| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Easy Rider
Minor Poster
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 94
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
 Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 4:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
you would have to know the reasons for him not saying where he took it from before knowing it is because of a possible fake, of course we can guess why but that is'nt how truth works.
i agree though its puzzling why he cannot mention it and it raises questions. but the first question it raises to me is if 9/11 happened how we were told and there is no covering-up of information and evidence, why are people sworn to secrecy if there is nothing to hide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Easy Rider
Minor Poster
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well stating the obvious ...............it didn't happen as they say and they have got something to hide.
The guy could not say where he took the film because it was fake.
Why don't you call him yourself and ask him? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Killtown
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 438
Location: That Yankee country the U.S.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| marky 54 wrote: | | I agree though its puzzling why he cannot mention it and it raises questions. but the first question it raises to me is if 9/11 happened how we were told and there is no covering-up of information and evidence, why are people sworn to secrecy if there is nothing to hide. |
This is a very good question;
For example, I have signed the Official Secrets Act and there are a number of things I cannot discuss although there is nothing to 'hide' as such. I also understand that some contracts involving 'ownership' of rights expressly forbid any discussion whatsoever of detail. If you take a photo or video and I buy it for $XXX,XXX and I stipulate you say nothing about it, then that is the way it is.
Let's not forget that this is Thought Criminal NPT thread - so remain level headed when responding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Easy Rider wrote: | Well stating the obvious ...............it didn't happen as they say and they have got something to hide.
The guy could not say where he took the film because it was fake.
Why don't you call him yourself and ask him? |
if he aint gonna tell me why he was there or where he was, how can i come to the conclusion it was because it was fake? doing so is guessing and not truth.
its just a case of twisting things to suit your viewpoint, but i will give you another possibility.
what if the news channel had paid him to be there filming at that very moment and this is why he will not disclose any of the information? because it would expose foreknowledge to get good shots from so called "amatuers" as it would be more suspcious if news crews were all in postion at such an early stage into the attacks, hence he will not give any details away no matter how small, especially if hes suspicious its one of those 9/11 truthers on his back, and it could also be written in a contract that for all we know is on going for other work? but i don't know how working for news agencies works but its just a guess the same as its just a guess to say its because it had been faked.
he did'nt say his reasons for not disclosing the information and the tv fakery crew have just presumed its because it was fake footage and dismissed any other possibility even being possible.
im not stopping you presuming the reasons why, but the fact is untill he says why himself that is all people can do, presume. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Killtown
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 438
Location: That Yankee country the U.S.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 evidence of a location, after ALL this time!
if nist give the actual location then there can be no arguement as to where it was filmed from, maybe now you can go ferther to proving it was faked, understand that before you had this 'evidence' it was purely guess work and speculation as to where it was filmed from.
also no one is anti tv fakery, just anti speculation on ANY subject. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Killtown
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 438
Location: That Yankee country the U.S.
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| marky 54 wrote: | evidence of a location, after ALL this time!
if nist give the actual location then there can be no arguement as to where it was filmed from, maybe now you can go ferther to proving it was faked, understand that before you had this 'evidence' it was purely guess work and speculation as to where it was filmed from. |
Shots from the ground don't line up and the trees, in real life, are WAY too high. Didn't you see this explanation in our video?
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/08/filmer-of-accused-fake-wtc-video- wont.html
The only hope for that video is that it was taken from a boat docked up against the edge.
Face it, we've proved the video is a fraud. what more do you need?
_________________
killtown.blogspot.com - 911movement.org |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Thu Aug 09, 2007 7:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Killtown wrote: | | marky 54 wrote: | evidence of a location, after ALL this time!
if nist give the actual location then there can be no arguement as to where it was filmed from, maybe now you can go ferther to proving it was faked, understand that before you had this 'evidence' it was purely guess work and speculation as to where it was filmed from. |
Shots from the ground don't line up and the trees, in real life, are WAY too high. Didn't you see this explanation in our video?
http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/08/filmer-of-accused-fake-wtc-video- wont.html
The only hope for that video is that it was taken from a boat docked up against the edge.
Face it, we've proved the video is a fraud. what more do you need? |
yes ive seen that before, but that was when the location was guess work no matter how good the guessing was, i aint a new yorker so im uncertain of if the named location was the same location from previous videos. anyhow this seems confirmed as the same location as the previous videos so it don't really matter.
all i expect (of myself) is to be sure, 100% sure and as much as possible can be proven with evidence before i believe it.
if theres a possibility it could be something else then that needs to be explored not ignored. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
