| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
whoop45
Minor Poster
Joined: 08 May 2007
Posts: 23
|
 Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: Top 6 9/11 truth researchers lecturers : |
 |
|
Top 6 9/11 truth researchers lecturers :
The Boss:
Nico Haupt (AKA Ewing2001) Without this guy we'd be stuck in the spring of 2002.The inventor of such terms as LIHOP and MIHOP. Writer of the 9/11 lexicon. He scooped the world about the war games, not Michael C. Ruppert; but Nico Haupt.The leading cutting edge from 9-11-01 until this moment. Judge all others by what this man says and you can't go wrong.The man is by far and away the most exhaustive of all 9/11 researchers.Simply the best.
No. 1:
Gerard Holgren.-The bold patriarch Sidney Australian guitar instructor who sent several shots heard round the world with his groundbreaking 9/11 debunking html that many in the 9/11 truth movement sadly still haven't caught up with. This man can be credited with discovering from Bureau of Transportation Statistics records that prove neither of the American Airline flights took off the morning of 9-11-01.You can do the same. Bureau of transportation statistics search engine:
http://www.bts.gov/cgi-bin/ntda/oai/DetailedStatistics/OAI_B1.PL?DetSt a=DepSta&FirLevSel=DetSta
aircraft registry:
http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/acmain.htm
No.2 Rosalee Grable -AKA the Web Fairy, the real leading edge scholar on the subject of black technology energy rays or what-not that pulverized 70 % of the mass of the WTC towers.Obviosly Judy Wood has more scientific knowledge and can quantitate and can better express things mathematically Like Haupt and Holgren Ms. Grable is banned by Wikipedia.
No. 3 Webser Griffin Tarpley - (the highest on my list not banned by Wikipedia) Were not Haupt ,Holgren,and Grable so ineffably great Tarpley would be Number. 1 This man can explain the false warning machine that has existed since the Guy Falks incident in 1605 better than everyone else combined it sometimes seems. The most incredibly knowledgeable person imaginable and an absolute national treasure .Simply the global politics research elder of the planet. His book which nobody dares advertise was no. one on Amazon.com .It outsells David Ray Griffin and Michael C. Ruppert .For an out of body experience go to http://216.240.133.177/Tarpley06.html (2006)or http://216.240.133.177/Tarpley07.html (2007).
No. 4 Jeff King_ M.I.T. professor of physics (AKA the Plague Puppy )on his mind boggling web sight .A complete scientist without the whishy washy half baked homage to LIHOP that we see from the Stephen Jones' of the world. And he's very much a No-planer.
No. 5 Judy Wood (AKA Jane Doe) Clemson U. professor of physics. She's awsome. Even Fetzer admits to that.
No. 6 Richard Grove _Takes off where LIHOP light-weight Micheal C. Ruppert (a very knowlegable man Ruppert, don't get me wrong) bales out. Grove is the reigning expert on the world of private military sub-contractors and the Wall Street criminal thieving mush that surround it for the benefit of banking oligarchs. Like fellow whistle blower Indera Singh Richard Grove, were it not for a twist of fate, would have been killed on 9-11-01.His office was on the 97 th floor. of the north tower. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Easy Rider
Minor Poster
Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 94
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When Webster Tarpley does his uk tour someone should put him on the spot over tv fakery and no planes |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kbo234
Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Easy Rider wrote: | | When Webster Tarpley does his uk tour someone should put him on the spot over tv fakery and no planes |
Yes, let's confuse potential new activists by sending them home confounded, alienated and probably depressed.
Another excellent, terribly sensible suggestion, Easy Rider. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gareth
Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 398
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:47 pm Post subject: Re: Top 6 9/11 truth researchers lecturers : |
|
|
| whoop45 wrote: | Top 6 9/11 truth researchers lecturers :
The Boss:
Nico Haupt (AKA Ewing2001) Without this guy we'd be stuck in the spring of 2002.The inventor of such terms as LIHOP and MIHOP. Writer of the 9/11 lexicon. He scooped the world about the war games, not Michael C. Ruppert; but Nico Haupt.The leading cutting edge from 9-11-01 until this moment. Judge all others by what this man says and you can't go wrong.The man is by far and away the most exhaustive of all 9/11 researchers.Simply the best.
No. 1:
Gerard Holgren.-The bold patriarch Sidney Australian guitar instructor who sent several shots heard round the world with his groundbreaking 9/11 debunking html that many in the 9/11 truth movement sadly still haven't caught up with. This man can be credited with discovering from Bureau of Transportation Statistics records that prove neither of the American Airline flights took off the morning of 9-11-01.You can do the same. Bureau of transportation statistics search engine:
http://www.bts.gov/cgi-bin/ntda/oai/DetailedStatistics/OAI_B1.PL?DetSt a=DepSta&FirLevSel=DetSta
aircraft registry:
http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/acmain.htm
No.2 Rosalee Grable -AKA the Web Fairy, the real leading edge scholar on the subject of black technology energy rays or what-not that pulverized 70 % of the mass of the WTC towers.Obviosly Judy Wood has more scientific knowledge and can quantitate and can better express things mathematically Like Haupt and Holgren Ms. Grable is banned by Wikipedia.
No. 3 Webser Griffin Tarpley - (the highest on my list not banned by Wikipedia) Were not Haupt ,Holgren,and Grable so ineffably great Tarpley would be Number. 1 This man can explain the false warning machine that has existed since the Guy Falks incident in 1605 better than everyone else combined it sometimes seems. The most incredibly knowledgeable person imaginable and an absolute national treasure .Simply the global politics research elder of the planet. His book which nobody dares advertise was no. one on Amazon.com .It outsells David Ray Griffin and Michael C. Ruppert .For an out of body experience go to http://216.240.133.177/Tarpley06.html (2006)or http://216.240.133.177/Tarpley07.html (2007).
No. 4 Jeff King_ M.I.T. professor of physics (AKA the Plague Puppy )on his mind boggling web sight .A complete scientist without the whishy washy half baked homage to LIHOP that we see from the Stephen Jones' of the world. And he's very much a No-planer.
No. 5 Judy Wood (AKA Jane Doe) Clemson U. professor of physics. She's awsome. Even Fetzer admits to that.
No. 6 Richard Grove _Takes off where LIHOP light-weight Micheal C. Ruppert (a very knowlegable man Ruppert, don't get me wrong) bales out. Grove is the reigning expert on the world of private military sub-contractors and the Wall Street criminal thieving mush that surround it for the benefit of banking oligarchs. Like fellow whistle blower Indera Singh Richard Grove, were it not for a twist of fate, would have been killed on 9-11-01.His office was on the 97 th floor. of the north tower. |
The above is nonsense. And highlighted under latest news too?
Nineeleven.co.uk is a mess.
_________________
www.truthaction.org/forum
www.wearechange.org.uk |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kbo234 wrote: | | Easy Rider wrote: | | When Webster Tarpley does his uk tour someone should put him on the spot over tv fakery and no planes |
Yes, let's confuse potential new activists by sending them home confounded, alienated and probably depressed.
Another excellent, terribly sensible suggestion, Easy Rider. |
Despite my receptivity to a lot of Tarpley's various analyses in the past, I have to admit that after the Kennebunkport Warning fiasco, ER's suggestion is a good one.
Which way Mr. Tarpley jumps in response would be a useful indicator to whether he's been turned or not.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 1:23 am Post subject: Re: Top 6 9/11 truth researchers lecturers : |
|
|
| gareth wrote: | The above is nonsense. And highlighted under latest news too?
Nineeleven.co.uk is a mess. |
Don't look at me guys. I've spent a year clearing up after the same re-incarnating handful who can't understand or respect the site (hadly anyone else ever needs moderating) and i'm quite happy to say I've served my time and lay aside the burden
Contact Ian if you fancy a job!
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anthony Lawson
Validated Poster
Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Posts: 370
Location: Phuket, Thailand
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:54 am Post subject: Nonsense |
|
|
Nonsense
| whoop45 wrote: | | No.2 Rosalee Grable -AKA the Web Fairy, the real leading edge scholar on the subject of black technology energy rays or what-not that pulverized 70 % of the mass of the WTC towers.Obviosly Judy Wood has more scientific knowledge and can quantitate and can better express things mathematically Like Haupt and Holgren Ms. Grable is banned by Wikipedia. |
This is utter nonsense. Grable said the following, in an interview with James Fetzer of Scholars for 9/11 truth, with regard to the Naudet video of the first hit:
| Quote: | "There is no plane in the first hit footage, it just ain't there."
"There is no plane in the f-ing footage. None! Not a big plane not a little plane". |
Whether it is faked or real, there is something that looks like a big plane in the Naudet video. Look at a decent copy of the video, not at the mess she's made of whatever copy she was using.
http://questionsquestions.net/WTC/WTC767images/northtowerhit.mov
You'll have to have or download QuickTime, and the file is over 6 meg, but it is pointless looking at anything with less resolution. Put the video on loop, and watch carefully. I began working as a producer, director and editor making commercials in London, in 1967 and I have many international advertising awards to my credit. I know what I am talking about. There is the image of a plane in that video. And to me, having closely looked at all of the possibilities, it is a real plane, captured on video at the same time as the explosion in the Tower.
Please do your homework, before passing on garbage like this. The woman is a fool. She even says that there is a cut in the whip pan to the North Tower. A cut during a whip pan is far easier to see than in a static shot. There is no cut or edit in this shot. The woman does not appear to know anything about camera images or movements.
Try reading some decent material about video images athttp://911research.wtc7.net/essays/salter/review.html
You might also like to consider the following:
During my research, I have come across some video material that I have never seen before, at least not in its entirety, and it has to do with the claims that the nose-cone of the aircraft emerged from the opposite side of the South Tower.
This next-to-impossible event has been used, by those who believe that this was the result of an overlay gone wrong, as proof that a real aircraft did not hit the South Tower. Yet the video I have been looking at shows that this also, is total nonsense.
During a Connie Chung interview with Evan Fairbanks, captioned as an ABC News Exclusive and presumably broadcast on the evening of 9/11, the video in question is allowed to run longer than I have ever seen it run before, in the various apologies for analytical and investigative work on the subject that have recently been surfacing.
It is a low angle, profile shot of the South Tower. At 0:37 seconds the plane enters left of frame, and what apparently looks, to some, its nose-cone and the forward part of the fuselage emerge from the side of the building, a few moments later.
However, as the shot continues, it can be clearly seen that the velocity of this emerging 'entity' begins to decrease and it becomes obvious what it is: A spurt of smoke, being ejected from the building by the explosion. This smoke jet then transforms itself into a plume which then begins to disperse and fade away, in several sections.
In a second showing of the shot, which has been slowed down even more than the first (at timer 1:13) the 'nose-cone' is even clearer, and so is the dispersal. And remember, this is a shot which did not involve a helicopter, but was brought to the station by an independent cameraman.
In my opinion, there would not have been anything like enough time to fake this shot, before it was broadcast, because it does not just involve a profile shot of the plane, then a cut to black, or the 'apparent' nose-cone of the plane being obscured by the North Tower.
The rip in the fabric of the building can be clearly seen developing, and then the ever-enlarging smoke plumes, on three sides of the building, develop in such a way that for this to have been faked would have taken days, if not weeks to accomplish.
It is almost understandable, from the initial velocity of this smoke jet, how it might have been mistaken for the nose cone and forward fuselage section of an aircraft, from videos shot from the opposite side of the building, or if a cut or fade to black had happened before the shot was allowed to run for its full length. But the fact that this video was not, apparently, viewed in conjunction with the other shots, shows a monumental disregard for anything like a true analysis of what happened that day, or something far more sinister.
The sequence can be accessed at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UUDxZS-RSfw
Please do not pass on recommendations that someone knows what they are talking about, if you have not checked them out, properly.
_________________
The truth won't set you free, but identifying the liars could help make the world a better place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Frazzel
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Posts: 480
Location: the beano
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:12 am Post subject: oh no not no planes again |
|
|
excellent anthony! i agree! people need to do their research properly
lets not get diverted down a path like no planes that can easily be discredited and make us look like loonies.
we need to get as many people as possible to question the official conspiracy theory and you wont get em by going on about no planes!
_________________
"injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" Martin Luther king |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
