It's very good, but it's not the final version. The Truth Goes Marching On! _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Really good, keeps the attention from start to finish. excellent work. some of the music in the middle section was a little distracting from what the speakers were saying, perhaps the level could be knocked down a little?
Joined: 16 Feb 2006 Posts: 377 Location: North West UK
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2007 8:18 pm Post subject:
mark_e wrote:
some of the music in the middle section was a little distracting from what the speakers were saying, perhaps the level could be knocked down a little?
Noted for the next release, cheers.
TonyGosling wrote:
I keep trying 'keepvid.com' without success.
I download with Keepvid and Orbit (http://www.orbitdownloader.com/) save as a .flv file, then use SUPER (http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html) to convert to avi or mpeg
I'll give Adrian a copy of the pre-rendered file with all the clips, I'll do a copy for you aswell.. the more input we have from, well, pretty much anyone who is interested, the better it will be. Also got some rare footage of Henri Paul showing him as sober as a judge on the night which I didn't have time to include in this edit. _________________ RINF Alternative News and Media Anti-Slavery International Movement for the Abolition of War SchNews
Action speaks louder than..
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 am Post subject:
Still won't download
any clues anyone?
Google Video and keepvid has stopped letting me download anything
help, help, has anyone a solution to this?.
We can look at films but not save them?
Like Real Obnoxious Player all over again......
Mick Meaney wrote:
I download with Keepvid and Orbit (http://www.orbitdownloader.com/) save as a .flv file, then use SUPER (http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html) to convert to avi or mpeg
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:28 pm Post subject:
Medics could have saved Diana, inquest told
Professor Thomas Treasure, a leading British surgeon, said a "window of opportunity" may have existed to get the Princess to hospital half an hour before she was taken there.
He said that medics had done "very substantial good" in the initial period after the accident but that once Diana was in the ambulance time began "slipping away".
Although the combination Diana's injuries following her high-speed crash in the Pont d'Alma were extremely rare and serious, Prof Treasure said it was theoretically possible that she might have been saved.
The court heard of a discrepancy between the French approach to multiple-injury patients - which favours treatment at the scene - and the "scoop and run" approach taken in the UK.
Diana was freed from the wreckage of her Mercedes at 1am on August 31 1997, within 35 minutes of the crash.
But it was not until 1.40am that she was judged sufficiently stable to be taken to the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital across Paris, having suffered an apparent cardiac arrest which French doctors said necessitated an immediate heart massage and the application of a ventilation tube.
The ambulance was also ordered to drive slowly so as not to further destabilise the Princess en route.
advertisement
On one occasion, just metres from the hospital, the vehicle had to stop for around five minutes while treatment was administrated when Diana's blood pressure dropped perilously low, the jury heard.
A series of senior French doctors told the inquest that had Diana not been given such intense treatment on the way she would arrived at the hospital dead.
Doctors finally gave up the battle at 4am after extensive emergency surgery to stem massive internal bleeding on the right side of her chest.
But Prof Treasure questioned the treatment given to Diana and the decision to stop so close to the hospital rather than speed up.
He said: "They had done some very substantial good relatively quickly - stabilising the neck, getting her out of the car with just a brief episode when they lost the pulse, they got things going again and produced a normal blood pressure."
"Whether within a minute of hospital you put your foot on the accelerator or put your foot on the brake is also open to debate," he said.
Prof Treasure, a former president of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, added: "They had done a lot of good in that first half hour but from there, [but] the next big amount of good that could be done required a surgeon."
Counsel to the inquest Nicholas Hilliard asked: "Is it your view that part of that time, the essential period, was squandered?"
He replied: "It's a hard word, isn't it, but I think opportunities were lost."
He went on: "At the point at which she was in the ambulance and that initial assessment had been done pretty accurately and the neck was stabilised and the circulation ... I'm not quite sure what happened after that, that they didn't have her in hospital rather sooner."
He added: "When I pick through this with the benefit of hindsight (and ask) 'was this recoverable?' the answer is 'Yes, it just about was'."
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 137 Location: southend essex
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject:
Good video, I must admit I haven't really thought about this before. I still don't really see much of a motive for killing her-them. But interesting stuff. Nice to see it in court were evidence can be presented.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:19 am Post subject:
Motive is crystal clear to me - she was about to become the princess of Anglo-Muslim relations with the press access to stop the NWO plan to demonise Islam in its tracks........
THE AMBULANCE OF DEATH
paulsouthend wrote:
Good video, I must admit I haven't really thought about this before. I still don't really see much of a motive for killing her-them. But interesting stuff. Nice to see it in court were evidence can be presented.
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 137 Location: southend essex
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:10 pm Post subject:
Killed on who's say so, prince Philip? Not hard for me to believe the royals are evil people. If evidence points to a royal can they be charged and face court? I think it was more of a personal hate of Dianna by Philip and Liz. And not so much a NWO plot. princess of Anglo-Muslim relations, maybe Muslim seems to be a race these days. If one is so shallow. no offense intended
Quite why I ended up reading it I'll never know but.
The Daily Express ran a story on, I think the 30th August 1997, it was a Saturday I remember that, could have been the previous Saturday.
The gist of it was that Prince Phillip was on his way to a meeting at Balmoral with advisers to discuss, and I remember this distinctly, "the impending constitutional crisis" about Diana marrying Dodi. _________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Killed on who's say so, prince Philip? Not hard for me to believe the royals are evil people. If evidence points to a royal can they be charged and face court? I think it was more of a personal hate of Dianna by Philip and Liz. And not so much a NWO plot. princess of Anglo-Muslim relations, maybe Muslim seems to be a race these days. If one is so shallow. no offense intended
Think about what has happened since Diana was killed.
War has been declared on all muslims worldwide.
If Diana as is claimed was to have married Dodi, if Diana had become a Muslim as her best friend Jemima has done and she was indeed about to have a child with a Muslim father, then surely the war against Muslims would have been so much harder to sell to the public.
That is ultimately the reason she was killed. Whether by the Jesuits, MI5, CIA, whoever. I dont think the Royal family would be involved, she was after all no longer part of it. It is the court of public opinion. Daina was the most famous and popular woman in the world. When she announces that she is Muslim 'friendly' shall we say, millions worldwide would follow her example.
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 137 Location: southend essex
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject:
Its possible kinda makes sense what you saying, Islam is not a bad religion, but there doesn't seem to be many people talking about its good points. Dianna could have done that and some people would have listened.
"This particular phase of my life is the most dangerous - my husband is planning 'an accident' in my car, brake failure & serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry."
antiaristo
Just remember what it was she wrote to Paul Burrell just ten months before this happened.
Quote:
"As doctors battled to save her life, Diana - who was described as "comprehensible yet incoherent" - tore out a drip inserted into her arm.
It was then that doctors took the decision to inject her with a drug in an effort to "reduce the agitation".
Today, Professor Andre Lienhart, who inquired into Diana's treatment for a French investigating magistrate, backed Dr Martino's account.
Speaking via video link from Paris, Prof Lienhart said: "That's true. Due to the agitation, the first line, the first drip was removed."
He added: "[Diana] was agitated, she refused treatment ... [Dr Martino] decided to inject some drugs to reduce the agitation, for her to accept treatment."
What I'm seeing is a woman far from death, doing everything she could to defend herself. She was "thrashing her arms around". She "quickly pulled [the drip] out" after her arm "was held by force". She was "shouting and saying things in English which were comprehensible yet incoherent".
In fact she was so strong she was drugged. And after that needle was put into her arm she never again woke up.
They spent nearly two hours getting her to a hospital, and bypassed several closer hospitals en route.
It's pretty obvious she was murdered inside the ambulance.
And I think we can now formally dispense with the theory that Dodi was the real target.
SHE was the target, as she rightly foresaw.
"..in order to make the path clear for him to marry".
[/b]
But there was nothing stopping Charles from marrying Camila
Andrew is divorced, Anne, Margarette, and dozens of minor Royals.
Charles was divorced he could marry without any problem.
As could Diana.
I think pointing fingers at the Royals is wrong. Some people love them some hate them and those prejudices make people blame them. The Royals have not waged wars for quite some time.
Like 911 and 7/7 it would be interesting to hear more about the ambulance crew. who are they and where have they gone since then and why were they the ones who came.
If it is the case that their delays and their negligence finally led to Diana's death then they must be looked into properly.
The crash occured but clearly she was still alive and kicking so the ambulance crew made sure that she died.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 12:15 am Post subject:
karlos wrote:
But there was nothing stopping Charles from marrying Camila
Andrew is divorced, Anne, Margarette, and dozens of minor Royals.
Charles was divorced he could marry without any problem.
As could Diana.
I think pointing fingers at the Royals is wrong. Some people love them some hate them and those prejudices make people blame them. The Royals have not waged wars for quite some time.
Like 911 and 7/7 it would be interesting to hear more about the ambulance crew. who are they and where have they gone since then and why were they the ones who came.
If it is the case that their delays and their negligence finally led to Diana's death then they must be looked into properly.
The crash occured but clearly she was still alive and kicking so the ambulance crew made sure that she died.
If you read 'Jack the Ripper - The Final Solution' by Stephen Knight you will understand that the Royal Family does not need to 'do' anything - it gets done for them. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Killed on who's say so, prince Philip? Not hard for me to believe the royals are evil people. If evidence points to a royal can they be charged and face court? I think it was more of a personal hate of Dianna by Philip and Liz. And not so much a NWO plot. princess of Anglo-Muslim relations, maybe Muslim seems to be a race these days. If one is so shallow. no offense intended
Think about what has happened since Diana was killed.
War has been declared on all muslims worldwide.
If Diana as is claimed was to have married Dodi, if Diana had become a Muslim as her best friend Jemima has done and she was indeed about to have a child with a Muslim father, then surely the war against Muslims would have been so much harder to sell to the public.
That is ultimately the reason she was killed. Whether by the Jesuits, MI5, CIA, whoever. I dont think the Royal family would be involved, she was after all no longer part of it. It is the court of public opinion. Daina was the most famous and popular woman in the world. When she announces that she is Muslim 'friendly' shall we say, millions worldwide would follow her example.
Ashkenazi MOSSAD is my bet. Kelly also.
Levy was Blair's kingmaker they had Smith killed to make way. Robin Cook also - honey trapped _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: Ambulance
How long did it take exactly for the ambulance to leave the crash scene and arrive at the hospital? My sister-in-law is a French nurse. She told me several years ago that French ambulances are very well equipped and have most of the necessary medical care that a hospital can provide, hence there wouldn't have been the hurry to get to a hospital like in the UK. Therefore the crew that took her were probably taking her to the hospital most appropriate for her injuries.
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 8:47 pm Post subject: Re: Ambulance
jcr911truth wrote:
How long did it take exactly for the ambulance to leave the crash scene and arrive at the hospital? My sister-in-law is a French nurse. She told me several years ago that French ambulances are very well equipped and have most of the necessary medical care that a hospital can provide, hence there wouldn't have been the hurry to get to a hospital like in the UK. Therefore the crew that took her were probably taking her to the hospital most appropriate for her injuries.
Given the other French prevarications and stonewalling (all the cameras on Diana's route were said not to have been working, yet a French woman got a speeding ticket from a camera minutes before Diana's car entered the tunnel; they refused to give names and causes of death of other corpses in tthe morgue where Henri Paul's body was kept; they failed to find the Fiat Uno, yet investigative journalists had no problem finding out that a papparazi who had been on Dodi's yacht weeks before had one identical; her body was embalmed before autopsy (I think) which made it impossible to prove if she was pregnant or not); crime scene cleaned up with undue haste, etc etc, then the delay in getting her to a hospital certainly seems to me to be suspicious, to put it mildly. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
The Duke of Edinburgh's top aide is to appear at the inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, next week.
Private secretary Brigadier Sir Miles Hunt-Davis is certain to be asked about Harrods tycoon Mohamed al Fayed's claim that the Duke ordered Diana's "murder" in a car crash in Paris in 1997.
The Princess's close friend Rosa Monkton and her stepmother Raine, Countess Spencer, are also listed to give evidence as the inquest enters its 11th week.
In a key few days of evidence Alberto Repossi - the jeweller at the centre of claims that Dodi Fayed had bought an an engagement ring for the Princess - and MP Nicholas Soames, whom Diana allegedly "feared", will also be called.
Others listed include Philippe Doucin, a barman who says he sold drinks to driver Henri Paul at the Ritz Hotel in Paris on the night of the crash, and Dr Arnaud Derossi, who co-ordinated the medical response at the scene of the tragedy in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in the early hours of August 31 1997.
Mohamed al Fayed, whose son Dodi was killed in the crash with Diana and Henri Paul, is convinced the couple were murdered in an MI6 plot which he believes was ordered by the Duke of Edinburgh.
He believes the couple were poised to announce their engagement when they died and that Diana was pregnant with Dodi's child.
Sir Miles is likely to be asked about the whereabouts of correspondence between the Duke and the Princess, which her former butler Paul Burrell claims existed - part of a box of correspondence dubbed the "crown jewels".
The coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker has already told the jury that it is probable the letters from the Duke existed but added: "Where they went and whether they still exist remains a mystery."
Motive is crystal clear to me - she was about to become the princess of Anglo-Muslim relations with the press access to stop the NWO plan to demonise Islam in its tracks........
Absolutely correct Tony. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 2568 Location: One breath from Glory
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:45 pm Post subject:
Sorry not too well up on the Diana stuff. Not been too convinced that it wasnt just an accident
Do we have the body guards testimony any where to corroborate the blinding flash, motorbike, white UNO etc? He was front seat passenger so would have seen all those things. _________________ JO911B.
"for we wrestle not against flesh and blood but against principalities, against powers, against rulers of the darkness of this world, against wicked spirits in high places " Eph.6 v 12
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject:
fish5133 wrote:
Sorry not too well up on the Diana stuff. Not been too convinced that it wasnt just an accident
Do we have the body guards testimony any where to corroborate the blinding flash, motorbike, white UNO etc? He was front seat passenger so would have seen all those things.
I suggest you read 'Jack The Ripper - The Final Solution' by Stephen Knight; it should be enough to convince you that the Royal Family is protected from scandal by high-level Masons who arrange 'convenient' deaths, replete with oodles of assorted 'red herrings' to muddy the investigative waters.
As for why the bodyguard wouldn't speak up - he saw what they did to Diana, and woukld have been under no illusion that a similar fate awaited him. Just in case he was too dim to figure that out for himself, he would have been warned in no uncertain terms.
One good book with a lot of witness evidence in is 'Murder of a Princess' - I don't have the two author's names to hand, but if you can't find the book and are interested, pm me and I'll chase it up. _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7.
Karlos, who changed his name from 'Stelios' Wrote:
Quote:
But there was nothing stopping Charles from marrying Camila
Andrew is divorced, Anne, Margarette, and dozens of minor Royals.
Charles was divorced he could marry without any problem.
As could Diana.
I think pointing fingers at the Royals is wrong. Some people love them some hate them and those prejudices make people blame them. The Royals have not waged wars for quite some time.
Like 911 and 7/7 it would be interesting to hear more about the ambulance crew. who are they and where have they gone since then and why were they the ones who came.
If it is the case that their delays and their negligence finally led to Diana's death then they must be looked into properly.
The crash occured but clearly she was still alive and kicking so the ambulance crew made sure that she died.
Stelios, or Karlos... You are one of the Royal Lovers then. And to quote you"those prejudices make people love them," you could also say.
Just as long as you understand also why it is that people hate the Royal Family.
I also expand that thought, to your particular intention, where the Royals are concerned, being that, Why do you love them so?
They are not English Heretage and therefore have no right.
So why do you defend them?
What do they give you...?
a better life than the common man perhaps..?
saving your own skin,
whilst keeping the down-trodden, down?
Your post covertly pushes the readers thoughts in the direction of the ambulance crew, just as you peel off at the end of the post.
I'm sure we can asumme the real ambulance crew had nothing to do with it.
And it's still the same senario, who ordered the hit? and Why?
I think anyone who is a Royal lover is wrong, and failing to address the root cause of any serious problem is simply pissing in the wind.
You appear spend an inordinate amount of time deflecting peoples attention from the critical points on most any subject, in the defence of the accused.
Why would you do that?
Further more, I see Diana's Murder as Englands 911. Although she was the one to die when she did, many millions have also been murdered because she is not alive today. _________________ The queens real name is: Saxe Coburg Gotha. not Windsor. They were installed in 1915.
Government, Meaning/Translation;
Govern = To Control;
Ment, taken from Latin/Greek, Mente = Mind
Government = Control Mind.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
no offense intended
