Why I Resign in Disgust From the 9/11 'Truth' Movement

[Indubitably]

The 9/11 'Truth Movement' (of which this forum is a classic example) has become nothing more than a campaign of misinformation. It, like others, starts by admitting that the crimes of 9.11.2001 were an 'inside job'. Great. (But 80% of the world's population already believe that).

As years have passed the 'truth movement' has achieved precisely WHAT ????

1. The 'truth movement' want YOU to believe the USA government is responsible for the inside job of 9/11/2001. It WASN'T. IT ISN'T. The truth is (and everyone can see it) a SMALL MINORITY of people with vested interests infliltrated agencies of the US government, the corporate media and other agencies such as the New York Fire service. A VERY BIG DIFFERENCE.

2. Look at the plain facts. A tree is known by its fruits. Over 6 whole years members of the so-called '9/11 truth movement' have NEVER, at any time, demanded answers from broadcaster from its various websites for the fake televised footage of 'planes' that were shown live on that day. They've got no record of writing or lobbying these corporate broadcaster. This despite the fact that there is indisputable evidence NO planes hit the twin towers. None hit the Pentagon. And no plane crashed at Shanksville.

3. I ask any fair minded person to see at least one of the dozens of clips that show fakery. For example, go to the LIVE broacast footage that is found online at 'September Clues'. Part 3. That segment begins with footage that was shot from a helicopter looking straight at the twin towers. It has commentary. It was broadcast LIVE. It focuses on the twin towers at the moment of a great fireball bursting out of the South Tower. There is NO plane seen in this clear, unmistakable footage. The live commentators themselves do NOT speak of any 'plane'. THERE WAS NO PLANE. EXAMINE IT OVER AND OVER. THERE IS NO APPROACH OF ANY PLANE. NO SIGN OF ANY PLANE. CHECK-MATE !!!

4. Since powerful people infiltrated the corporate media and are responsible for broadcasting fake 'plane' videos you must surely agree they are complicit in the crimes of 9/11. It also follows that the criminals wish to divert us from appreciating these are fake planes. They are perfectly happy to have, year after year, a 'truth movement' which never, ever, deals with the huge evidence now available of faked planes. Bogus images that they never actually discuss in detail.

I resign from the 'truth movement'. The video taped evidence from live broadcasts on that day is clear and it forces me to resign. It includes a mass of clear evidence for media manipulation by broadcasters. In one case it even shows the supposed nose of a plane emerging from the other side of the South Tower ! That too, is physically impossible. Yet it was broadcast as evidence of a plane hitting the South Tower repeatedly on 9/11/2001 - by media corporations.

There are dozens of examples of videos of 'planes' being altered or cut or manipulated in other ways which were broadcast on 9/11/2001.

AT WHAT POINT DO YOU, DEAR MEMBER, REALISE THAT THE CORPORATE MEDIA, THE INTERNET, IS BEING CONTROLLED BY AGENTS OF MISINFORMATION ?

By fairly examining actual broadcast footage of 'planes' on that day (which will stand for all time as evidence) you will realise the media corporations WERE infiltrated by liars and criminals who created fakery - men and women who were/are part of that crime/that tragedy and who are lying when they say, six years later, they are really interested in truth. Fake videos, fake witnesses and a fake 'truth' movement.

Of course you must reject the theory of No Planes. The fake 'truth movement' don't want YOU to put pressure on the corporate media. They don't want you to closely study the actual broadcast footage of 'planes' on that day. THAT'S THE TRUTH. And that's why, 6 years later, those interested in truth such as myself resign in disgust from the so-called 'truth movement'.

The challenge was made here today. Examine 'September Clues' Part 3 and tell us whether any plane hit the South Tower. The evidence says NO PLANE hit the South Tower. The truth movement bases its views on such evidence. Truth is dealing fairly, openly with the available evidence. The evidence is clear for all to see.

[spiv]

Bye..

[Indubitably]

Yes, bye. 'What fellowship has light with darkness ?'

[Indubitably]

Yes, bye. 'What fellowship has light with darkness ?'

[chek]

[telecasterisation]

[Indubitably]

80% is a conservative figure.

The entire world (outside of the mass media) does NOT believe 19 Arabic men (some of whom had been issued with US driving licences by a US military base and others living in Florida waiting for their Green Card, with still others still alive and well enough to be interviewed by the BBC and living in North Africa at this time), were armed with little more than box-cutters and hijacked 4 commercial planes and their passengers on 9.11.2001. Nor are any of these supposed hijackers named on any passenger list. Nor were these supposed hijackers able to evade the entire military establishment of the USA while flying round in circles for hours, eventually crashing their planes and themselves in staggering feats of pilot brilliance in to two giant towers, also in to the most heavily defended fortress in the entire world (the Pentagon) without a single plane image of their deed being caught, and also crashing a plane and its passengers in to a hole in the ground in Shanksville.

For, the most crazy thing is this - DRILLS FOR EXACTLY ALL OF THOSE 4 EVENTS WERE OCCURRING ON THAT DAY FOR PRECISELY SUCH SITUATIONS.

No, the 80 per cent figure is a conservative one.


The official report is garbage.

P.S. Can you justify your statement that 'the majority of the Chinese people have never heard of 9/11' ??? I look forward to your reply since I suggest you are very mistaken. Most Chinese homes have a television.

[ian neal]

Bye

Before you go perhaps you can explain why you and other advocates of TV fakery waited for nearly 5 years before putting your TV fakery theories in the public domain and what has prevented you / TvF advocates from presenting the case to the media. What is it that you want the 'truth movement' to do that you aren't capable of doing for yourself?

Seeing as how you are resigning from the 'truth movement' as typified by this site (which of course you will know all about having just arrived), would you like me to terminate your account for you?

[rubber_ritchie]

When one hangs around with progressive people you may come to the conclusion that 'everyone knows....' but sadly a lot of people inlcuding well 'educated' people do not question anything about the 911 story.

Sir, you say you 'resign from the movement'. Does this mean you will never mention 911 to anyone again? Are you not going to campaign anymore? A 'movement' is a very broad term. I agree with a lot of what you say but think we need to unite in our diversity. I am sure many people who are 'members' also agree with you.

Thanks for the tip off about the September clues vid. I had not seen it before. I think for campaigning the no planes argument is a more dificult one to persuade on. Wheras building 7, the collapses are more concrete.

[rubber_ritchie]

When one hangs around with progressive people you may come to the conclusion that 'everyone knows....' but sadly a lot of people inlcuding well 'educated' people do not question anything about the 911 story.

Sir, you say you 'resign from the movement'. Does this mean you will never mention 911 to anyone again? Are you not going to campaign anymore? A 'movement' is a very broad term. I agree with a lot of what you say but think we need to unite in our diversity. I am sure many people who are 'members' also agree with you.

Thanks for the tip off about the September clues vid. I had not seen it before. I think for campaigning the no planes argument is a more dificult one to persuade on. Wheras building 7, the collapses are more concrete.

[telecasterisation]

[Indubitably]

Rubber_richie

The issue is (perhaps you agree) no longer whether 9/11/2001 was an 'inside job'. Every person who has studied those events in detail has concluded the same. It was an 'inside job'.

The issue is, 'what's to be done with the fact that 9/11 WAS an inside job ?'.

Well, the whole point of 9/11 research is, first, to agree crimes have been committed by these 'insiders' and then (which is the stage we are now at) to identify who committed them. If the video and film evidence shows after public scrutiny that fakery and manipulation of 'plane' images was a factor in duping the public we can say with certainty that accomplices to those crimes of 9/11 worked for/with the corporate media.

Just as we cannot blame the entire government nor can we blame the entire corporate media. These crimes were committed by men and women whose agenda is evil.

The antidote to evil is light where there is now darkness. That's what we are all committed to.

[TmcMistress]

Indubitably, you seem to be doing an awful lot of posting / sticking around for someone that was supposedly quitting.

Leave us to our non-truth, o enlightened one! I humbly beg thee to take right the hell off, and do not let the door hit ya where the Lord of your choice split ya!

[Indubitably]

Indubitably, you seem to be doing an awful lot of posting / sticking around for someone that was supposedly quitting.

Leave us to our non-truth, o enlightened one! I humbly beg thee to take right the hell off, and do not let the door hit ya where the Lord of your choice split ya!

Well, I quit the 'truth movement' as soon as it became obvious that posts such as yours were all you had to offer.

Instead of agreeing to a public hearing on broadcast 'plane' images you do nothing but act as a scarecrow. Those are the rags you wear. And now people everywhere see them.

[telecasterisation]

[TmcMistress]

[gruts]

[Indubitably]

You should ask the media perps about that. The most heavily fortified location in the entire world had dozens of cameras. It was supposedly monitoring the 'hijacked plane' many miles from the Pentagon as it headed towards them. But not a single plane image can be found, not even on the security footage.

It's ridiculous.

But it doesn't stop the media corporations telling us there was definitely a 'plane'.

It's another case of media lies.

[marky 54]

[Indubitably]

Well, the plane huggers have made such a mess of things that they haven't even examined the 'plane' footage !!!!

It has been NPT (No Planes Theory) who have done almost ALL the detailed frame by frame analysis. Just a coincidence, right ?

It is the detailed examination of these 'plane' videos that shows them to be fake. In case after case. Some of them are embarrasingly fake. Once again, it's NPT guys who said this first.

Don't ask why the criminals spread such confusion. The issue is simple. Are there fake broadcasts of planes. That's the issue and it's the issue where plane huggers need to go to school. Instead of just endlessly repeating their claims.

The bottom line. Let's examine the footage fairly, honestly, openly. If we can't do that we are wasting our own time and everyone else's.

I am happy, at last, that we can start this right here.

The winner IS the truth movement. Right ?

[John White]

[Bryan]

[marky 54]

[gruts]

[Indubitably]

Those who faked 'planes' on 9/11 at the WTC and who knowingly oversaw their broacast on television were accomplices to the murder of over 3.000 people. But the crimes of 9/11 are still continuing. They include brainwashing of the 'truth movement', a suspension of scientific rules, the belief in dozens of things which are contrary to science.

Let me give four examples from hundreds -

1. We've all seen video of a 'plane' hitting the South Tower. The 'plane' must have been made of a new wonder material. It supposedly exited the tower and a lot of its wreckage somehow fell on to the roof of WTC 5, having cut through no less than 4 sections of reinforced vertical steel columsn !!! See the FEMA report where plane wreckage has somehow arrived there having survived its amazing journey through the South Tower. With millions of people watching the South Tower the question is - Where can we see photographs/ film footage of a large exit hole in the back of the South Tower ?

2. Why is there NO consistency in the supposed angle of approach for the 'plane' that hit the South Tower ?

3. Look around on the internet or in photolibraries. Where can you find pictures of the South Tower exit hole ?

4. Why do broadcasters blank out the background to many of their 'plane' images ?

Reasonable questions, right ? Time to start thinking, right ? Don't be afraid to do it folks !

[John White]

[telecasterisation]

This is not a criticism, just a straightforward question;

Like everyone here, I have watched countless video clips and DVD's of 911. These centre around a fairly limited number of scenarios such as the south tower plane hitting, the resulting explosion, smoke, collapsing towers, etc etc.

However, the one which is most perplexing is the exiting aircraft 'nosecone'. After just a few minutes investigation, even the uninitiated will conclude that this is impossible due to several factors.

The resulting debates in forums such as these revolve around how these videos have been manipulated and broadcast on the day by those working in conjunction with the 'perps'.

The question that I would like answering is;

Did anyone here actually tape the events of the day AS they happened that captured the exiting nosecone??

The clips we see subsequently mean absolutely nothing, ONLY that which was broadcast live (or from broadcast news sources) proves collusion. Anything seen post-event via the internet is worthless.

[gruts]

[John White]

[telecasterisation]