Pilots on Simulator

[physicist]

I seems to remember listening to an mp3 file a few months ago
where a pilot stated they couldn't hit the twin towers on a 737
simulator at the high speeds proposed.

Since the 737 is a more manoeverable plane than the 767s
involved, this seems important evidence that supposed
inexperienced terrorist pilots would have been mighty lucky
to strike not only once but twice.

IIRC, they had to slow right down to around landing speeds
before they could hit a tower.

Can anyone provide a link to this evidence, since I can't
find it now?

[Reflecter]

Whilst I cant help with the mp3 you heard, this film you may have seen already does look at the simulator issue from a debunkers viewpoint.

Zembla Dutch TV on 9/11

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5678869025654910464&q= short pentagon relevant section (simulator section at 4.40)

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6624447947169635420&q= Full film.

They claim a rookie MS flight sim and simulator trained pilot can repeatedly execute Hani's magic flight.

I dont care for that verdict personally. Until Snowygrouch's research of the official FDR data is resolved, which shows AA77 didn't strike in the manner the physical evidence suggests, it is contradicted.
Either AA77 didn't hit, or a fake FDR has been issued and both ways the official story is left wanting.

I agree the evidence you mention would strengthen the case. Good luck in re-finding it.

[physicist]

Thanks.

I suppose it's easier to hit the Pentagon than a tower.