSPD-51, the presidential order, announced in May, by which Bush can declare himself dictator in the event of a natural catastrophe like Katrina -- or a terror attack like 9/11-2B.
DeFazio's Oregon is the target of "Noble Resolve," an upcoming 9/11-2B military exercise scheduled for August 20-24 that includes a nuclear attack on Portland. Pacific North westerners are increasingly alarmed that they may be the targets of a false flag nuclear attack, or the fallout from it. You can't blame them. After all, according to all sources, left and right, 911-2B is the only thing that can revitalize the war president and the war plan.
Oregon's DeFazio is unfazed by it all, or pretends to be. Penny Dodge, his chief of staff, refuses to answer questions from media about his failure. DeFazio has taken to the Internet and airwaves to urge his constituents to relax -- despite his inability to examine NSPD-51, and his unwillingness to examine the possibility that they may be targets for a military exercise. He urges trust in the motives of the unitary executive. In doing so DeFazio fails in his duty, and acts the part of Bush's buffoon in a comedy of terrors.
# # #
Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public affairs officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer. His political and military analyses have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Houston Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine.
Related
http://www.ghosttroop.net |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Skeptic Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Mar 2006 Posts: 485
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|