Was there media fakery on 911

[my left bollock]

Let's see how many think the media is innocent of this crime

[TmcMistress]

[Indubitably]

Fakery of virtually every sort.

The broadcast images of 'planes' on 9.11.2001 include such things as entire city backgrounds being edited out. Numerous examples were broadcast. We see crucial detail of these supposed planes being obscured by editors (take for example the 'nose out' that was obscured in later CNN broadcasts that day) and in other cases where banners are added to the broadcast, these obscuring our view of city landscapes or reference points. We see the addition of 'planes' which never actually flew. We see example after example of fake witnesses to 'planes'. In fact, the earliest 'witnesses' to plane strikes at the WTC that are given air time on television stations just happen to be relatives of or employees of the media corporations themselves ! It's a farce.

5 media corporations broadcast 'live' film of the supposed hit of a plane on the South Tower that day. Not one of those films survives detailed analysis. They are all fakes, differing from each other in many respects.

But, above all (and here there is NO argument) these same corporations remain, to this day, UNACCOUNTABLE for their output.

That's the plain truth of it.

[Newspeak International]

Asuming were talking of a few individuals to forward the agenda,then yes
it certainly looks that way.

[fish5133]

Now weve all read the PNAC stuff showing that certain fanatical neocon idealists had a motive and the power channels in order to pull some strings. However as i see it people in the media are a different kettle of fish.( not so fanatical but just sympathetic lap dogs to Government) To involve media fakery would in my mind have to involve too many media people who would have no motive to want to be involved. It would need to involve technicians and lower paid staff to plan produce and air the fakery and from different networks. I just dont buy the idea that someone from on high in the media has had a planning meeting with a group of technicians and computer kids and said "Look elements in the Government are going to blow up the Twin Towers probably kill several 1000 US citizens (oh and by the way do any of you have family, friends, relatives who work in the towers as you will have to tell them when its happening and they must keep it quiet) and pretend it was planes but they want us to make some media fakery. We dont need to worry about the first explosion but you are going to have to produce the goods for the second explosion as all the eyes of New Yorkers will be staring up at the towers, of course they are not going to see anything but we have to convince them it was a very big plane"
In my opinion if i was the perpetrator I would want to involve as few a people as possible and people who could be trusted not to squeal. This to my mind also rules out the COMPLETE wiring of the Towers with explosives. The idea of some other exotic type of weaponry carries some weight as it might only require a few people
Now that all said some of the film footage as portrayed in september clues does raise questions i.e if it is not itself conspiracy fakery.
Eyewitnesses who said they didnt see a plane could just have been standing in the wrong place. The "plane" does appear to just melt into the building. The "nose out" if genuine is highly suspicious. A lot of the other stuff is a bit too technical for me unlike the 10 sec collapse.