Hi from Hampshire

[Hypermaths]

Hi all,

After reading through some of the threads on here I thought I'd sign up so that I can offer my tuppence worth!

What caught my eye initially was the "Is this site being controlled by the 9/11 perps?" thread, as this kind of discussion seems to go on only too much.

I've been involved with a number of 'controversial' subjects over the years, and quite often different people with different views get into discussions which soon become heated and, speaking as a moderator myself, if can be difficult to sort the wheat from the chaff. I'm sure that most people agree that 'agents' probably do have a brief to scan forums and message boards, as part of their job.

What better way to discredit and ridicule 'truthseekers' in the public eye than to cause discontent and disagreement. From an outsider, 'believers' then appear to be a bunch of arguing 'weirdos', and the 'powers that be' can merely sit back, smug that their job has been done and they've not even been seen to have any involvement.

To this end, I believe it's important that people stay focussed and concentrate on the issues at hand - ie. that of providing indisputable evidence that 9/11 was an inside job and that governments are lying to their populations.

Anyway, apologies for the rant, so, "Hi everyone!".

Paul, in Portsmouth

[Lawrence Phillips]

Its a shame there is so much disagreement.. at the end of the day we are all on the same side, we shouldnt waste time arguing over minor details, but thats what we seem to do, i think democracy serves the ellite rulers very well.

Example i often try to inform people at work about certain issues and always end up having to debate out a point with people, which is ok if they agree were on the same side as in We the people, but there is people who trust and belive everything our media and governmental leaders tell us without researching the evidence for themselves.

All through history people have had to fight back against the rulers to keep the balance, so i dont see why now should be any different, but it is.. I dont know.. Back in ancient Rome they would put on a big show when the masses were getting restless.. We have big shows all the time now.. 24hr TV weekly football and such..

Ive gone full circle on this now.. research, confusion doubt, rage, research then finally acceptance that not everything is how we are told it is.

[xmasdale]

[spiv]

[Mark Gobell]

Hi Hypermaths.

[Pikey]

[Mick Meaney]

[Whitehall_Bin_Men]

This sounds like a fair criticism to me. There is little or no financial management towards our aims by this year's board appointed at the AGM.
Two things we should be funding for example:

1. a professional documentary into the London bombings and lobbying mainstream TV commissioning editors. Four amateur documentaries have been made.
2. I'd like to see the resolution which was passed back at the AGM in Leeds in May to appoint a Press Officer implemented.

As far as I know Dave Shayler is still on the payroll so why can't we afford to employ a part time press officer? (no not me but I'm happy to help appoint)

There was a recent meeting in London to look at how to use the law against the 9/11 and 7/7 perpetrators which surely is good, but arguably veering away from what our as yet uncompleted aims are.

[ian neal]

when I get some time over xmas I will try and summarise what I believe has been achieved this year and what hasn't, where we are now and what should be the immediate priorities.

but just to clarify there is no payroll or income beyond what is collected at events which purely cover expenses of the events themsleves so David S is not on the payroll and we have no money for a press officer or a July 7 film at present.

[Mark Gobell]

[Pikey]

[kbo234]

[quote="Pikey"]