More Popular Mechanics Bias

[Me]

As you can see, PM has a history of defending Bush no matter what the issue. all of the horror stories that we heard about Katrina were apparently lies as well according to PM. Is the mainstream media comprised of conspiracy theorist as well?

http://newsbusters.org/node/4313

Popular Mechanics Takes on Katrina Myths

Yet even more proof that PM is a shamefully biased propaganda outfit and anyone who uses them as a reference has no credibility. Their only concern is exonerating the Bush administration. Facts and reality are discarded along the way. Next PM will probably be telling us that the WMD’s really were in Iraq.

[Louise]

I guess that PM might be scared to disagree with the Bush administration perhaps, because they know that if they do nasty things might start happening to them.

You know it's like the school bully in the playground, you want to get on his/her side and be their friend because you sure don't want to be their enemy and thus a pontential target.

So it could be that or it could be that it has been deliberately set up to help cover up the US goverments actions.

I'm not sure which .

On another issue i understand that president bush had to go into hospitail recently leaving Dick Chaney in charge with the authority to start a nuclear war if he wanted.

This is very unwise and stupid to leave that kind of decision and authority in the hands of one man, very unwise indeed.

As a safeguard that kind of decision should be left in the hands of several people say about 3 or 4, and they all have to agree on something like that before it can happen.

I think it's wrong to leave it all in the hands of one man.

[Me]

[Louise]

Another thing is since we know that the US goverment, its associated organisations and the US Military does nothing but lie, lie, lie to not only the american people, but also the people of the world, it makes it even more dangerous and foolhardy to leave abilitys so huge that it could (and would) affect the whole of humanity in the hands of such practiced and acomplished decevers.

It's a shame they don't award certificates for lying, they would have a grade A masters by now.

Or maybe have lying as an oylimpic event, the US goverment would win gold every time i think.

I'm sure the US is such a lovely country with some nice people (i have never visited there myself), oh what a shame that it is run by such corrupt people.

[Me]

I'm a bit surprised. I posted this at 9/11 Blogger as 'Buru Dragon' and Prison Planet picked it up.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/10353

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/020807Popular.htm

[Louise]

PM is owned by the Hearst Corporation:

http://www.hearstcorp.com/index.html

The Hearst Corporation own many, many other media companys as well as can be seen on their site.

But who is above the Hearst Corporation?.

The US Goverment?.

Does the US goverment tell the Hearst Corporation what to print or broadcast then that gets passed on to all the companys it owns including PM?.

[Me]

[Me]

Here's a prime example of Fox News lies. I posted this at another forum.

[Louise]

I watched the following video posted by: Me two posts ago:

http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/64513/detail/

It was brilliant i thought.

These people that the video mentioned seriously need to be heavely and mercylessly interrogated using every methord possible to get the truth out of them, and interrogate them INDIVIDUALLY.

Because i'm sure that there is a lot more that they know about, that they are keeping secret.

Use lie detectors, truth drug, whatever it takes to truly find out what's really been happening and what they've been doing to the US and the US people.

I must admit when that guy said that they should all be put in jail my mental response was "more like put up against a wall and shot" (once we've got the truth out of them first of course).

It's about time people turned the tables on them for once.

I liked the bit where someone was hurling abuse at Dick Chaney and condalezza Rice.

I would suggest that no evidence that they say they have can be trusted anymore and it should all be subject to independant scrutiny.

What i'm wondering is, president bush is due to leave the white house in 2008 after serving two terms in office whitch i'm lead to belive is the maximum.

Is there ANYWAY he can fiddle or rig things so that he stays for longer than that by using his old friend fear on the US people?.

Would it need another big (or medium) false flag event to enable him to stay in office longer than he is supposed to?.

There must be some way around the ruling that he is only allowed to stay in office a maximum of two terms, by using terror or creating a crisis of some sort.

Or maybe using bribery?.

By the way if you want to send an email to tell bush and chaney what you think of them heres the addresses its:

comments@whitehouse.gov

For bush and:

vice_president@whitehouse.gov

For Chaney.