View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Indubitably 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 264
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:00 am Post subject: The True State of Affairs ? |
|
|
6 years have passed since the tragic events of 9/11. I'd like to make a series of posts on what we know (and what we do not know) about the crime. But first I'd like to ask other members here for their views on the following questions -
1. Since the crimes of 9/11/2001 were committed not by 19 Arabs armed with boxcutters who were being commanded by another Arab from some foreign hideout, but were an orchestrated 'inside job' involving fakery, deception and downright lies, how long will it be before this forum and others like it identify/agree upon the specific individuals and organisations who should be arrested and prosecuted for their complicity in those terrible crimes ? IS the 9/1 truth movement at this distance of years able to tell who WAS responsible ?
2. The remarkable series of film clips (available on sites such as Youtube, Google Video etc.) and brilliantly compiled from the ACTUAL TELEVISED broadcasts of the corporate media on 9/11/2001 entitled 'September Clues' (which has been seen worldwide over several months) shows many plain examples of media fakery and image manipulation by these broadcasters. The 9/11 truth movement is of course obliged to study the actual evidence presented by 'September Clues' whether it contradicts years of false assumption and misinformation ior not. In one case we have video footage on 'September Clues' that was broadcast live on that day from New York showing a huge explosion and fireball at the World Trade Centre but not any sight of any plane colliding with the tower. It's live footage and it was broadcast live from New York, aken from a helicopter and with it being commented on as it happens. Does this forum agree that in the case of that LIVE video film clip (of NO PLANE) such evidence is highly suggestive of NO PLANE being the cause of that huge fireball ?
3. What are the views of this forum on the undeniable evidence of co-ordinated fakery and of wholesale unaccountability by the major media corporations for their own broadcasting plane images as 'live' shots n their broadcasts on 9/11/2001 ? This certainly involving a 17 second delay in televised 'live' transmission, the introduction of fake plane images etc, as is again as proved beyond reasonable doubt to have occurred on the series 'September Clues' ?
Truth is a matter too important to be hihacked.
Thank You
Last edited by Indubitably on Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:17 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, if you're looking for brutally frank opinions, mine is that No Planes Theory is a psy-op aimed at the fantasy minded and/or uninformed and/or mentally unstable; the major proponents appear to be a combination to a greater or lesser degree of all three.
Just peruse the websites that specialise in it for any length of time for confirmation of that.
'September Clueless' is an apt retitling. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spiv Validated Poster
Joined: 01 Jul 2006 Posts: 483
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:31 am Post subject: Re: The True State of Affairs ? |
|
|
Indubitably wrote: | ...how long will it be before this forum and others like it identify/agree upon the specific individuals and organisations who should be arrested and prosecuted for their complicity in those terrible crimes ? IS the 9/1 truth movement at this distance of years able to tell who WAS responsible ? |
Indubitably, who would you name as the real perpetrators??
As for myself, I have no-one I can prove did this, but that is not to say I don't have my own suspicions. That is why my own stance is that the World needs a proper, thorough, non-political criminal investigation and thorough inquiry into this crime, and then the suspects rounded up, charged and tried in a World Criminal Court, maybe at the Hague.
And certainly I believe that Blair (and others who supported his decision) needs to be arrested and tried for war crimes including illegally invading two other nations who have never attacked Britain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
chek,
as you completely dismiss tv fakery, in relation to the twin towers, (yet, probably, accept it in relation to the bin laden videos, and media scripting, concerning wtc7). i wonder if you have any clues as to what new lines of research should be considered, that will shed light on the twin towers black op. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jfk wrote: | chek,
as you completely dismiss tv fakery, in relation to the twin towers, (yet, probably, accept it in relation to the bin laden videos, and media scripting, concerning wtc7). i wonder if you have any clues as to what new lines of research should be considered, that will shed light on the twin towers black op. |
Look at it this way.
TV fakery - as NPT is being remarketed - doesn't even convince the majority of truthers (or truthlings as the derogatory term is now) who already know that 911 was a scam to justify the Middle East invasion.
Weak-to-imaginary evidence also means its chances of convincing the outside world is zero. A billion new nonsense geeky pop videos repeating the same faulty perceptions won't change that.
The proven physical evidence of ultra high temperatures at GZ on the other hand cannot be explained by the Official Conspiracy. The collusion by the security and intelligence agencies (or elements within them, to be more accurate) are also provable. The phoney Black Box data supposedly recovered from the Pentagon - all solid and provable. Those areas alone are enough to crack open the dam.
So why has nothing happened since that work was done?
Any legal case is eventually going to come up against the same Supreme Court who actually enabled the Bush Junta in the first place - so their judgement can be taken for granted when it comes to predicting which way they'll jump in any decision.
They'll need to be forced into taking other factors into consideration other than their own agenda.
In order to do that, the political climate needs to change, which involves political activism and street actions - not yet more Youtube videos.
A tidal wave of public pressure needs to be built up which scares the nonsense out of Congress, the Senate and SCOTUS and leaves them no choice but to allow an investigation that is and is seen to be independent and beyond any political interference.
There are no new lines of research that need to be considered.
What is needed is co-ordinated and effective action with solid evidence that will bring the public onside and clamouring for the truth of what happened in 2001 that brought us to where we are today.
Does that answer your question? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The proven physical evidence of ultra high temperatures at GZ on the other hand cannot be explained by the Official Conspiracy |
how would you explain this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gruts Major Poster
Joined: 28 Apr 2007 Posts: 1050
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
is there any point to this thread or is it just more "september clues" spam? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jfk wrote: | how would you explain this? |
Well that's the beauty of it - even leaving aside Jones' work on identifying thermate chemical signatures and molten iron contemporary with collapse - the metallurgical high temperature effects were already recorded by FEMA (appendix C) and don't need to be further established.
That's evidence to be investigated, without any speculation on our part being required. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gruts wrote: | is there any point to this thread or is it just more "september clues" spam? |
It would appear so. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Another day, another sock-puppet
"they" are doing it "for our own good" to "save" us you know _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gruts, i believe you failed to answer my question, how do you explain the high temps?
steven jones' sulphur signitures don't prove jack!
because there were other materials in the towers that contain sulphur. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jfk wrote: | gruts, i believe you failed to answer my question, how do you explain the high temps?
steven jones' sulphur signitures don't prove jack!
because there were other materials in the towers that contain sulphur. |
All you've proved by your simplistic 'analysis' is that you haven't investigated either Jones' work or FEMA's initial findings before NIST became involved. Your assertion that sulphur is sulphur is just ordinary, could-come-from-any-random-source sulphur demonstrates that clearly.
On the contrary, the multi-element chemical signature is distinctive enough to identify its origin as be likened to tracing the genetic signature of the anthrax used in the postal attacks on key Democrats (although only ordinary hapless Joes were the actual victims) back to Fort Detrick. And look what happened with that investigation.
Don't rely on second hand demonising by those with their own agenda.
Check it out for yourself. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
John White wrote: | Another day, another sock-puppet
"they" are doing it "for our own good" to "save" us you know |
... and, if I don't presume too much, to finish that thought, I doubt the the world has ever known any greater source of tears than those who would 'save us' for 'our own good'.
There were probably never any greater philanthropists in their own mind's eyes, as Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and Kagame (to name but a select few). _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Indubitably 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 264
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, thanks for the answers. It seems very clear that as far as the ACTUAL broadcast material 'live' is concerned (which is the issue here) - i.e. material put out as 'live' on 9/11/2001 by major news corporations is material that has been faked by these same corporate broadcasters. That means, people who infiltrated these lawful broadcasting corporations BEFORE 9/11/2001 WERE complicit in the crimes of 9/11 - doesn't it ? IT MEANS THE CRIMINALS OF 9/11/2001 INCLUDE THESE MEMBERS OF THE CORPORATE MEDIA WHO WERE INVOLVED IN VIDEO FAKERY.
So simple questions are these -
Q1. MEDIA FAKERY AND FAKE WITNESSES WERE DEFINITELY PART OF THE CRIMES OF 9/11 - TRUE OR FALSE ?
Q2. THE MEDIA CORPORATIONS WHOSE BROADCASTS ON THAT DAY INCLUDE SUCH FAKE/FALSE VIDEO MATERIAL SHOULD BE AND ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR FAKE/FALSE VIDEO BROADCASTS AND FOR PUBLISHING WHAT THEY HAVE DONE ABOUT THIS FAKERY - TRUE OR FALSE ?
Q3. MEMBERS OF THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT MUST, AS A MATTER OF SIMPLE JUSTICE, ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MEDIA FAKERY WAS INDEED PART OF THE CRIMES OF 9/11. - TRUE OR FALSE ?
'September Clues' presents a case that cannot be avoided. It is an analysis of the actual footage that was broadcast. That is why it is a valid part of the 9/11 truth movement.
Agents of misinformation may disagree. The 9/11 truth movement welcomes truth. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
chek wrote: | John White wrote: | Another day, another sock-puppet
"they" are doing it "for our own good" to "save" us you know |
... and, if I don't presume too much, to finish that thought, I doubt the the world has ever known any greater source of tears than those who would 'save us' for 'our own good'.
There were probably never any greater philanthropists in their own mind's eyes, as Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot and Kagame (to name but a select few). |
So True
And:
(reference above post)
Doesn't it suck being so consistantly right? _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indubitably wrote: | 'September Clues' presents a case that cannot be avoided. It is an analysis of the actual footage that was broadcast. That is why it is a valid part of the 9/11 truth movement.
Agents of misinformation may disagree. The 9/11 truth movement welcomes truth. |
'September Clueless' is itself the misinformation.
How anybody can't see that it's selective, speculative, in-your-face misinterpretation taken too many degrees past belief is beyond me.
I would bet that there isn't one convert to that piece of collected garbage that isnt subconsciously railing against 'the meeja' for being condemned to watching a minimum of 8 hours a day TV since the age of 4.
Give up watching TV, read some - any - books, and then view it again after a month or two is my recommendation.
Yours sincerely,
agentofdisiniformationinc.com _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us.
Last edited by chek on Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 1873 Location: Upstairs
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indubitably wrote: | So simple questions are these -
Q1. MEDIA FAKERY AND FAKE WITNESSES WERE DEFINITELY PART OF THE CRIMES OF 9/11 - TRUE OR FALSE ?
Q2. THE MEDIA CORPORATIONS WHOSE BROADCASTS ON THAT DAY INCLUDE SUCH FAKE/FALSE VIDEO MATERIAL SHOULD BE AND ARE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR FAKE/FALSE VIDEO BROADCASTS AND FOR PUBLISHING WHAT THEY HAVE DONE ABOUT THIS FAKERY - TRUE OR FALSE ?
Q3. MEMBERS OF THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT MUST, AS A MATTER OF SIMPLE JUSTICE, ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MEDIA FAKERY WAS INDEED PART OF THE CRIMES OF 9/11. - TRUE OR FALSE ? |
To cite 'corporations' as being responsible for broadcasting manipulated footage on the day is a trifle heavy-duty. It will not be more the tiniest handful who were actually pressing buttons or influencing feeds if it happened at all.
I view a percentage of the footage as being faked post-event and it is only subsequently that Youtube etc has seen the proliferation of dodgy/faked footage being circulated and becoming the norm. That said, I would even suggest that most is just some numpty with a good editing suite/software out to create some devilment but adding ejecting nosecones more than some suited herbert working for the 'perps'.
I am unable to equate the possibility of 'live' feed on the day showing X, when fifty people down on the street with camcorders all show us Y - this makes no sense and would unquestionably mess with the finer points of the day. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bryan Minor Poster
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 17 Location: Bolton
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2007 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wel you really show to what depth you studied it when you're reduced to sniping about the pictures, eh?
I expect you missed not having a colouring-in section as well.
Here's some real world experience for ya. Get a colour brochure printed on glossy stock, and then a flyer printed on card stock, and then compare it to your webpage, and then come back and complain about colour fidelity/fakery.
Ok? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us.
Last edited by chek on Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:21 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
"indubitably" does well to hold his ground.
LIVE footage, of the second hit, shows NO PLANE.
those who question this:
DO YOU THINK THE RESEARCHERS FAKED IT?
OR DO YOU THINK SOMEONE ELSE FAKED IT?
OR DO YOU THINK THERE WAS NO PLANE?
ARE WE LONG SIGHTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(or short sighted, or blind, or colourblind, or something else)
either way someone faked it, or there was no plane
Quote: | realise the differance between proving a clip has been faked and proving who faked it |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
jfk wrote: | "indubitably" does well to hold his ground. |
Of course he (Mr 1 post) does. That what socks are meant to say. Otherwise there's no point to their existence.
jfk wrote: | LIVE footage, of the second hit, shows NO PLANE.
|
Is that so? We'll just accept that because you say so, shall we?
jfk wrote: | those who question this: |
...I guess that includes me then.....
jfk wrote: | DO YOU THINK THE RESEARCHERS FAKED IT? |
Faked what?
jfk wrote: | OR DO YOU THINK SOMEONE ELSE FAKED IT? |
Um...faked what exactly?
jfk wrote: | OR DO YOU THINK THERE WAS NO PLANE? |
You're being hopelessly unspecific here....
jfk wrote: | ARE WE LONG SIGHTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(or short sighted, or blind, or colourblind, or something else) |
An optician would be better qualified to address your concerns about that.
jfk wrote: | either way someone faked it, or there was no plane |
I see ...(?)
jfk wrote: | Quote: | realise the differance between proving a clip has been faked and proving who faked it | | [/quote]
Ah gotcha, very true. Just like quoting a quote isn't the same as quoting a quota of the quoter's quotes. Neat. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
jfk wrote:
LIVE footage, of the second hit, shows NO PLANE.
Quote: | Is that so? We'll just accept that because you say so, shall we? |
for those that have not seen this ACTUAL LIVE FOOTAGE
http://youtube.com/watch?v=DIKen_q_C6M
jfk wrote:
DO YOU THINK THE RESEARCHERS FAKED IT?
see above link
OR DO YOU THINK SOMEONE ELSE FAKED IT?
Quote: | Um...faked what exactly?
|
see above link
jfk wrote:
OR DO YOU THINK THERE WAS NO PLANE?
Quote: | You're being hopelessly unspecific here....
|
are you a no planer? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 1:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
jfk wrote: | jfk wrote:
LIVE footage, of the second hit, shows NO PLANE. |
Correct - nor would it. Mainly because the shot is taken from the north looking towards the southern tip of Manhattan and the plane APPROACHED FROM THE SOUTH.
jfk wrote: | DO YOU THINK THE RESEARCHERS FAKED IT? |
NO I THINK IT'S JUST THEY'RE A BIT DIM AND THEY CAN'T COMPREHEND HOW UNRELATED IT IS TO THEIR CASE.
jfk wrote: | OR DO YOU THINK SOMEONE ELSE FAKED IT? |
I'VE NO REASON TO THINK IT IS A FAKE.
jfk wrote: | OR DO YOU THINK THERE WAS NO PLANE? |
NO, I THINK THE PLANE CAN'T BE IN VIEW IN THAT SHOT.
jfk wrote: | are you a no planer? |
Are you taking the piss??? _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jfk Moderate Poster
Joined: 19 Aug 2007 Posts: 246
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
No, I don't do proof by Youtube video.
You had your shot, I watched one of your links and you blew it with the same old nonsense.
No more. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karlos Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 2516 Location: london
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 4:03 am Post subject: Re: The True State of Affairs ? |
|
|
spiv wrote: |
As for myself, I have no-one I can prove did this, but that is not to say I don't have my own suspicions. That is why my own stance is that the World needs a proper, thorough, non-political criminal investigation and thorough inquiry into this crime, and then the suspects rounded up, charged and tried in a World Criminal Court, maybe at the Hague.
And certainly I believe that Blair (and others who supported his decision) needs to be arrested and tried for war crimes including illegally invading two other nations who have never attacked Britain. |
I agree entirely with this position.
With regards to the September Clues issue. I have seen this film as well and it does raise many questions. But i must say hand on heart this does not prove there were no planes.
We all agree that the media was manipulated and even participated in the spreading of lies. The media planted false stories, used biased experts and also used faked film footage. But faked footage does not automatically mean the whole event was faked.
Whether there are planes or not,
whether the planes were civilian or cargo,
whether there were demolition charges or mini nukes,
etc, etc,
should not distract us from the real issue which is that more than 3000 people were murdered, more than $10 billion was made by the culprits, wars, invasions and possibly a million civilians dead, facist laws imposed, and the killers walking around with their heads tall free from arrest, impeachment and prosecution,
to me it matters not the fine details, the big picture is what is important, and dear colleagues 6 years on we must never lose focus on what the big picture is. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Indubitably 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 264
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What IS 'September Clues' ?
It's a compilation of the ACTUAL visual broadcasts of the corporate media on 9/11/2001. That's what it is.
What is the 'truth movement' ?
Well, the 'truth' movement is an attempt to tell YOU what you can think, and what you can discuss on the events of 9/11/2001.
Notice that the so-called 9/11 'truth' movement has failed to do the following -
1. It has failed completely to question or to put pressure on the corporate media for its multiple examples of faked televised footage on 9/11/2001.
CAN ANY MEMBER HERE TELL US OF ANY REPLY FROM THE MEDIA CORPORATIONS ON THEIR 'PLANE' FOOTAGE ????
2. The media IS accountable for its broadcasts. Right ? OK - why doesn't the '9/11 truth movement' ask these same media corporations to be accountable for the visual images THEY broadcast on that tragic day of 'planes' hitting the WTC ? Images that are held forever worldwide on video tapes ? But the '9/11 truth movement' have NEVER done this. Suspicious, right ?
3. The '9/11 truth movement' have never in 6 years discussed or encouraged discussion of the individual examples of such media 'plane' fakery. In fact, they want you to forget NPT altogether. Its leaders have simply gone round and round in circles with their misinformation and have NEVER examined this fakery evidence in the detail that it deserves.
I THEREFORE CONCLUDE, 6 YEARS AFTER THE TRAGEDY, THAT THE 'TRUTH MOVEMENT' (SO-CALLED) IS AT A CROSSROADS. IT EITHER ACCEPTS CLEAR EVIDENCE OF MEDIA FAKERY AS IS SHOWN FROM ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE CONTAINED IN 'SEPTEMBER CLUES' AND OTHER SOURCES OR IT IS EXPOSED AS A FRAUD. THE EVIDENCE OF MEDIA FAKERY IS OVERWHELMING.
We owe it to the victims of 9/11 to expose and to show widely how great a part media jesuitry played in those crimes and we must not to be led on exposing them. THAT is the task of the real truth movement. A group of individuals who deal with truth.
You believe real planes struck the WTC on 9/11 ? Great. Study the actual broadcast footage from that day and you will chance your view. As have many thousands of people.
Welcome to the 9/11 truth movement.
End of Lecture |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Indubitably 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 264
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What IS 'September Clues' ?
It's a compilation of the ACTUAL visual broadcasts of the corporate media on 9/11/2001. That's what it is.
What is the 'truth movement' ?
Well, the 'truth' movement is an attempt to tell YOU what YOU can think, and what YOU can discuss on the events of 9/11/2001.
Notice that over the past 6 years the so-called 9/11 'truth' movement has failed to do the following -
1. It has failed completely to question or to put pressure on the corporate media for their multiple examples of faked televised footage on 9/11/2001.
CAN ANY MEMBER OF THIS FORUM TELL US OF ANY REPLY FROM THE MEDIA CORPORATIONS ON THEIR LIVE BROADCAST 'PLANE' FOOTAGE ????
2. The corporate media IS accountable for its broadcasts. Right ? OK - why doesn't the '9/11 truth movement' ask these media corporations to be accountable in responding to analysis of these visual images of 'planes' which THEY broadcast on that tragic day ? Images that are held forever worldwide as evidence on countless video tapes worldwide ? But the '9/11 truth movement' have NEVER done this. Nor have they ever suggested it should be done. Suspicious, right ?
3. The '9/11 truth movement' have never in 6 years discussed or encouraged discussion of the many individual examples of such media 'plane' fakery. In fact, its leaders want you to forget NPT (No Planes Theory) altogether. And so they want you to go round and round in circles and the 'movement' have NEVER examined this 'plane' fakery evidence in the detail that it really deserves.
I THEREFORE CONCLUDE, 6 YEARS AFTER THE TRAGEDY, THAT THE 'TRUTH MOVEMENT' (SO-CALLED) IS AT A CROSSROADS. IT EITHER ACCEPTS AND ENCOURAGES DISCUSSION ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS OF MEDIA FAKERY AS IS SHOWN FROM ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGINAL FOOTAGE, CONTAINED IN SUCH PUBLICLY AVAILABLE SOURCES AS 'SEPTEMBER CLUES' AND OTHER SOURCES OR IT 'THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT' IS EXPOSED AS A FRAUD AND A COMPLETE WASTE OF TIME. THE EVIDENCE OF MEDIA FAKERY IS OVERWHELMING.
We owe it to the victims of 9/11 to expose fakery, to acknowledge that it IS part of the crime, and to show widely how great a part media jesuitry played and still plays. THAT is the real task of the real truth movement. A group of individuals who deal with truth and who expose fraud.
You still believe real planes struck the WTC on 9/11 ? Great. So did I. But study the actual broadcast footage from that day as it was received by millions of television viewers closely and you will change your view. As have many thousands of people.
Welcome to the 9/11 truth movement.
End of Lecture |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2007 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indubitably wrote: | What IS 'September Clues' ?
THE EVIDENCE OF MEDIA FAKERY IS OVERWHELMING.
End of Lecture |
September Clueless hasn't even succeeded in its alleged mission of showing there is ANY evidence of fakery, let alone hyping it to be "overwhelming".
Where it succeeds admirably is in gulling the gullible, misinforming the uninformed and pandering to the intellectually lazy and/or incompetent.
Like all variations of No Plane Theory it's a crock, and a poor one at that.
End of story. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|