Chance to post your views on United 93 on timesonline

[grahamb]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,564-2206401,00.html

[Andrew Johnson]

It said 250 words or less, so I sent this:

========
Whatever the merits of this film may or may not be, the story it is based on has become known as The Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) of 9/11, promulgated and supported by the US administration.

As a member of Scholar's for 9/11 Truth (www.st911.org), I reject all the main elements of the story which this film is based on as false – because a scientific study of the main evidence does not support the validity of the OCT.

To give you 2 examples: it is most unlikely ordinary cell phone calls could've worked, due not only to the height but also due to the speed at which the plane was travelling (standard cellphone technology only works when the user is travelling at less than about 140mph). The problem with “handoff” means the calls could not have been successful.

Additionally, the debris from Flight 93 was spread over an area of about 8 square miles – this would not be possible if the plane crashed into the ground.

Universal Studios Internet Chat Forums had to be shut down when they were “Overrun” by people posting the facts about the case to refute the film’s propagandist nature.

All viewers of this film, and, indeed the general populace should be made aware of the facts about the story of 9/11, because we are in very grave danger from the covert bodies which planned and executed 9/11 and blamed muslim fundamentalists for it. Join our UK campaign at www.nineeleven.co.uk

[TruthKey]

[Reflecter]

I sent the following for what its worth. they rarely print them but its always worth a shot.
======

I would prefer to see a film on the other heroes of that day, such as the NYFD and William Rodrigues who helped many escape the towers prior to thier incredible almost explosive collapses. Of course these heroes have all been under gag orders and media stonewall treatment since the day, so thats unlikely. Flight 93 has many oddities connected to it, from the first pilot trials of cell phones in flight, occuring July 2004 by American Airlines, now rejected in 2006 as too dangerous, to the strange debris field and reports of Fighter Jets in the area at crash time. Reports of it landing, a US Colonel claiming its all fabricated and reports that it is still in UA active operation. As a UK member of the Scholars for Truth I am hopeful the full story of UA93 will someday emerge from research and exposure via public pressure. A stand down appears to have been in place, confusing war games and drills, whilst mistakenly identified Martyrs are non-existent upon manifests and leave no DNA,all oddities that need explaining, whilst the directors painstaking research extends only to the 911 Omission Distort that has holes large enough to fly a 767 cleanly through. If we are wrong, fair enough, but these are questions which demand answers and not bombing compaigns against potential innocents.