View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
GazeboflossUK Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 312 Location: County Durham, North-East
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Quote: | New 911 Footage Shows Demolition Truck Near WTC
Garage TV
Saturday September 29, 2007
Previously unseen street level footage from 9/11 "coincidentally" shows a demolition truck near the WTC. Also, much to the disappointment of no-plane disinfo trolls, the sound of plane parts crashing down into the street can clearly be heard when Flight 175 hits the south tower.
VIDEO HERE |
Just to let you know - the "Manhattan Demolitions" truck drives by at 9:22 in the video. _________________ www.myspace.com/garethwilliamsmusic |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mediadisbeliever Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 128 Location: North Humberside
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Amazing footage there. It gives you a very real sense of how it must have felt to be amongst the state of panic and confusion.
So Manhattan Demolition, "Come on Down!" You can run, but you can't hide! Hmm, seems his truck could be first in line to get a lorry load of evidence. I wonder how much Guiliani offered them for 8tons of steel evidence.
Creepy footage is this, especially the dems truck and the falling bodies.
However, there may just be a small chance that this dems truck was working on another project in the vicinity. There's construction work going on all the time in Manhattan. I went there ten years ago and it was just so busy with losts of things go on at the same time that it was hard to take in. I saw lots and lots of construction work in Manhattan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bryan Minor Poster
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 17 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:31 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Quote: | the sound of plane parts crashing down into the street can clearly be heard when Flight 175 hits the south tower. |
More like the cameraman walked into some dustbins. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Bryan wrote: | Quote: | the sound of plane parts crashing down into the street can clearly be heard when Flight 175 hits the south tower. |
More like the cameraman walked into some dustbins. |
Quite. All we hear are parts clanking onto the street. Could be photocopiers or indeed dustbins. We get a brief view of a sleek pristine piece of metal but what is that? Nothing proved either way.
The demolition truck is interesting but non-conclusive
Good wirey footage, but nothing conclusive about anything _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GazeboflossUK Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 312 Location: County Durham, North-East
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
My thoughts pretty much exactly. The sounds could be anything falling. Parts of the building for a simple example.
The second plane hit is a pretty chilling moment in the video. (I mean it's always horrible whenever I see it) _________________ www.myspace.com/garethwilliamsmusic |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Busker Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jun 2006 Posts: 374 Location: North East
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 5:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm.
I can't help but think why has it taken six years for this film to surface.
It would have been worth real money at the time if sold to one of the major networks.
Any thoughts anyone? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
what do people think about the sound of the 2nd hit? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eogz Validated Poster
Joined: 29 Jul 2007 Posts: 262
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not sure, it doesn't sound that out of the ordinary.
Whether dodgy or not, you just can;t help watching it.
The reactions from the guy on the camera are pretty much as you'd expect. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
illeagalhunter Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Jan 2007 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Sun Sep 30, 2007 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It looks more like a bin waggon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I tried a search for "Manhattan Demolition Inc" but I came across this snippet in the New York Times about a certain "John Galt Corporation" that no-one has ever heard of.
Interesting read
"Obscure Company Is Behind 9/11 Demolition Work"
Quote: | The John Galt Corporation of the Bronx, hired last year for the dangerous and complex job of demolishing the former Deutsche Bank building at 130 Liberty Street, where two firefighters died last Saturday, has apparently never done any work like it. Indeed, Galt does not seem to have done much of anything since it was incorporated in 1983.
Public and private records give no indication of how many employees it has, what its volume of business is or who its clients are. There are almost no accounts of any projects it has undertaken on any scale, apart from 130 Liberty Street. Court records are largely silent. Some leading construction executives in the city say they have never even heard of it. |
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/23/nyregion/23company.html?_r=1&th=&emc =th&pagewanted=all&oref=slogin _________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eckyboy Validated Poster
Joined: 03 May 2006 Posts: 162 Location: Edinburgh
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whoever brought down Building 7 were at the top of their game and for me Controlled Demolition are the prime suspects. This John Galt Corporation is certainly worth learning more about though. From this article it seems the company is nothing more than a front. Yet if it is a registered company there will always be a paper trail. Nice find Scubadiver it is not just sunken treasure you unearth. Keep up the good work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nrmis Validated Poster
Joined: 18 Mar 2007 Posts: 294
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My apologies for even posting this but it just caught my eye.
6:29
Like I say, it just caught my eye. How sad am I? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 7:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
the piece of metal in the street is what likely caused the noise of debris raining down, unless of course people really believe it was the camara man catching the bin and the piece of metal floated down to ground level like a feather .
the metal IMO from what i can tell, looks like the cladding that covered the outer walls of the towers, theres a slim possibility it is a piece of plane
but it is impossible to tell or identify, so im almost certain its cladding.
nrmis are you refering to what appears to be "oil ok" written on the pavement at 6.29? because i aint sure what your refering to.
the lorry that goes past is certainly a dustcart with a hydrolic compressor.
i use to work on one for the council years ago now, and i know the council will not take away building rubble using such equipment because it can damage the hydrolic compressor(or so i was told by the driver at least).
so i car'nt see the dustcart being used for anything(if involved) other than clearing away refuge or lighter material such as carpets, fixtures, fittings furniture, maybe plaster board, but steel and brick work, concrete are unlikely.
so IMO the dustcart in question would of been no use or even needed for the job or clean up and must be nothing to do with the event itself.
that is my opinon anyway, that dos'nt mean im right or that i know for certain, im just going by what i know from when i use to work on one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bryan Minor Poster
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 17 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:03 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Quote: | Also, much to the disappointment of no-plane disinfo trolls, the sound of plane parts crashing down into the street can clearly be heard when Flight 175 hits the south tower. |
The quote seems to originate from prisonplanet, who linked to the video.
If, like we're constantly told, there's more than enough evidence that a plane hit the south tower, how come Alex Jones needs to argue the case using dodgy claims about a dodgy video? Anybody following the link can see his comments are nonsense. In fact, if plane parts had landed nearby, wouldn't the cameraman have gone out of his way to film them? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bryan Minor Poster
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 17 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 9:21 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Quote: | Also, much to the disappointment of no-plane disinfo trolls, the sound of plane parts crashing down into the street can clearly be heard when Flight 175 hits the south tower. |
This quote seems to originate from prisonplanet, who linked to the video.
If, like we're constantly told, there's more than enough evidence that a plane hit the south tower, how come Alex Jones needs to argue the case using dodgy claims about a dodgy video? Anybody following the link can see his comments are nonsense. In fact, if plane parts had landed nearby, wouldn't the cameraman have gone out of his way to film them? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
outsider Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Posts: 6060 Location: East London
|
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Given that the video has taken a very long time to surface (unless it has appeared previously as Tony Gosling thinks possible); that it appears to have no author; that it is recognised by some of our forum as a dustcart; that the firm advertised on it's side appears untraceable; and that it has very distinct pictures of the Twin Towers on the side as it passes our strategically positioned 'mystery' cameraman, then it appears to me to have 'All the hallmarks of al Quieda'.
Perhaps Central Casting (or Central 'Intelligence'(sic)) would kindly get us a video of Osama authenticating and explaining the significance of it's surfacing at this juncture?
Re 'Plane parts', even if they were plane parts, does that mean they came from Flight 175? I don't believe there is anybody among the 'no-planers' who claims or suggests that 'nothing' hit the Towers', just that it wasn't passenger-carrying scheduled Flight 175. They may well argue it was a bird, a plane, a missile (with or without encasing hologram) or even Clark Kent's alta ego.
One thing I'm sure of - the footage we all saw of 'Flight 175' hitting the Tower was a fake, no matter how many times the 'Smirkin' Chimp' & Co. tell me otherwise.
Any technical people know if the 'Demolition' blurb and piicture on side of truck could have been 'photo-shopped' onto a perfectly innocent passing dust-cart? _________________ 'And he (the devil) said to him: To thee will I give all this power, and the glory of them; for to me they are delivered, and to whom I will, I give them'. Luke IV 5-7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
disco volante Minor Poster
Joined: 18 Nov 2006 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thanks a million for the posting
DO YOU GUYS SEE THE MOST INCREDIBLE THING IN THAT FILM?
6 minutes 19 seconds in...............yep...
10+ demolition squibs jumping right out of wtc 1 when wtc 2 was struck by
ahem!...........'flight 175'
very good footage _________________ http://www.8thestate.com/
richard andrew grove
one of the best 9/11 truthers.....must see this site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that was hard to spot at first, but yeah it certainly looks like something happened in the other tower at the same time. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Bryan wrote: | Quote: | Also, much to the disappointment of no-plane disinfo trolls, the sound of plane parts crashing down into the street can clearly be heard when Flight 175 hits the south tower. |
This quote seems to originate from prisonplanet, who linked to the video.
If, like we're constantly told, there's more than enough evidence that a plane hit the south tower, how come Alex Jones needs to argue the case using dodgy claims about a dodgy video? Anybody following the link can see his comments are nonsense. In fact, if plane parts had landed nearby, wouldn't the cameraman have gone out of his way to film them? |
it would depend on the person, and if they felt they were in danger.
during the video i certainly got the impression he felt he was in danger and did'nt want to hang about near the area.
so what makes you think he would of gone out of his way to film anything after that point? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bryan Minor Poster
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 17 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
marky 54 wrote: |
so what makes you think he would of gone out of his way to film anything after that point? |
Well, he did carry on filming soon after. He filmed the piece of metal which you think might be cladding, so he must have still been nearby. I just think that plane parts would have been more of a scoop for him. Having said that, there's still the mystery of why it's taken till now to release what he did film. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:34 am Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Bryan wrote: | marky 54 wrote: |
so what makes you think he would of gone out of his way to film anything after that point? |
Well, he did carry on filming soon after. He filmed the piece of metal which you think might be cladding, so he must have still been nearby. I just think that plane parts would have been more of a scoop for him. Having said that, there's still the mystery of why it's taken till now to release what he did film. |
yes he did film a piece of metal, on his way OUT of there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 6342
|
Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:59 am Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
Bryan wrote: | marky 54 wrote: |
so what makes you think he would of gone out of his way to film anything after that point? |
Having said that, there's still the mystery of why it's taken till now to release what he did film. |
Could be anything! Anyone thought of the 'found on a stolen laptop' analogy? _________________ 'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bryan Minor Poster
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 17 Location: Bolton
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:16 pm Post subject: Re: NEW 911 WTC Street Level Footage shows Demolition Truck |
|
|
What this video does prove is that prisonplanet are pretty desperate to convince people the south tower was hit by a plane. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|