Wikipedia and lies

[Bushwacker]

[ukginger]

[rodin]

[Dogsmilk]

Banker doesn't care who he lends money to as long as he gets rich shocker!
Hold the front page!

Btw, it's very simplistic to say ww2 consisted of two sides. Or, considering the immeasurably complex sequence of events leading up to it, that it was 'engineered'.

[rodin]

[Dogsmilk]

[rodin]

Don't take my word for it.

[Dogsmilk]

I happen to agree genuine free market capitalism does not exist. I don't think it would be very pleasant if it did either.

The haaretz article is fascinating. I think you're jumping the gun with the 'confession' stuff - this assumes your premise Bolshevism was a 'Jewish conspiracy'. Lets not go there again.
It will be interesting to see if it genuinely has any mileage or if he's just some bloke determined to prove an idea. I'd always thought Stalin has turned away from the tactic of encouraging revolution elsewhere favoured by Lenin. One would wonder why Stalin then chose to ally with Hitler in all but name (e.g. sending Hitler fuel, turning state propaganda against Britain and France) - Germany being one country where there was zero chance of a communist revolution at that time. IIRC, nobody at the time anticipated a long war. No-one ever does. Indeed, the Western front was a sideshow compared to the Eastern front. Jeez - Poland's land army was way bigger than ours.
Personally, my layman's conjecture would be that it was more about securing the at that time vulnerable USSR (if Hitler hadn't been such a poor general with an inability to listen to real generals, it's possible he could have taken out the Soviets) and getting to play out some (embarrassing to admit for an 'anti-imperialist' country) imperialist ambitions by getting to invade the other half of Poland, Lithuania, Finland etc.
In fact, if the plucky Fins had held out a bit longer and Britain and France had actually deployed their 'taskforce' to defend Finland, it's perhaps conceivable there may even have been some kind of Nazi/Soviet alliance against the West. In which case, as they say, we'd all be speaking German.

You may be interested in this -
http://www.amazon.co.uk/White-Eagle-Red-Star-Polish-Soviet/dp/07126069 47/ref=pd_bbs_sr_13/026-6843874-7404400?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1190390833 &sr=8-13
I haven't read it myself, but have read some of his other stuff and really rate him. He hates the Soviets, which you'll like (mind you, he doesn't think much of Holocaust denial neither). At any rate, as you can see, he seems to think (assuming reviewer accuracy) Poland's resistance to the Soviets in 1919-20 averted a possible Soviet invasion of Germany and perhaps other European countries. I'll leave you to formulate theories as to how an initial Jewish Zionist Communist takeover bid organised by Jewish banks was averted.

[rodin]

Hi Dogs. No time to follow up yr lead tonight. Just to quickly mention in passing our friend Skunk has quite a bit on Stalin, including 3 Jewish wives and his real name meaning 'Jew's son'. Last bit hard to believe maybe but checks out on Wikipedia too.

No there is no doubt. Communism was a Jewish affair top to bottom including during WW2 and after, when the USSR had access to UK & US atomic 'secrets' due to the fact that they and ex-Nazis were running the show.

Funny that. International socialists and national socialists working together making WMD. Who'd a thunk it?

Their Masonic branch kept control of NASA. You have to have a big conspiracy to pull of a moon landing hoax.

Internet = BEEEEG problem for the scammers. This stuff is spreading like wildfire, because it makes sense & blows lies away like so much tumble weed. On the net at least truth is growing exponentially.

[Dogsmilk]

Honestly, I know I've said this before, but I seriously recommend ignoring Judicial. By any standard it is an anti-Jewish propaganda site. It'll say anything to make Jews look bad. I mean, it generally opts for a couple of lines of text (no detail) for ach point, sources are rare, and when they do appear they frequently fail to back up what he's trying to say. As a source, it is worthless. As I have said before, the Auschwitz page is so bad it's breathtaking.
This Stalin stuff is yet another example of trying to make facts fit a pre-held belief system. Skunk wants Stalin to be Jewish, so has to find a way of making him Jewish. So his surname apparently meant 'Jew-son'? Ok, the significance of this, if true, is...? If your surname is Smith or Baker, what significance do you think this has for you? Does it mean you're an actual baker or actual smith? What significance do you ascribe to these?:
http://www.jewsonkitchens.co.uk/
http://www.jewson.co.uk/homepage.jsp?_requestid=390262
http://www.jewsonlandscaping.co.uk/Fencing.aspx
Illuminati fronts?
Do you think people with the surname Jewson are, quite literally, allthe 'Sons of Jews', right down the generations?
Stalin was a marxist before he married anyone.
What evidence is there his wives were Jewish? His first died in 1907, so what's the big deal about her? I thought his second wife was from a family with gypsy lineage. What third wife is this? The story he secretly married Rosa Kaganovich?

[rodin]

[rodin]

I don't agree with your dismissal of Judicial-Inc. While it stretches evidence and extrapolates, omits references, and propagandises, it does have a ring of authenticity about the underlying premise. I do not see it being dismantled for being factually incorrect, which, given the 'damage' it must be doing, you would expect. Perhaps TPTB have judged that attacking it will only draw attention? OTOH you may be right - it COULD be an OTT site aimed @ ridiculing criticism of the Zionist agenda. But IMO Rense does a better job of that, with the UFO stories etc.

No, I would say it is a source but one that needs to be always checked. Looks like he was right about the levee's for example

http://www.livevideo.com/video/Dramatube/D8399AD8B5E8436A8D648E7E77633 BEB/special-report.aspx

[rodin]

[Dogsmilk]

Don't take my one-line quote for granted. You can't get any kind of real information from one line. Read around. Check what sources are used. But I'd bet a year's pay Monty is more reliable and objective than Skunk.
I don't know much about the levees stuff, but I do know a number of people suggested they'd been blown. Except I think skunk was fairly unique in blaming it on the Jews. I assume. I don't even need to look at his website to be 100% confident he thinks Jews are to blame. If he didn't, he wouldn't have put it on his website.

I still don't understand why you think Stalin having (if they had been) Jewish wives is important or why a surname translating as 'Jews son" would mean you were Jewish. If you're that bothered, have you considered perhaps looking into Stalin's family tree?

edit - given certain parties round here have come to believe I'm shilling for Zion or whatever, I thought I'd have a nice wholesome Jewish gentleman for my avatar. There's a night on the town with Henry Makow to be won if you can guess who it is.

[rodin]

First names Joseph David?

http://www.jugashvili.com/family/index.htm

Quite a few Jacobs in there too. I think you better concede on thsi point Dogs. I mean, we know about the other prime movers in Bolshevism don;t we? Why should Stalin be the black sheep?

[rodin]

[Dogsmilk]