View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's another story which might well make you mad Gareth,
Seriously though, the best lesson that can come out of your experience is that its a great national tabloid story and that we should let the world know about it.
Certainly worth telling your local paper's newsdesk at the bare minimum.
And call for a national boycott of First Recruitment.
Don't take it like a bi..., errr, I mean, lying down.
You are Spartacus!
Quote: |
Romping Police Inspector Cleared Of Misconduct
http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowStory.asp?story=RP1540898J&news_headline=romp ing_police_inspector_cleared_of_misconduct
The British Transport Police (BTP) inspector had met the woman on internet dating site www.uniformdating.com, where he used the name Michael K Plod and arranged to meet her the next day when he would have been on duty.
Khan claimed he thought that at the time of the arranged tryst, at three o'clock on July 23 last year, another inspector would have been on duty to relieve him from the job of covering south east London.
This was not the case and Khan admitted he went ahead regardless, saying: "It was absolutely the wrong thing to do morally and professionally. I should have never have done it."
Khan drove to Gatwick airport in a marked police car, wearing his uniform and met the woman. They then went to a "grubby" and "unspectacular" police room at the end of one of the platforms at the airport train station........ |
_________________ www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org
www.rethink911.org
www.patriotsquestion911.com
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.v911t.org
www.thisweek.org.uk
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.elementary.org.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/contributor/2149
http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
https://37.220.108.147/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gareth Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 398
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Despite Tele's comments further up the thread, I think a publicised boycott of the agency may be worthwhile.
I would personally like to know which companies had discriminated against 911 researchers and as much about the circumstances as those involved were prepared to give.
That way I'm alerted to their prejudice.
After all, employers used recruitment agencies as well as people looking for work. 911 people are everywhere you know?
How about a separate forum area for people to post their experiences? Would the IP of the poster give sufficient legal protection to the forum owner? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Busker wrote: | Despite Tele's comments further up the thread, I think a publicised boycott of the agency may be worthwhile.
After all, employers used recruitment agencies as well as people looking for work. 911 people are everywhere you know? |
Without wishing to open more cans of worms - this whole thing started because a company used an agency. It is therefore more than accepted that employers approach agencies for staff, that is how it works. In other words, such agencies only exist because they have vacancies on their books supplied by employers. This is a given and hardly a revelation.
As for the agency in question, it is very localised with a handful of branches. I question who exactly would benefit from a boycott? Easiest option, simply email them and outline the position stating that everyone connected with 911 Truth is refusing to have anything to do with them as a business - either as employer or potential employee.
I reiterate points that no-one has addressed;
This is not exactly my view, but I can shift perspective and see things thus;
The agency in question would only have found out about Gareth's 911 debate via the employer. This can only have taken the form of a complaint, so are we saying that the agency was wrong to act upon a complaint from an employer of that size given the work that they give the agency? Look at it from the position of the agency, it is a business not a charity.
As I said before, a blanket 911 boycott of the agency is meaningless. Every truther would need to know and be in a position to pull a damaging contract and be in the right location geographically speaking.
Another point is that the decision to axe Gareth wouldn't have been made by everyone in the agency, just some manager. Suppose they lose contracts as a result of a boycott - branches close and people lose their jobs - do any truthers work for the agency, how many rely on the job to survive and pay their mortgages? This is just some tinpot job club where regular folk work, you aren't out to bring down the Bush administration! Don't hold the entire organisation to blame for the actions of one branch manager.
Was Gareth given any warning to stop talking about 911 by the employer on-site? Was he merely overheard and nothing said to him at the time? What do his terms & conditions state as this is the pivotal and most important aspect of the whole affair - even a temp will have to conform to certain internal rules and regs, so what are they exactly?
In conclusion and by far the most dichotomous of points - many members of this forum have been banned for things they typed. This forum has a set of rules, break them and you are gone, in fact I was banned for nothing more terrible than being sarcastic. People are compromised by the silliest word, sign or phrase - it happens here, it happened to Gareth in the workplace. This forum is NO different to the agency whatsoever. That is not a criticism, that is a fact.
We are all assuming far too much based upon the flimsiest of detail, and everyone is up in arms about let's storm the castle and start removing the evil baron's head. I support any legitimate and justified action, but this is all knee-jerk in the extreme. We need more detail and a better perspective before wielding axes and turning into a baying lynch mob. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Louise Validated Poster
Joined: 19 Apr 2007 Posts: 280
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think its absoluely digusting what happened to gareth.
I have every sympathy for him.
Whatever action he decides to take i wish him all the very best of luck.
Why should he be punished just for talking about his views on 9/11.
Why are some people frightend to talk or have people talk about the subject?.
Why should the real muderers of 9/11 get away with it just because of the position that they hold?.
I back you all the way gareth, as i'm sure most if not all the other people on this forum do (well except the critics i suppose maybe). _________________ One sure way for evil to prevail, is for the good to do nothing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andyb Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1025 Location: SW London
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For my sins I used to be a recruitment consultant. The agency would not have pulled him out of the job unless asked to by the employer and replaced by somebody else. The agency are serving the employer and the customert is always right, especially if you want repeat business. I don't think boycotting the agency will achive anything. Pursuing the matter as a form of discrimination and trying to get some local publicity is all that would happen but then Gareth's name would be out there as a problem temp and he'd find it difficult to secure more temp work.
A better course of action would be to find out the manager involved and writing him an email, with no abuse or speculation!!, letting him know a few things. I think thuogh that Gareth should be able to decide what letters get sent, so I would suggest PM'ing him first. Failing that a little demo outside the workplace would certainly wake up a few of their other employees _________________ "We will have to repent in this generation not merely for the vitriolic words and actions of the bad people, but for the appalling silence of the good people.” Martin Luther King |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | As I said before, a blanket 911 boycott of the agency is meaningless. Every truther would need to know and be in a position to pull a damaging contract and be in the right location geographically speaking. |
Once again we find ourselves disagreeing Tele.
By your reasoning the Fairtrade movement would not exist, Barclays would have continue to trade with the apartheid regime in South Africa unchallenged. You would be quite happy for Cat to supply the military regime in Israel still?
You appear to make the assumption that all 911 people are on the temp work side of the supply chain. As an employer I would not deal with companies who suppress 911 in such a way as described on the forum. I may be alone in that, due to my personal thoughts and beliefs, but I wouldn't have them in my supply chain. There are plenty of other agencies around if required.
If you want to influence businesses, you influence their income streams. It's as easy as that. There's far too much hand wringing and not enough action going on. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[quote="telecasterisationAs I said before, a blanket 911 boycott of the agency is meaningless. [/quote]
So by your reasoning the Fairtrade movement of companies would not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
The Fairtrade Movement? What does this have to do Gareth's very specific set of circumstances?
Why does everything have to get blown out of all proportion, this is now just like all the daft debates on smoking, the internal combustion engine getting dragged in when the comparison card is automatically played. You play the 'orange and banana' card to make convoluted analogy?
Incidentally and more importantly, why is Cilla Black no longer on our television screens? She is an institution and should be nurtured, don't you agree?
Last edited by telecasterisation on Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kc Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quick question: How many of those planning to boycott said recruitment agency are in a position to ever use one? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | The Fairtrade Movement? What does this have to do Gareth's very specific set of circumstances? |
It's got everything to do with a boycott you said would be meaningless.
Ok, I'll spell it out for you since you need it.
People weren't happy buying goods because of what they saw in the supply chain. c.f. sacking due to "inappropriate discussions", so they established a network of suppliers where they were happy with the supply chain.
As someone who has, and probably will be involved with agencies on both sides of the supply I would prefer to know about this sort of thing, so I can make commercially viable decisions avoiding companies like this.
If you're happy standing in the rain shout "9/11 was an inside job" well maybe that works for you. Most folks just write that approach off as nutters.
Start affecting revenue streams, citing their approach to 9/11 issues and they may, just may, think twice.
It's why politicians in the USA court the Christian Right, or why certain companies are gay friendly pursuing the "Pink Pound".
No doubt you'll come back at me with another hysterical rant. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Busker wrote: | Start affecting revenue streams, citing their approach to 9/11 issues and they may, just may, think twice. |
Think twice? About what, responding to complaining clients? They didn't respond to a 911 issue - they responded because a client complained about someone they sent along to fill a position. It has nothing to do with 911, the agency merely met the requirements of the employer who was upset.
I find you ignore poor Cilla as being the height of contentiousness. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm curious as to what advice you would give one of your children in a similar position Tele ? _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mark Gobell wrote: | I'm curious as to what advice you would give one of your children in a similar position Tele ? |
Excellent question.
I'd say go and beg for the job back, cite all the great things you'd done, when you think just how many series of Blind Date there were. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking parental advice before the event.
As in:
Ok <child> keep your mouth shut and just buckle down.
or
Ok <child> stand up for what you believe in.
Or
Anywhere in between, just in case you need a don't know option. _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The first thing I would do is say 'Sit there and tell exactly what happened, don't leave anything out?'. This is because, so far we have got;
Quote: | I'm not going into the specifics on a public forum. |
You can appreciate that this limits the advice I could offer, Because of the life I have led, it has meant a very high degree of focus based upon precise detail and testimony. With this in mind, I would also add that I'd need to know what Gareth's intended outcome would be?
Are we pursuing revenge of some sort, are we after promoting and spreading 911'y type information to the masses?
Does he want his job back or monetary reimbursement, an apology even?
I genuinely have no clue what Gareth wants or expects, is the CAB visit a cosmetic move designed to 'go through the motions'?
Everyone appears to have spotted an opportunity to get '911 Conspiracy Theorist Ousted From Job' - into print, which is cool, but I am fairly certain that Gareth hasn't got that at the top of his wish list. If I am wrong, then it is up to Gareth/one of my kids to stump up their demands and let me know.
I did originally tell him earlier in the thread to get the agency to let him have the reasons he was dismissed in writing, forget 'taping' conversations - headed notepaper with a signature is the only way forward. Without something in writing - it ends there.
I know how you view my opinions as 'fence-sitting', but I'd need to know a lot more before offering direction. It's all too vague. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eckyboy Validated Poster
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 5:16 pm Post subject: Come on Ecky! bore us with your tales of woe! |
|
|
I will never register with an agency again after what happened to me back when I worked for a big company back in 2005. I was getting 100% quality assurance in my calls in regards to dealing with customers and yet because I missed my sales target by one I was sacked. The sales targets were originally 5 a month but one day they shot upto 25 sales a month. I never had a problem with sales up until the point I was told to actively miss sell to customers and tell them anything to get them to sign up. When I complained about this I was told I was being negative and would not be offered a long term contract if I continued with this attitude. I explained that this is not good customer service and is against not only my principles but also the very mission statement that this company uses! I was the only one in my team who was not given a contract despite the fact I had the most sales upto that point and was the only one in my team who had perfect quality assurance for the past two months at this moment in time. When I was sacked they actually waited until I went home and then on the next day on my day off they phoned me to tell me I was being sacked. They then proceeded to empty the contents of my locker and binned all my items. I actually later complained that my birth certificate had been in the locker and because I knew my manager was an imbecile she would not have checked when she binned my stuff. Destroying a birth certificate is against the law and when I pointed this out my ex manager promised to provide me with an excellent reference which I dully received. The agency responsible for all this was BLUE ARROW. They were easily the most useless recruitment agency I have ever had the misfortune to be associated with and I could go on and on with even more stories about their lack of professionalism but I do not want to bore everyone to tears.
What does all this have to do with 911? nothing but it is another example of the moronic society we live in where being honest and having integrity are deemed as negatives. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | Think twice? About what, responding to complaining clients? They didn't respond to a 911 issue - they responded because a client complained about someone they sent along to fill a position. It has nothing to do with 911, the agency merely met the requirements of the employer who was upset. |
Didn't Gareth mention he was told by the agency discussing 9/11 issues at the workplace was "inappropriate"?
That makes it a 9/11 issue.
Do pay attention Tele. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Busker wrote: | Didn't Gareth mention he was told by the agency discussing 9/11 issues at the workplace was "inappropriate"?
Do pay attention Tele. |
No, Gareth never said anything about 'inappropriate', the expression used was 'unacceptable'.
Me pay attention? Nah.
(Cuts large slice of humble pie, hands it across on a nice flowery plate together with a napkin to The Buskmeister). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gareth Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Be at peace tele. I am awaiting the 'official' reason in writing and taking that to the Bureau.
Someone as yet unknown to me who sat in my vicinity had a problem with what was heard.
The matter is perhaps complicated further by the fact that my own calm and considered conversation later inspired two further people to start their own with one of them racially abusing the other.
Maybe not though. It was something i was supposed to have said.
Could be when i mentioned:
- the evidence of controlled demolition, free fall speed, horizontal projections
- NIST only investigating the buildings until they were 'poised to collapse'.
- Gladio and the strategy of tension in Europe
All that was said by me lasted a couple of minutes. The person i initially talked to was lazing and reading a paper. He'd trained me all that week and i'd picked up his job in a day so we were in a situation where we could shoot the breeze. They're not going to be able to say i should have been working. There was no work. We'd had nothing to do for an hour!
The agency twice told me my opinion and the content of what i'd said regarding 911 was unacceptable so i'll be sure to let you know how they elaborate on that. To me that's not proper justification for ending my (temp) employment.
Kinda feels like i've been stuck in the racist/pervert/homophobe/cannibal category.
And no i wouldn't go back. I'm in different place now. I fancy some of that charity sector temp action. _________________ www.truthaction.org/forum
www.wearechange.org.uk |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: |
No, Gareth never said anything about 'inappropriate', the expression used was 'unacceptable'.
Me pay attention? Nah.
(Cuts large slice of humble pie, hands it across on a nice flowery plate together with a napkin to The Buskmeister). |
So is that you conceding it is a 9/11 issue then Tele
(Politely slides plate back onto Tele's side of the table) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Busker wrote: | telecasterisation wrote: |
No, Gareth never said anything about 'inappropriate', the expression used was 'unacceptable'.
Me pay attention? Nah.
(Cuts large slice of humble pie, hands it across on a nice flowery plate together with a napkin to The Buskmeister). |
So is that you conceding it is a 9/11 issue then Tele
(Politely slides plate back onto Tele's side of the table) |
Nice sidestep of your faux pas, however, I'll plonk the plate in the dishwasher as you returned it empty. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Long Tooth Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 306
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
My local CAB gets 75% of its annual funding from the local council/government. It raises the other 25% itself.
Now whether this is the same nationally i do not know.
So, will an organisation that gets 75% of its annual budget from local government/council, be willing to genuinely fight your corner on 'delicate' government/local government/local council matters?
The window dressing of the citizens advice bureau, likes to PR its fight for fairness for citizens, the reality is, anything too contraversial against local councils/government will see its budget erased and its employees dismissed. ( those in charge at the local CAB's do recive a wage, its only the lackie foot soldiers who volunteer their services free of charge) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Long Tooth wrote: | My local CAB gets 75% of its annual funding from the local council/government. It raises the other 25% itself.
So, will an organisation that gets 75% of its annual budget from local government/council, be willing to genuinely fight your corner on 'delicate' government/local government/local council matters? |
Do you see a high st job agency firing a temp as a 'delicate government/local government/local council matter'? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Long Tooth Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Apr 2007 Posts: 306
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | Long Tooth wrote: | My local CAB gets 75% of its annual funding from the local council/government. It raises the other 25% itself.
So, will an organisation that gets 75% of its annual budget from local government/council, be willing to genuinely fight your corner on 'delicate' government/local government/local council matters? |
Do you see a high st job agency firing a temp as a 'delicate government/local government/local council matter'? |
No, i see gareth considering/being advised by forum members to go to the CAB as a complete waste of time and effort. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
telecasterisation wrote: | Nice sidestep of your faux pas, however, I'll plonk the plate in the dishwasher as you returned it empty. |
On the contrary, you are still dodging the issue where you stated it wasn't 9/11 related when clearly it is.
Inappropriate, not the term used by Gareth but certainly synonimous, so the plate was definately returned as received.
Go on, admit it is 9/11 related Tele, it won't stick in your throat too much. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TonyGosling wrote:
Quote: | butt out
IMHO you should be given a warning for disrupting and trivialising this thread. |
Let me get this straight, is this a warning or just your opinion that I should have one? You will appreciate that your post is neither one thing nor the other and leaves much to guesswork. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 6342
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think you have given Tele a headache I notice the sqashed face
Maybe you should delete the Ex-Teles so that maybe the thread goes back to normal size? _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|